Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 157–175 | Cite as

Putting a price on your neighbour

Article

Abstract

Neighbourhood population composition affects the willingness to pay for housing units. This paper utilises a large and rich data set and hedonic regression techniques to disentangle the effect that neighbourhood affluence and presence of inhabitants with an immigrant background have on home prices. Furthermore, we specify an empirical model in a way that also enable us to test for the effect of diversity, both in terms of income levels and of the composition of the immigrant population of a neighbourhood. The hedonic model can be viewed as a variety of an amenity interpretation of the population composition of a neighbourhood. Estimation of effects of population composition is not straightforward as there is good reason to believe that population composition is both endogenously determined together with house prices and that area level omitted variables could bias estimates. This is addressed by lagging the composition measures and by formulating two different models that address these difficulties in different ways. We estimated one random effects model that instruments within neighbourhood variation in population composition and one fixed effects model that control for omitted variables. We find that coefficient estimates are robust across these specifications.

Keywords

Home prices Neighbourhood characteristics Diversity Urban sorting Oslo 

References

  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 762–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, M. J. (1959). Note on the economics of residential zoning and urban renewal. Land Economics, 35(3), 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, M. J. (1966). Effects of race and of other demographic factors on the values of single-family homes. Land Economics, 42(2), 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakens, J., Mulder, P., & Nijkamp, P. (2013). Economic impacts of cultural diversity in the Netherlands: Productivity, utility and sorting. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumont, C. (2009). Spatial effects of urban public policies on housing values. Papers in Regional Science, 88, 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer, P., & McMillan, R. (2008). Distinguishing racial preferences in the housing market: Theory and evidence. In A. Baranzini, J. Ramirez, C. Schaerer & P.Thalmann (Eds.), Hedonic methods in housing markets pricing environmental amenities and segregation (pp. 225–244). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blom, S., & Henriksen, K. (2008). Levekår blant innvandrere i Norge 2005/2006 (Living conditions among immigrants 2005/2006). SSB Report. Google Scholar
  8. Card, D., Mas, A., & Rothstein, J. (2008). Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 177–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (1998). Estimating the demand for housing, land, and neighbourhood characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60, 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chin, T., & Chau, K. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27, 145–165.Google Scholar
  12. Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (1999). The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 455–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denton, N. A., & Massey, D. S. (1991). Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multiethnic world: US metropolitan areas, 1970–1980. Demography, 28, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeSilva, S., Pham, A., & Smith, J. (2012). Racial and ethnic price differentials in a small urban housing market. Housing Policy Debate, 22(2), 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubin, R. A., & Goodman, A. C. (1982). Valuation of education and crime neighborhood characteristics through hedonic housing prices. Population and Environment, 5, 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S., et al. (1978). “Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs:” Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue? Social Science Research, 7, 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiva, J. H., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2011). Information shocks and the dynamics of the housing market*. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 525–552.Google Scholar
  18. Friedrichs, J., Magnusson Turner, L., & Nordvik, V. (2014). Migrant diversity and segregation in Oslo 1990–2011. Edinburg: ENHR.Google Scholar
  19. Galster, G. (2003). Neighbourhood dynamics and housing markets. In T. O'Sullivan & K. Gibb (Eds.), Housing economics and public policy (Chap. 9, pp. 153–171). Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  20. Galster, G. (2012). Driving Detroit: The quest for respect in the Motor City. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herath, S. & Maier, G. (2010). The hedonic price method in real estate and housing market research. A review of the literature. Discussion Papers, 2010/03. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.Google Scholar
  23. Hoff, K., & Sen, A. (2005). Homeownership, community interactions, and segregation. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1167–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, Q. (2014). Ethnic diversity and neighborhood house prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moye, R. (2014). Neighborhood racial–ethnic change and home value appreciation: evidence from Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 35, 236–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nathan, M. (2015). After Florida: Towards an economics of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osland, L., & Thorsen, I. (2008). Effects on housing prices of urban attraction and labor-market accessibility. Environment and Planning. A, 40, 2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ottaviano, G. I., & Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation†. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sethi, R., & Somanathan, R. (2004). Inequality and segregation. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1296–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Visser, P., Van Dam, F., & Hooimeijer, P. (2008). Residential environment and spatial variation in house prices in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 99, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wigren, R. (1987). House prices in Sweden: The significance of attributes. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 4, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yinger, J. (1976). Racial prejudice and racial residential segregation in an urban model. Journal of Urban Economics, 3, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yinger, J. (2014). Hedonic estimates of neighborhood ethnic preferences. Public Finance Review,. doi:10.1177/1091142113520562.Google Scholar
  37. Zabel, J. E. (2008). Using hedonic models to measure racial discrimination and prejudice in the US housing market. In A. Baranzini, J. Ramirez, C. Schaerer & P.Thalmann (Eds.), Hedonic methods in housing markets pricing environmental amenities and segregation (pp. 177–201). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Zhang, J. (2011). Tipping and residential segregation: A unified schelling model. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NOVAOslo and Akershus University CollegeOsloNorway
  2. 2.Stord/Haugesund University CollegeHaugesundNorway

Personalised recommendations