Advertisement

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 789–805 | Cite as

Population dynamics and ethnic geographies in Oslo: the impact of migration and natural demographic change on ethnic composition and segregation

  • Terje WesselEmail author
  • Lena Magnusson Turner
  • Viggo Nordvik
Article

Abstract

This paper explores demographic processes behind ethnic geographies in Oslo. We compare data for census tracts in 2001 and 2011, and decompose ethnic composition and segregation on local mobility, national migration, international migration and natural demographic change. The study comprises five national groups: Poles, Somalis, Sri Lankans, Iraqis and Pakistanis, plus aggregates for Nordic and non-Nordic residents. A key observation is that local mobility weakens the status of original settlements without a corresponding effect on levels of ethnic segregation. For several groups, local mobility increases both own-group exposure and separation from the Nordic majority. International migration, in contrast, increases spatial integration between Nordic and non-Nordic residents. Natural change accords with our expectation and strengthens both minority representation in established eastern settlements and ethnic segregation in Oslo at large. Certain features of the Oslo context, e.g. lack of multi-ethic experiences, domination of owner-occupied dwellings and redistributive policies, may explain the surprising results.

Keywords

Ethnic segregation Demographic events Spatial mobility Natural demographic growth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for useful proposals.

References

  1. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2005). Remaking the American mainstream. Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, W. (1980). The population factor and urban structure. In L. S. Bourne (Ed.), Internal structure of the city. Readings on urban form, growth, and policy (pp. 540–551). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, N., Jacobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2012). A field experiment of discrimination in the Norwegian housing market: Gender, class, and ethnicity. Land Economics, 88(1), 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, R. (1998). Socio-spatial dynamics: Ethnic divisions of mobility and housing in post-Palme Sweden. Urban Studies, 35(3), 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, R., & Bråmå, Å. (2004). Selective migration in Swedish distressed neighbourhoods: Can area-based urban policies counteract segregation processes? Housing Studies, 19(4), 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, N. (2012). How spatial segregation changes over time: Sorting out the sorting processes. Environment and Planning A, 44(3), 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayer, P., Mcmillan, R., & Rueben, K. S. (2004). What drives racial segregation? New evidence using census microdata. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(3), 514–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blom, S. (2012). Etnisk konsentrasjon i Oslo over to tiår. [Ethnic concentration in Oslo over two decades]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 15(4), 275–291.Google Scholar
  9. Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2002). Moving up or moving down? Housing careers of Turks and Moroccans in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 17(3), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2010). Ethnic segregation and residential mobility: Relocations of minority ethnic groups in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolt, G., Van Kempen, R., & Van Ham, M. (2008). Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: Spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy. Urban Studies, 45(7), 1359–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonvalet, C., Carpentier, C., & White, P. (1995). The residential mobility of ethnic minorities: A longitudinal analysis. Urban Studies, 32(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bråmå, Å. (2006). ‘White flight’? The production and reproduction of immigrant concentration areas in Swedish Cities, 1990–2000. Urban Studies, 43(7), 1127–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgers, J., & van der Lugt, H. (2006). Spatial assimilation of minority groups. The case of Surinamese in the Rotterdam region. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, W. A. V., & Drever, A. I. (2000). Residential mobility in a constrained housing market: Implications for ethnic populations in Germany. Environment and Planning A, 32(5), 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finney, N., & Simpson, L. (2008). Internal migration and ethnic groups: Evidence for Britain from the 2001 Census. Population, Space and Place, 14(2), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finney, N., & Simpson, L. (2009). Population dynamics: The roles of natural change and migration in producing the ethnic mosaic. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(9), 1479–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gulbrandsen, L., & Torgersen, U. (1987). Forstadsvekst og boliginteresser [Urban growth and housing interests]. Oslo: INAS-rapport 87/1.Google Scholar
  19. Hilson, M. (2011). The Nordic model: Scandinavia since 1945. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  20. Hoover, K. (1970). Norwegians in New York. In Studies and records volume XXIV by the Norwegian–American historical association. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://naha.stolaf.edu/pubs/nas/volume24/vol24_9.html.
  21. Huttman, E., Blauw, W., & Saltman, J. (Eds.). (1991). Urban housing segregation of minorities in Western Europe and the United States. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Iceland, J., & Scopilliti, M. (2008). Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1990–2000. Demography, 45(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaufman, E., & Harris, G. (2015). White flight or positive contact? Local diversity and attitudes to immigration in Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1563–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kjelstadli, K. (1990). Den delte byen. Fra 1900 til 1948 [The divided city. From 1900 to 1948]. Oslo: J.W. Cappelens Forlag AS.Google Scholar
  25. Macpherson, R. A., & Strömgren, M. (2013). Spatial assimilation and native partnership: Evidence of Iranian and Iraqi immigrant mobility from segregated areas in Stockholm, Sweden. Population, Space and Place, 19(3), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magnusson Turner, L., Nordvik, V., & Sørvoll, J. (2015) Boligbehov og ubalanser i norske storbyer [Housing needs and imbalances in Norwegian Major Cities]. Oslo: NOVA Rapport 5/15.Google Scholar
  27. Magnusson Turner, L., & Wessel, T. (2013). Upwards, outwards and westwards: Relocation of ethnic minority groups in the Oslo region. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 95(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Massey, D. S. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69(3), 315–349.Google Scholar
  29. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordvik, V., & Magnusson Turner, L. (2015). Survivals and exits in neighbourhoods: A long-term analysis. Housing Studies, 30(2), 228–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oslo Municipality. (2017). Flyktningmeldingen [The refugee report]. Oslo: Byrådssak 5/17 [City Government proposition 5/17].Google Scholar
  32. Rathelot, R., & Safi, M. (2014). Local ethnic composition and natives’ and immigrants’ geographic mobility in France, 1982–1999. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaake, K., Burgers, J., & Mulder, C. H. (2014). Ethnicity, education and income, and residential mobility between neighbourhoods. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(4), 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson, L. (2004). Statistics of racial segregation: Measures, evidence and policy. Urban Studies, 41(3), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simpson, L., & Finney, N. (2009). Spatial patterns of internal migration: Evidence for ethnic groups in Britain. Population, Space and Place, 15(1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simpson, L., Gavalas, V., & Finney, N. (2008). Population dynamics in ethnically diverse towns: The long-term implications of immigration. Urban Studies, 45(1), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skifter Andersen, H. (2016). Spatial assimilation? The development in immigrants’ residential career with duration of stay in Denmark. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stambøl, L. S. (2013). Flytting til og fra Oslos bydeler [Mobility to and from townships in Oslo]. Statistics Norway, Oslo: Rapporter 11/2013.Google Scholar
  39. Stilwell, J. (2010). Ethnic population concentration and net migration in London. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1439–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The Government. (2011). Velferd og migrasjon. Den norske modellens framtid. [Welfare and migration. The Future of the Norwegian model]. Oslo: NOU 2011: 7.Google Scholar
  41. Van Ham, M., & Clark, W. A. (2009). Neighbourhood mobility in context: Household moves and changing neighbourhoods in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1442–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wessel, T. (2000). Social polarisation and socioeconomic segregation in a welfare state: The case of Oslo. Urban Studies, 37(11), 1947–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wessel, T. (2017). Det todelte Oslo—etniske minoritter i øst og vest [The divided Oslo—ethnic minorities in east and west]. In J. Ljunggren (Ed.), Oslo—ulikhetenes by [Oslo—the city of inequalities] (pp. 81–104). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
  44. Wessel, T., Andersson, R., Kauppinen, T., & Skifter Andersen, H. (2017). Spatial assimilation of immigrants in Nordic Cities: The relevance of spatial assimilation theory in a welfare state context. Urban Affairs Review, 53(5), 812–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zorlu, A., & Mulder, C. H. (2008). Initial and subsequent location choices of immigrants to the Netherlands. Regional Studies, 42(2), 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Social ResearchOslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations