Advertisement

Cross-country evidence on the link between job security and housing credit

  • Kurmas Akdogan
  • Elif KaracimenEmail author
  • Ayse Arzu Yavuz
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between job security and housing credit, specifically the contradiction between employment insecurity and take up of housing credit—the former being the main reason for income uncertainty and the latter necessitating long-term commitment. It is argued that higher employment protection can increase demand for housing due to its mitigating impact on uncertainty about workers’ future income streams. Using yearly data for 23 countries from 1990 to 2016, the empirical analysis suggests a positive relationship between job security and housing credit at the aggregate level. A key implication is that it is crucial to provide sufficiently paid and secure employment that will enable households to fulfill their long-term commitment to creditors to meet housing demand through the financial intermediation channel. Moreover, higher job security could mitigate income and wealth inequality, and decrease the size and duration of financial shocks due to increasing debt repayment capacity during stressful times.

Keywords

Labour markets Job security Housing credit OECD countries Panel data 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The views and opinions presented in this study belong to the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the CBRT. We would like to thank Ayşe Tatar for her valuable contributions to a previous version of this study.

References

  1. Aalbers, M. (2008). The financialization of home and the mortgage market crisis. Competition & Change, 12(2), 148–166.Google Scholar
  2. Anari, A., & Kolari, J. (2002). House prices and inflation. Real Estate Economics, 30(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
  3. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage, why high-performance work systems pay off. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arestis, P., & González-Martínez, A. R. (2015). Is job insecurity a driver of the housing cycle? Some evidence in the Spanish case. Panoeconomicus, 62(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  5. Arundel, R. (2017). Equity inequity: Housing wealth inequality, inter and intra-generational divergences, and the rise of private landlordism. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(2), 176–200.Google Scholar
  6. Arundel, R., & Doling, J. (2017). The end of mass homeownership? Changes in labour markets and housing tenure opportunities across Europe. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(4), 649–672.Google Scholar
  7. Baird, M., Charlesworth, S., & Heron, A. (2010). Flexible and part time work in Australia: Some responses to the need for work-life balance. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from http://sydney.edu.au/business/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/82416/Flexible_and_part-time_work_in_Australia.pdf.
  8. Bertola, G., Boeri, T., & Cazes, S. (2000). Employment protection in industrialized countries: The case for new indicators. International Labor Review, 139(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, O. J., Jaumotte, F., & Loungani, P. (2013). Labor market policies and IMF advice in advanced economies during the Great Recession, IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/13/02. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  10. Blanchard, O. J., & Summers, L. H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15–78.Google Scholar
  11. Christou, C., Gupta, R., Nyakabawo, W., & Wohar, M. E. (2018). Do house prices hedge inflation in the US? A quantile cointegration approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 54, 15–26.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, N., Searle, B. A., & Smith, S. J. (2009). Mortgage markets and cultures of consumption. Cultures, Markets and Consumption, 12, 133–154.Google Scholar
  13. Diaz-Serrano, L. (2005). Labor income uncertainty, skewness and homeownership: A panel data study for Germany and Spain. Journal of Urban Economics, 58, 156–176.Google Scholar
  14. Dol, K., & Boumeester, H. (2017). Home ownership under changing labour and housing market conditions: Tenure preferences and outcomes among freelancers and flex workers. International Journal of Housing Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331594.Google Scholar
  15. Doling, J., & Ford, J. (1996). The new homeownership: The impact of labour market developments on attitudes toward owning your own home. Environment and Planning, 28, 157–172.Google Scholar
  16. Doling, J., & Ronald, R. (2010). Home ownership and asset-based welfare. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(2), 165–173.Google Scholar
  17. Dotti Sani, G. M., & Acciai, C. (2017). Two hearts and a loan? Mortgages, employment insecurity and earnings among young couples in six European countries. Urban Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017717211.Google Scholar
  18. Fagan, C., Norman, H., Smith, M., & Menéndez, M. C. G. (2014). In search of good quality part-time employment. ILO, Conditions of Work and Employment Series 43. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez, R., & Aalbers, M. B. (2016). Financialization of housing: Between globalization and varieties of capitalism. Competition and Change, 20(2), 71–88.Google Scholar
  20. Filandri, M., & Bertolini, S. (2016). Young people and home ownership in Europe. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(2), 144–164.Google Scholar
  21. Finlayson, A. (2009). Financialisation, financial literacy and asset-based welfare. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11(3), 400–421.Google Scholar
  22. Forrest, R., & Hirayama, Y. (2014). The financialisation of the social project: Embedded liberalism, neoliberallism and home ownership. Urban Studies, 52(2), 233–244.Google Scholar
  23. Groves, R., Murie, A., & Watson, C. (2007). Housing and the new welfare state: Perspectives from East Asia and Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Horsewood, N., & Doling, J. (2004). Repayment risk and European home owners: The interplay of housing markets, labour markets, financial markets and social security systems. Housing Studies, 19, 433–446.Google Scholar
  25. Housing Europe. (2015). The State of housing in the EU, 2015. Brussels: Housing Europe.Google Scholar
  26. Iocaviello, M. (2005). House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle. American Economic Review, 95(3), 739–764.Google Scholar
  27. Kaltenbrunner, A., & Karacimen, E. (2016). The contested nature of financialisation in emerging capitalist economies. In T. Subasat & J. Weeks (Eds.), The Great Meltdown of 2008: Systemic, conjunctural or policy created? (pp. 287–304). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Karacimen, E. (2015). Interlinkages between credit, debt and the labour market: Evidence from Turkey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(3), 751–767.Google Scholar
  29. Kemeny, J. (2005). The Really big trade-off between home ownership and welfare: Castles’ evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on. Housing, Theory and Society, 22(2), 59–75.Google Scholar
  30. Kiyotaki, N., & Moore, J. (1997). Credit chains. Journal of Political Economy, 105(21), 211–248.Google Scholar
  31. Köhler-Ulbrich, P., Hempell, H., & Scopel, S. (2016). The euro area bank lending survey: Role, development and usein monetary policy preparation. European Central Bank Occasional Paper Series, No. 179.Google Scholar
  32. Lennartz, C., Arundel, R., & Ronald, R. (2016). Younger adults and homeownership in Europe through the GFC. Population, Place and Space, 22(8), 823–835.Google Scholar
  33. Lersch, P., & Dewilde, C. (2015). Employment insecurity and first-time homeownership: Evidence from twenty-two European countries. Environment and Planning A, 47(3), 607–624.Google Scholar
  34. Maclennan, D., & Miao, J. (2017). Housing and capital in the 21st century. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(2), 127–145.Google Scholar
  35. Maurin, E., & Postel-Vinay, F. (2005). The European job security gap. Work and Occupations, 32(2), 229–252.Google Scholar
  36. McCarthy, Y. (2013). 2013–14 Barrington lecture: Dis-entangling the mortgage arrears crisis: The role of the labour market, income volatility and negative equity. Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, 43, 71–90.Google Scholar
  37. Michie, J., & Sheehan, M. (1999). HRM practices, R&D expenditure and innovative investment: Evidence from the UK’s 1990 workplace industrial relations survey (WIRS). Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(2), 211–233.Google Scholar
  38. Montgomerie, J., & Büdenbender, M. (2015). Round the houses: Homeownership and failures of asset-based welfare in the United Kingdom. New Political Economy, 20(3), 386–405.Google Scholar
  39. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Job study. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1999). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). Employment outlook, moving beyond the jobs crisis. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Labour force statistics in OECD countries: Sources and coverage and definitions. Retrieved September 8, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/LFSNOTES_SOURCES.pdf.
  43. Pryke, M. (1994). Commentary: Finance, property and ‘layers of newspaper ironies’. Environment and Planning A, 26(2), 167–170.Google Scholar
  44. Ronald, R., Lennartz, C., & Kadi, J. (2017). Whatever happened to asset-based welfare? Shifting approaches to housing wealth and welfare security. Policy and Politics, 45(2), 173–193.Google Scholar
  45. Salvi del Pero, A., Adema, W., Ferraro, V., & Frey, V. (2016). Policies to promote access to good-quality affordable housing in OECD countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 176. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  46. Scanlon, K., Arrigoita, M. F., & Whitehead, C. (2015). Social housing in Europe. European Policy Analysis, 17, 1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Tridico, P. (2012). Financial crisis and global imbalances: Its labour market origins and the aftermath. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 17–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structurual Economic Research DepartmentCentral Bank of the Republic of TurkeyUlus, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsRecep Tayyip Erdogan UniversityRizeTurkey
  3. 3.Research and Monetary Policy DepartmentCentral Bank of the Republic of TurkeyUlus, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations