Relationship Between Tick Activity, Tick-Borne Diseases, Cognitive and Affective Risk Assessment in Peri-domestic Areas


Peri-domestic areas constitute an important source of tick exposure and tick-borne diseases (TBD). Nonetheless, the association between distal TBD risk factors (i.e. cognitive-/affective-risk perceptions, knowledge of the effectiveness of personal protective behaviors) and proximal TBD risk (i.e. tick activity and TBD diagnosis), among adult residents of private residential properties (PRP) is unknown. Data was collected from 299 PRP in south and central Indiana. We used Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric tests to identify differences in proximal and distal outcome measures. We found evidence of ‘tick activity’ at thirty-nine percent of PRP (n = 116). Thirteen-percent of respondents (n = 40) self-reported a TBD diagnosis within their household. We found no significant association between ‘self-reported TBD diagnosis within a household’ and ‘tick activity in the peri-domestic area.’ Mean scores on ‘affective tick & TBD risk assessment’ were significantly higher among respondents when ‘tick activity’ was present in the peri-domestic area (median = 2, M = 2.54, p < 0.001). Similarly, respondents who ‘self-reported TBD diagnosis within their household’ had significantly higher mean scores on ‘affective tick & TBD risk assessment’ (median = 3, M = 3.30) than those who did not (median = 1, M = 1.93), (U = 2750, p < 0.001). The proportion of peri-domestic areas with ‘tick activity’ was significantly higher if the primary respondent was male or an older adult respectively, compared to females and younger adults. Occupational/recreation-based settings may be more important pathways of tick exposure than peri-domestic settings in Indiana. Beyond education, it is important to consider the feelings and emotions that are elicited when at-risk populations consider their peri-domestic tick exposure and TBD risk, and where necessary design interventions to address those affective assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Ogden, N. H., & Lindsay, L. R. (2016). Effects of climate and climate change on vectors and vector-borne diseases: Ticks are different. Trends in Parasitology, 32(8), 646–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sonenshine, D. E. (2018). Range expansion of tick disease vectors in North America: Implications for spread of tick-borne disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Geographic distribution of ticks that bite humans. Retrieved January 31, 2020, from

  4. 4.

    Biggs, H. M., et al. (2016). Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States: A practical guide for health care and public health professionals. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports, 65(2), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Preventing tick bites. Retrieved June 22, 2017, from

  6. 6.

    National Recreation and Park Association. (2020). New survey reveals Americans’ top outdoor recreation activities. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from

  7. 7.

    Stafford, III, K. C. (2004). Tick management handbook. An integrated guide for homeowners, pest control operators and public health officials for the prevention of tick-associated diseases. New Haven, CT: The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Steere, A. C., et al. (1977). An epidemic of oligoarticular arthritis in children and adults in three Connecticut communities. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 20(1), 7–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mast, W. E., & Burrows, W. M. (1976). Erythema chronicum migrans in the United States. JAMA, 236(7), 859–860.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Falco, R. C., & Fish, D. (1988). Prevalence of Ixodes dammini near the homes of Lyme disease patients in Westchester County, New York. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127(4), 826–830.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stafford, III, K. C., Williams, S. C., & Molaei, G. (2017). Integrated pest management in controlling ticks and tick-associated diseases. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 8(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Omodior, O., Kianersi, S., & Luetke, M. (2019). Prevalence of risk and protective factors for tick exposure and tick-borne disease among residents of Indiana. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice JPHMP.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bayles, B. R., Evans, G., & Allan, B. F. (2013). Knowledge and prevention of tick-borne diseases vary across an urban-to-rural human land-use gradient. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 4(4), 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mowbray, F., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2014). Predictors of protective behaviour against ticks in the UK: A mixed methods study. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 5(4), 392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Omodior, O., et al. (2020). Predictors of tick exposure risk-reduction behavior in Indiana. Journal of Community Health.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Donohoe, H., Omodior, O., & Roe, J. (2018). Tick-borne disease occupational risks and behaviors of Florida Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Service employees—A health belief model perspective. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 22, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Salkeld, D. J., et al. (2019). Time of year and outdoor recreation affect human exposure to ticks in California, United States. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 10(5), 1113–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kianersi, S., et al. (2020). Associations between personal protective measures and self-reported tick-borne disease diagnosis in Indiana residents. Journal of Community Health, 44(6), 1111–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wilson, J. G., et al. (1972). Chemo-attraction in the lone star tick (Acarina: Ixodidae): I. Response of different developmental stages to carbon dioxide administered via traps. Journal of Medical Entomology, 9(3), 245–252.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schaller, T. K., & Malhotra, N. K. (2015). Affective and cognitive components of attitudes in high-stakes decisions: An application of the theory of planned behavior to hormone replacement therapy use. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 678–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mead, P., et al. (2017). Risk factors for tick exposure in suburban settings in the Northeastern United States. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 9(2), 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nieto, N. C., et al. (2018). Using citizen science to describe the prevalence and distribution of tick bite and exposure to tick-borne diseases in the United States. PLoS ONE, 7, e0199644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Loewenstein, G. F., et al. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—The pinnacle patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 780–781.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. (2020). Anaplasmosis—Epidemiology and statistics. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from

  28. 28.

    Schwartz, A. M., et al. (2017). Surveillance for Lyme disease—United States, 2008–2015. Surveillance Summaries, 66(22), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    United States Census Bureau. (2019). QuickFacts: Indiana. Suitland, MD: United States Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Newell, S. A., et al. (1999). The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: A critical review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 17(3), 211–229.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lohr, B., et al. (2018). Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: Current state of the art and future perspectives. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 55(4), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Haddad, E., et al. (2019). Holistic approach in patients with presumed lyme borreliosis leads to less than 10% of confirmation and more than 80% of antibiotic failures. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 68(12), 2060–2066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oghenekaro Omodior.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no actual or potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PNG 4 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omodior, O., Anderson, K. Relationship Between Tick Activity, Tick-Borne Diseases, Cognitive and Affective Risk Assessment in Peri-domestic Areas. J Community Health 46, 334–342 (2021).

Download citation


  • Peri-domestic area
  • Tick exposure
  • Tick-borne disease
  • Cognitive and affective risk assessment