Home ownership as a (crumbling) fourth pillar of social insurance in Australia

  • Judith YatesEmail author
  • Bruce Bradbury
Original Paper


Australia is seen as being at the forefront of shifts to an explicit asset-based policy in its approach to maintaining post-retirement living standards, having initiated a move away from an unfunded retirement income system to a universal, funded system in the early 1990s. This move supplemented a considerable implicit asset-based policy based on home ownership. This paper examines the potential that asset-based welfare has to protect households from poverty after retirement by focusing on the role of home ownership in preventing poverty among older Australians and on likely future trends in asset accumulation. It suggests that, although asset-based welfare has the potential to ease the fiscal constraints faced by the state, it may well lead to poorer social insurance outcomes for households with limited saving capacity over their lifetime. Older households who miss out on home ownership are shown to be multiply disadvantaged: they have lower non-housing wealth, lower disposable incomes and higher housing costs in retirement than homeowners and they have significantly higher after-housing poverty rates. Projections suggest that this group will grow in size in the coming decades. These outcomes suggest that Australia’s asset-based welfare system is crumbling.


After housing poverty Asset based welfare Australia Home ownership Retirement income Social insurance 



We would like to thank the Australian Research Council for financial support and Peter Saunders, seminar participants at the University of New South Wales and two anonymous referees for comments on earlier versions of this paper.


  1. Australian Government. (2004). A more flexible and adaptable retirement income system. The Treasury: Canberra. Downloaded February 26th 2004.
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1995). Australian social trends, 1995, ABS Cat. No. 4102.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). Year Book Australia, 2001, ABS Cat. No. 1301.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2006). Population projections, 2004 to 2101 Reissue, ABS Cat. No. 3222.0. Downloaded 30th May 2008.
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2007). Basic community profile (Australia), ABS Cat. No. 2001.0. Downloaded 28th August 2007.
  6. Bateman, H. (2006). Recent superannuation reforms: Choice and flexibility in retirement. Australian Accounting Review, 16(3), 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belsky, E. (2008). Housing Wealth Effects and the Course of the US Economy: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications, Joint Center for Housing Studies Working Paper W08-7. Downloaded 9th December 2008.
  8. Beverly, S., Sherraden, M., Zhan, M., Williams-Shanks, T., Nam, Y., & Cramer, R. (2008). Determinants of asset building. Urban Institute. Downloaded 10th July 2008.
  9. Boehm, T., & Schlottmann, A. (2004). Wealth accumulation and homeownership: Evidence for low-income households, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Downloaded 10th July 2008.
  10. Botsman, P., & Latham, M. (Eds.). (2001). The enabling state: People before bureaucracy. Annandale: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bradbury, B. (2008). ‘Housing wealth as retirement saving: Does the Australian model lead to over-consumption of housing?’ Luxembourg Wealth Study Working Paper No. 7. Downloaded 16th April 2009.
  12. Bradbury, B., Rossiter, C., & Vipond, J. (1986). Poverty Before and After Housing, Reports and Proceedings No 56, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  13. Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. (1988). Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study Database. Review of Income and Wealth, 34, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castles, F. (1997). The institutional design of the Australian Welfare State. International Social Security Review, 50(2), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castles, F. (1998). The really big trade-off: Home ownership and the welfare state in the New World and the Old. Acta Politica, 33(1), 5–19.Google Scholar
  16. Churi, M., & Jappelli, T. (2006). Do the elderly reduce housing equity? An international comparison, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 436. Downloaded 7th July 2008.
  17. Commission of Inquiry into Poverty (the Henderson Report). (1975). Poverty in Australia, first main report (Vol. 1). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  18. DeWilde, C., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2008). The trade-off between home-ownership and pensions: Individual and institutional determinants of old-age poverty. Ageing and Society, 28, 805–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiPasquale, D., & Wheaton, W. (1994). Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Disney, R., & Whitehouse, E. (2002) The Economic Well-Being of Older People in International Perspective: A Critical Review, MPRA Paper No. 10398. Downloaded 22nd April, 2009.
  21. Frick, J., & Grabka, M. (2003). Imputed rent and income inequality: A decomposition analysis for Great Britain, West Germany and the U.S. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert, N., & Gilbert, B. (1989). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Green, R., & Malpezzi, S. (2003). U.S. housing markets and housing policy, AREUEA monograph series no. 3. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  24. Green, R., Malpezzi, S., & Mayo, S. (2005). Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of supply of housing, and their sources. American Economic Review, 95(2), 334–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harmer, J. (2008). Pension review background paper, Appendix C. Department of Families, Housing and Community Affairs. Downloaded 31st October 2008.
  26. Holzman, R., & Hinz, R. (2005). Old-age income support in the 21st century an international perspective on pension systems and reform. World Bank: Washington, D.C.
  27. Jones, M. (1990). The Australian welfare state, Third Edition. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, cited in Castles, F. (1998).Google Scholar
  28. Kemeny, J. (1977). A political sociology of home ownership in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 13(1), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemeny, J. (2001). Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemeny, J. (2005). “The Really Big Trade-Off” between home ownership and welfare: Castles’ evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on. Housing Theory and Society, 22(2), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, A. (1998). Income poverty since the early 1970s. In R. Fincher & J. Nieuwenhuysen (Eds.), Australian poverty: Then and now. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Malpass, P. (2008). Housing and the New Welfare State: Wobbly Pillar or cornerstone? Housing Studies, 23(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meen, G. (2002). The time series behaviour of house prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 11(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Housing Supply Council. (2009). State of Supply Report, Canberra: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Downloaded 22nd April 2009.
  35. Nielson, L. (2006). An adequate superannuation-based retirement income? Parliamentary Library Research Brief, no. 12, 2005–06. Downloaded 6th June 2008.
  36. Nielson, L. (2007). An adequate superannuation-based retirement income? Parliamentary Library Research Paper, 1 August 2007, no. 2, 2007–08. Downloaded 6th June 2008.
  37. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Paris: OECD.,3343,en_2649_33933_41460917_1_1_1_1,00.html. Downloaded 23rd October 2008.
  38. Ritakallio, V.-M. (2003). The importance of housing costs in cross-national comparisons of welfare (state) outcomes. International Social Security Review, 56(2), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothman, G. (2007). The adequacy of Australian retirement incomes—new estimates incorporating the better super reforms. In Paper presented to the Fifteenth Colloquium of Superannuation Researchers, University of New South Wales, 19 & 20 July 2007, Conference Paper 07/1. Downloaded 1st May 2008.
  40. Rothman, G., & Bingham, C. (2004). Retirement income adequacy revisited. In: Conference Paper 2004/1, Paper presented to the Twelfth Colloquium of Superannuation Researchers, University of New South Wales, 12 & 13 July 2004. Downloaded 1st May 2008.
  41. Saunders, P. (1994). Welfare and inequality: National and international perspectives on the Australian welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Saunders, P., Patulny, R., & Lee, A. (2004). Updating and Extending Indicative Budget Standards for Older Australians, prepared for the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia, SPRC Report 2/04. Downloaded 9th June 2008.
  43. Senate Select Committee on Superannuation. (2002). Superannuation and standards of living in retirement, A report on the adequacy of the tax arrangements for superannuation and related policy. Downloaded 30th May 2008.
  44. Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs. (2008). A decent quality of life, inquiry into the cost of living pressures on older Australians. Downloaded 9th June 2008.
  45. Sherraden, M. (2005). Assets and public policy. In M. Sherraden (Ed.), Inclusion in the American dream: Assets, poverty and public policy (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Torgersen, U. (1987). Housing The Wobbly Pillar under the welfare state. In J. Kemeny, L. Lundqvist, & B. Turner (Eds.), Between state and market. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell International.Google Scholar
  47. Treasury. (2001). Towards higher retirement incomes for Australians: a history of the Australian retirement income system since Federation. Economic Roundup, Centenary Edition 2001. Downloaded December 1st 2001.
  48. Treasury. (2002). Submission to the inquiry into superannuation and standards of living in retirement, Senate Select Committee on Superannuation. Downloaded 30th May 2008.
  49. Tsatsaronis, K., & Zhu, H. (2004). What drives housing price dynamics: Cross-country evidence. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2004. Downloaded 4th January 2005.
  50. Whiteford, P., & Kennedy, S. (1995). Incomes and Living Standards of Older People: A Comparative Analysis, UK Department of Social Security, Research Report number. 34, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  51. Whiteford, P., & Whitehouse, E. (2006). Pension challenges and pension reforms in OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Bank. (1994). Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Yates, J., & Bradbury, B. (2009). “Home ownership as a (crumbling) fourth pillar of social insurance in Australia”, Luxembourg Wealth Study Working Paper No. 8. Downloaded 16th April 2009.
  54. Yates, J., Kendig, H., Phillips, B., Milligan V., & Tanton, R. (2008). Sustaining fair shares: The Australian housing system and intergenerational sustainability, AHURI National Research Venture 3: Housing Affordability for Lower Income Australians, Research Paper 11. Downloaded 23rd February 2008.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EconomicsUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Social Policy Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations