Housing market (in)stability and social rented housing: comparing Austria and Ireland during the global financial crisis

  • Michelle NorrisEmail author
  • Michael Byrne


Since the 1970s the prevalence and duration of housing market booms has increased in developed countries as has the busts which followed them. These developments and particularly their occurrence in a large number of countries simultaneously were key contributors to the global financial crisis of 2008. The literature on this crisis has focused primarily on the role of mortgage markets and home-ownership in driving housing booms and busts and also on the countries which have experienced the strongest busts, particularly in the English-speaking world. Despite the large number of social rented dwellings in Western Europe, the role of this sector has been largely neglected in the literature as has developments in countries unaffected by the crisis. This article aims to address these omissions by examining the interaction of social housing and the housing market in Ireland, which experienced a spectacular housing market boom in the 1990s, and bust in the 2000s and Austria which has a long tradition of housing market stability. It argues that social housing played an important but contrasting role shaping the housing market dynamics in these two countries. In Ireland social housing was pro-cyclical—it accelerated the housing market boom and intensified the bust; whereas Austrian social housing had a counter cyclical impact on the housing market and thereby helped to promote price stability. These outcomes were partially reflected in the different social housing policy regimes in use in these countries—Austria represents a ‘unitary’ and Ireland a ‘dualist’ housing regime in Kemeny’s (From public housing to the social market: rental policy strategies in comparative perspective, Routledge, London, 1995) typology. In addition, the sources of finance for social housing and the demand-side or supply-side orientation of subsidies were also important drivers of these contrasting outcomes.


Social housing Financhialization Housing market booms Housing regimes 


  1. Aalbers, M. B. (2009). The sociology and geography of mortgage markets: Reflections on the financial crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalbers, M. B. (2015). The great moderation, the great excess and the global housing crisis. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aalbers, M., van Loon, J., & Fernandez, R. (2015). The financialization of a social housing provider. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 572–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnello, L., & Schuknecht, L. (2009). Booms and busts in housing markets: Determinants and implications. Journal of Housing Economics, 20(3), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amann, W., Lawson, J., & Mundt, A. (2009). Structured financing allows for affordable rental housing in Austria. Housing Finance International, XXIII(4), 14–18.Google Scholar
  6. Amann, W., & Mundt, A. (2005). The Austrian system of social housing finance. Stockholm: International Union of Tenants. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  7. Bisset, J. (2008). Regeneration: Public good or private profit?. Dublin: TASC.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, R. (2006). Finance and the fourth dimension. New Left Review, 39, 39–70.Google Scholar
  9. Bone, J., & O’Reilly, K. (2010). No place called home: The causes and social consequences of the UK housing ‘bubble’. British Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenner, R. (2006). The economics of global turbulence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Byrne, M. (2016a). ‘Asset Price Urbanism’ and financialization after the crisis: Ireland’s National Asset Management Agency. International Journal of Urban Regional, 40(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, M. (2016b). Entrepreneurial urbanism after the crisis: Ireland’s “Bad Bank” and the redevelopment of Dublin’s Docklands. Antipode, 48(2), 899–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne, M., & Norris, M. (2017). Procyclical social housing and the crisis of Irish housing policy: Marketization, social housing, and the property boom and bust. Housing Policy Debate, 28(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  14. Byrne, M., & Norris, M. (2018). Procyclical social housing and the crisis of Irish housing policy: Marketization, social housing, and the property boom and bust. Housing Policy Debate, 28(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Central Statistics Office. (2008). Construction and housing in Ireland, 2008 edition. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  16. Central Statistics Office. (various years). Census of Population of Ireland. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  17. Crouch, C. (2009). Privatised Keynesianism: An acknowledged policy regime. British Journal of Politics and International Studies, 11(3), 328–399.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government. (various years). Annual housing statistics bulletin. Dublin: DHPLG.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (various years). Revised estimates for public services. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  20. Department of Social Protection. (2015). Maximum rent limit analysis and findings report. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.Google Scholar
  21. Department of Social Protection. (various years). Social welfare statistics. Dublin: DSP.Google Scholar
  22. Deutsch, E. (2009). The Austrian social rented sector at the crossroads for housing choice. International Journal of Housing Policy, 9(3), 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DKM Economic Consultants and Brady Shipman and Martin. (2012). Review of Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000. Dublin: The Housing Agency.Google Scholar
  24. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. European Central Bank. (2009). Housing finance in the Euro area. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  26. European Mortgage Federation. (various years). Hypostat. Brussels: EMF.Google Scholar
  27. Eurostat. (various years). Economy and finance statistics. Brussels: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  28. Fitz Gerald, J. (2005). The Irish housing stock: Growth in number of vacant dwellings. Quarterly Economic Commentary, 24, 1–22.Google Scholar
  29. Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1988). Selling the welfare state: The privatisation of public housing. London: Routedge.Google Scholar
  30. Hardiman, N., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2013). How governments retrench in crisis: The case of Ireland. Dublin: University College Dublin, Geary Institute for Public Policy Working Paper.Google Scholar
  31. Hearne, R. (2011). Public private partnerships in Ireland: Failed experiment or the way forward for the state. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Helbich, M., Brunauer, W., Vaz, E., & Nijkamp, P. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in hedonic house price models: The case of Austria. Urban Studies, 51(2), 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodkinson, S. (2011). Housing regeneration and the private finance initiative in England: Unstitching the neoliberal urban straitjacket. Antipode, 43(2), 358–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoekstra, J. (2009). Two types of rental system? An exploratory empirical test of Kemeny’s rental system typology. Urban Studies, 46(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Honohan, P. (1992). Fiscal Adjustment in Ireland in the 1980s. Economic and Social Review, 23(3), 258–314.Google Scholar
  36. Immergluck, D. (2015). A look back: What we now know about the causes of the US mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(3), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly, S. (2014). Light-touch regulation: The rise and fall of the Irish banking sector. In A. MacLaran & S. Kelly (Eds.), Neoliberal urban policy and the transformation of the city: Reshaping Dublin. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  38. Kemeny, J. (1995). From public housing to the social market: Rental policy strategies in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kemeny, J., Kersloot, J., & Thalmann, P. (2005). Non-profit housing influencing, leading, and dominating the unitary rental market: Three case studies. Housing Studies, 20(6), 855–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kennedy, K., Giblin, T., & McHugh, D. (1988). The economic development of Ireland in the twentieth century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Kitchin, R., O’Callaghan, C., Boyle, M., Gleeson, J., & Keaveney, K. (2012). Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A, 44(6), 1302–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. López, I., & Rodríguez, E. (2010). Fin de ciclo: financiarización, territorio y socieded de propeitarios en la onda large del capitalismo hispano. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.Google Scholar
  43. López, I., & Rodríguez, E. (2011). The Spanish model. New Left Review, 69, 5–29.Google Scholar
  44. Louis, P., Hilbers, C., Banerji, H., Shi, H., & Hoffmaister, A. (2008). House price developments in Europe: A comparison. Washington: Intrenational Monetary Federation.Google Scholar
  45. Ludl, H. (2007). Limited profit housing associations in Austria. Vienna: GBV. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  46. MacLaran, A., & Kelly, S. (Eds.). (2014). Neoliberal urban policy and the transformation of the city: Reshaping Dublin. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  47. MacLeod, G. (2002). From urban entrepreneurialism to the revanchist city: On the spatial injustices to Glasgow’s renaissance. Antipode, 34, 602–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matznetter, W. (2002). Social housing policy in a conservative welfare state: Austria as an example. Urban Studies, 39(2), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCabe, C. (2011). Sins of the Father: Tracing the decisions that shaped the Irish economy. Dublin: The History Press Ireland.Google Scholar
  50. Meek, J. (2014). Private island: Why Britain now belongs to someone else. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  51. Mercille, J., & Murphy, E. (2015). Deepening neoliberalism, crisis, and Austerity: Europe’s treasure Ireland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mundt, A., & Amman, W. (2009). Indicators of a unitary rental market in Austria. Paper presented to the European Network for Housing Research Conference, Prague, 28 June–1 July.Google Scholar
  53. Mundt, A., & Amann, W. (2010). Indicators of an integrated rental market in Austria. Housing Finance International, Winter 2010, 35–44.Google Scholar
  54. Mundt, A., & Springler, E. (2014). Milestones in social housing finance in Austria over the last twenty five years. In J. Lunde & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Milestones in European Housing Finance. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Norris, M. (2014). Path dependence and critical junctures in Irish rental policy: From dualist to unitary rental markets? Housing Studies, 29(5), 616–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norris, M. (2016). Property, family and the Irish welfare state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norris, M., & Byrne, M. (2015). Asset price urbanism in the Irish and Spanish housing crises. Built Environment, 41(2), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Norris, M., & Coates, D. (2014). How housing killed the Celtic tiger: Anatomy and consequences of Ireland’s housing boom and bust. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(2), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norris, M., & Shiels, P. (2007). Housing affordability in the Republic of Ireland: Is planning part of the problem or part of the solution? Housing Studies, 22(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ó Riain, S. (2014). The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger: Liberalism, boom and bust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reinprecht, C. (2007). Social housing in Austria. In C. Whitehead & K. Scanlon (Eds.), Social housing in Europe (pp. 35–43). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  62. Rolnik, R. (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financialization of homeownership and housing rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sirr, L. (Ed.). (2014). Renting in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  64. Statictik Österreich. (various years). Wohnen. Wien: Statistik Österreich.Google Scholar
  65. Stephens, M., Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2015). Post-socialist housing systems in Europe: Housing welfare regimes by default? Housing Studies, 30(8), 1210–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Threshold. (2016). Immediate policy priorities for the private rented sector. Dublin: Threshold.Google Scholar
  67. Unger, B., & Heitzmann, K. (2003). The adjustment path of the Austrian welfare state: Back to Bismark? Journal of European Social Policy, 13(4), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. van den Noord, P. (2005). Tax incentives and house price volatility in the euro area: Theory and evidence. Economie Internationale, 101(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
  69. van der Zwan, N. (2012). State of the art: Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34(3), 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weiser, R., & Mundt, A. (2014). Housing subsidies and taxation in Six EU countries: Trends structures and recent measures in the light of the global financial crisis. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 7(3), 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whitehead, C. (2014). Financing social rented housing in Europe. In K. Scanlon, C. Whitehead, & M. Fernández Arrigoita (Eds.), Social housing in Europe. London: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  73. Whitehead, C., & Williams, P. (2011). Causes and consequences? Exploring the shape and direction of the housing system in the UK post the financial crisis. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 1157–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams, B., Shiels, P., & Hughes, B. (2003). Access to housing: The role of housing supply and urban development policy in the Greater Dublin area. Journal of Irish Urban Studies, 2(1), 25–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social JusticeUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations