Subjective perception versus objective indicators of overcrowding and housing affordability
- 293 Downloads
This article seeks to evaluate indicators of overcrowding and housing affordability used by Eurostat and to propose alternatives that may better reflect the specific contexts of individual EU states while preserving the possibility of valuable international comparison. The alternatives are assessed on the basis of the distance between the results produced by objective measures and the subjective evaluations of the problem reported by households, using one and the same data source: EU-SILC. The results show that alternative threshold definitions may decrease the current discrepancy between subjective perceptions and objective indicators of housing affordability and overcrowding. They also have the potential to lead to more effective targeting of public subsidies so that they are directed towards housing programmes that not only have an objective goal but also a subjectively identified legitimacy.
KeywordsHousing Indicators Overcrowding Housing affordability
- Dewilde, C., & De Decker, P. (2014). Trends in housing inequalities in Europe: What has happened and why does it matter? HOWCOME Working Paper 4.Google Scholar
- Eurostat. (2014a). Statistics explained (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/). Accessed on 21.12.2014. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Housing_cost_overburden_rate.
- Eurostat. (2014b). Statistics explained (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/). Accessed on 21.12.2014. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Overcrowding_rate.
- Garnett, D. (2000). Housing finance. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
- Li, J. (2014). Recent trends on housing affordability research: Where we are up to? Urban Research Group—CityU on Cities Working Paper Series, No. 5/2014. https://www.google.cz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDUQFjACahUKEwjq9fD8mo3IAhXLWSwKHXQWD8g&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cityu.edu.hk%2Fcityuoncities%2Fupload%2Ffile%2Foriginal%2F705520150126143516.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFV557DWBQul8EM-FbHV9mlmYo43Q&cad=rja.
- Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2006). Vývoj finanční dostupnosti nájemního a vlastnického bydlení v průběhu hospodářské transformace v České republice (1991–2003) (Housing affordability of rental and owner-occupied housing over the course of the economic transformation in the Czech Republic 1991–2003). Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 42(5), 851–881.Google Scholar
- Maclennan, D., & Williams, R. (1990). Affordable housing in Europe. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013). How’s life? At a glance. In How’s life? 2013: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/how-s-life-2013/how-s-life-at-a-glance_how_life-2013-6-en#page1.
- Özdemir, E., & Ward, T. (2009). Housing and social inclusion. European Commission. http://www.google.cz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fsocial%2FBlobServlet%3FdocId%3D4828%26langId%3Den&ei=7OSHVIigBYT1UIe1ghA&usg=AFQjCNFX_YMfxI99p6JXo9Lpnbe7nReIRw&bvm=bv.81456516,d.d24.
- Randall, C., Corp, A., & Self, A. (2014). Measuring national well-being: Life in the UK, 2014. Newport: Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-national-well-being/life-in-the-uk–2014/art-mnwb–life-in-the-uk–2014.html.
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. NBER Working Paper No. 14282, August 2008. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14282.
- Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.