Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 533–558 | Cite as

Housing and subjective well-being of older adults in Europe

  • Daniël J. HerbersEmail author
  • Clara H. Mulder


Housing quality is known to be related to subjective well-being (SWB), but much less is known how this relationship varies with national contexts. This study addresses the association between housing tenure and housing quality on the one hand and the SWB of older Europeans on the other, given the differences in housing markets across Europe. Data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe were used, and linear regression models of SWB were estimated for 16 European countries. The findings indicate that being a renter is negatively related to SWB, while having a large house is positively associated with it. The negative effect of being a renter on SWB is small in several countries with accessible and well-regulated rental markets. Moreover, the difference in SWB between older people with a small and a large dwelling is somewhat smaller in countries with a high level of housing quality than in countries with lower housing quality. For each of our housing indicators, however, we also found countries for which the findings deviated from the general pattern. The findings imply that housing-market characteristics matter to how housing relates to SWB and, therefore, that housing-market interventions might affect this relationship.


Well-being Ageing Housing Cross-national research Housing tenure Housing quality 



This paper uses data from SHARE wave 4 release 1.1.1, as of 28 March 2013(DOI:  10.6103/SHARE.w4.111). The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th Framework Programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5- CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th Framework Programme (SHARE-PREP, N° 211909, SHARE-LEAP, N° 227822 and SHARE M4, N° 261982). Additional funding from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, R21 AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG BSR06-11 and OGHA 04-064) and the German Ministry of Education and Research as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see for a full list of funding institutions).


  1. Allen, J., Barlow, J., Leal, J., Maloutas, T., & Padovani, L. (2004). Housing and welfare in Southern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelini, V., Laferrère, A., & Weber, G. (2013). Home-ownership in Europe: How did it happen? Advances in Life Course Research, 18(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E., & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5(2), 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aurand, A., & Reynolds, A. (2013). Elderly mobility and the occupancy status of single-family homes. Housing Studies, 28(5), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behring, K., & Helbrecht, I. (2002). Wohneigentum in Europa. Ludwigsburg: Wustenrot Stiftung.Google Scholar
  6. Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., et al. (2013). Data resource profile: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  7. Cairney, J., & Boyle, M. H. (2004). Home ownership, mortgages and psychological distress. Housing Studies, 19(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutchin, M. P. (2003). The process of mediated ageing-in-place: A theoretically and empirically based model. Social Science and Medicine, 57(6), 1077–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe [Report]. Dublin: European Foundation for the improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. C. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elsinga, M. G. (1995). Een eigen huis voor een smalle beurs: Het ideaal voor bewoner en overheid? [Homeownership on a Low Budget]. Dissertation, Delft University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elsinga, M., & Hoekstra, J. S. C. M. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EMF. (2012). Hypostat: Key figures 2012. Brussels: European Mortgage Federation.Google Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, G. W., Kantrowitz, E., & Eshelman, P. (2002). Housing quality and psychological well-being among the elderly population. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(4), 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fausset, C. B., Kelly, A. J., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2011). Challenges to ageing in place: Understanding home maintenance difficulties. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federcasa. (2006). Statistics in the European Union, 2005/2006. Rome: Federcasa.Google Scholar
  21. Fernández-Carro, C., & Evandrou, M. (2014). Staying put: Factors associated with ageing in one’s ‘lifetime home’. Insights from the European context. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 2(1), 28–56.Google Scholar
  22. Gaymu, J., & Springer, S. (2010). Living conditions and life satisfaction of older Europeans living alone: A gender and cross-country analysis. Ageing and Society, 30(7), 1153–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gitlin, L. N. (2003). Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 628–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golant, S. M., & La Greca, A. J. (1995). The relative deprivation Of U.S. elderly households as judged by their housing problems. Journal of Gerontology Social Sciences, 50B(1), S13–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen, T., Slagsvold, B., & Moum, T. (2009). Childlessness and psychological well-being in midlife and old age: An examination of parental status effects across a range of outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 94(2), 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoekstra, J. (2005). Is there a connection between welfare state regime and dwelling type? An exploratory statistical analysis. Housing Studies, 20(3), 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoekstra, J. (2009). Two types of rental system? An exploratory empirical test of Kemeny’s rental system typology. Urban Studies, 46(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffmann, E., & Scott, M. (1992). The revised international standard classification of occupation [Report], ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labour Office, Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  30. Iwarsson, S., Horstmann, V., & Slaug, B. (2007a). Housing matters in very old age-yet differently due to ADL dependence level differences. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iwarsson, S., & Isacsson, Å. (1997). Quality of life in the elderly population: an example exploring interrelationships among subjective well-being, ADL dependence, and housing accessibility. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 26(1997), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H. W., & Nygren, C. (2004). Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: Lessons from the ENABLE-AGE project. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H., Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., et al. (2007b). Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: Conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE project. The Gerontologist, 47(1), 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemeny, J. (1995). From public housing to social renting: Rental policy strategy in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemeny, J. (2001). Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim, J. E., & Moen, P. (2001). Is retirement good or bad for subjective well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larsen, R. J., & Eid, M. (2008). Ed Diener and the science of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 1–13). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mandic, S. (2012). Home ownership in post-socialist countries: Between macro economy and micro structures of welfare provision. In R. Ronald & M. Elsinga (Eds.), Beyond home ownership: housing, welfare and society (pp. 68–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Mandic, S., & Cirman, A. (2012). Housing conditions and their structural determinants: Comparisions within the enlarged EU. Urban Studies, 49(4), 777–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011). A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. S. (1950). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of The American Soldier (pp. 40–105). Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mulder, C. H., & Billari, F. C. (2010). Homeownership regimes and low fertility. Housing Studies, 25(4), 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Musterd, S. (2014). Public housing for whom? Experiences in an era of mature neo-liberalism: The Netherlands and Amsterdam. Housing Studies, 29(4), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norris, M., & Domanski, H. (2009). Housing conditions, states, markets and households: A Pan-European analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(3), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norris, M., & Shiels, P. (2007). Housing inequalities in an enlarged European Union: Patterns, drivers, implications. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norris, M., & Winston, M. (2012). Home-ownership, housing regimes and income inequalities in Western Europe. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Iwarsson, S., Fange, A., Sixsmith, J., Schilling, O., et al. (2007). Relationships between objective and perceived housing in very old age. The Gerontologist, 47(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oswald, F., Jopp, D., Rott, C., & Wahl, H. (2011). Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? The Gerontologist, 51(2), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oswald, F., & Wahl, H. (2004). Housing and health in later life. Reviews of Environmental Health, 19(3–4), 223–252.Google Scholar
  52. Oswald, F., Wahl, H., Mollenkopf, H., & Schilling, O. (2003). Housing and life satisfaction of older adults in two rural regions in Germany. Research on Aging, 25(2), 122–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oswald, F., Wahl, H., Schilling, O., Nygren, C., Fange, A., Sixsmith, A., et al. (2007). Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. The Gerontologist, 47(1), 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pittini, A., & Laino, E. (2011). Housing Europe review, 2012: The nuts and bolts of European social housing systems [Report]. Brussels: CECODHAS Housing Europe’s Observatory.Google Scholar
  56. Poggio, T. (2012). The housing pillar of the Mediterranean welfare regime: Relations between home ownership and other dimensions of welfare in Italy. In R. Ronald & M. Elsinga (Eds.), Beyond home ownership: Housing, welfare and society (pp. 51–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Rohe, W. M., & Basolo, V. (1997). Long-term effects of homeownership on the self-perceptions and social interaction of low-income persons. Environment and Behavior, 29(6), 793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rohe, W. M., Van Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2013). The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research. In J. R. Tighe & E. J. Mueller (Eds.), The affordable housing reader. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Ronald, R. (2007). Comparing homeowner societies: Can we construct an east–west model? Housing Studies, 22(4), 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rossi, P. H., & Weber, E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saunders, P. (1990). A nation of home owners. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  62. Serra, P., Dias, J. G., & De FátimaSalgueiro, M. (2013). Life satisfaction: A MIMIC approach with a discrete latent variable. In J. L. Da Silva, I. N. Caeiro, C. A. Braumann, M. L. Esquível, & J. T. Mexia (Eds.), Advances in regression, survival analysis, extreme values, Markov processes and other statistical applications: Studies in theoretical and applied statistics (pp. 437–444). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Sixsmith, J., Sixsmith, A., Fänge, A. M., Naumann, D., Kucsera, C. S. A. B. A., Tomsone, S., et al. (2014). Healthy ageing and home: The perspectives of very old people in five European countries. Social Science and Medicine, 106, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stewart, Q. T. (2006). Reinvigorating relative deprivation: A new measure for a classic concept. Social Science Research, 35, 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torgersen, U. (1987). Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 4(1), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toussaint, J. & Elsinga, M. (2006). The meaning of housing tenure in eight European countries. Paper presented at the conference: Home ownership in Europe; policy and research issues, Delft.Google Scholar
  67. UNESCO. (2006). ISCED, International Standard Classification of Education, 1997 [Report]. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  68. Van der Pers, M., Mulder, C. H., & Steverink, N. (2015). Geographic proximity of adult children and the well-being of older persons. Research on Aging, 37(5), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vera-Toscano, E., & Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). The relevance of social interaction on housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 86, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2012) The meaning of "Aging in Place" to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zumbro, T. (2014). The relationship between homeownership and life satisfaction in Germany. Housing Studies, 29(3), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistics NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Population Research Centre, Faculty of Spatial SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations