Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient engagement in primary care leadership is an important means to involve community voices at community health centers. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are mandated to have patient representation within their governing boards, while practices seeking patient-centered medical home certification receive credit for implementing patient advisory councils (PACs). Our objective was to compare and contrast how community health centers engage patients in clinic management, decision-making and planning within governing boards versus PACs. Qualitative study conducted from August 2016 to June 2017 at community health centers in California, Arizona and Hawaii. We interviewed practice leaders of patient engagement programs at their site. Eligible clinics had patient representatives within their governing board, PAC, or both. We assessed patient demographics, roles and responsibilities of patients participating, and extent of involvement in quality improvement among governing boards versus PACs. We interviewed 19 sites, of which 17 were FQHCs that had governing boards. Of the 17 FQHCs, 11 had also implemented PACs. Two non-FQHC safety-net sites had PACs but did not have governing boards. Governing board members had formal, structured membership responsibilities such as finances and hiring personnel. PAC roles were more flexible, focusing on day-to-day clinic operations. Clinics tended to recruit governing board patient members for their skill set and professional experience; PAC member recruitment focused more on demographic representation of the clinic’s patient population. Both groups worked on quality improvement, but governing boards tended to review clinic performance metrics, while PAC members were involved in specific project planning and implementation to improve clinical outcomes and patient experience. Patient involvement in clinic improvement in CHCs includes higher-level decision-making and governance through mechanisms such as governing boards, as well as engagement in day-to-day practice improvement through PACs. These roles offer differing, but valuable insights to clinic programs and policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willard-Grace, R., Sharma, A. E., Charla Parker, M., & Potter, M. B. (2016). Engaging patients as partners in practice improvement: A survey of community health centers. JCOM, 23(7), 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arkind, J., Likumahuwa-Ackman, S., Warren, N., et al. (2015). Lessons learned from developing a patient engagement panel: An OCHIN report. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(5), 632–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Association of Community Health Centers. (2018). Retrieved April 11, 2018 from http://www.nachc.com/.

  4. Neuhausen, K., Grumbach, K., Bazemore, A., & Phillips, R. L. (2012). Integrating community health centers into organized delivery systems can improve access to subspecialty care. Health Affairs, 31(8), 1708–1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Administration HRS. (2018). Health center program look-alikes. https://bphc.hrsa.gov/programopportunities/lookalike/index.html.

  6. Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USCS § 254b) Authorizing Legislation of the Health Center Program. Retrieved April 24, 2015 from http://bphc.hrsa.gov/policiesregulations/legislation/.

  7. Seifert, M. H. Jr.. (1983). The patient advisory council concept. Paper presented at Community Oriented Primary Care: New Directions for Health Services Delivery: Conference Proceedings in National Academic Press, Washington, DC

  8. NCQA. (2015). PCMH 2011-PCMH 2014 Crosswalk.

  9. Comparing State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Governance Models. The Commonwealth Fund (2015).

  10. Shortell, S. M., Sehgal, N. J., Bibi, S., et al. (2015). An early assessment of accountable care organizations’ efforts to engage patients and their families. Medical Care Research and Review, 72(5), 580–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, A. E., Willard-Grace, R., Willis, A., et al. (2016). “How can we talk about patient-centered care without patients at the table?” Lessons learned from patient advisory councils. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 29(6), 775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., Manley, C., et al. (2002). Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 325(7375), 1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mockford, C., Staniszewska, S., Griffiths, F., & Herron-Marx, S. (2012). The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: A systematic review. International Journal of Quality Health Care, 24(1), 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma, A. E., Knox, M., Mleczko, V. L., & Olayiwola, J. N. (2017). The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Averill, J. B. (2002). Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research., 12(6), 855–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright, B. (2013). Who governs federally qualified health centers? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 38(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, D. B., & Ricketts, T. C. (2013). When patients govern: Federal grant funding and uncompensated care at federally qualified health centers. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(2), 954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patient Engagement Series: Diversity and Language. Center for Care Innovations and UCSF Center for Excellence in Primary Care. Retrieved April 13, 2018 from https://www.careinnovations.org/resources/engagement-webinar-3-diversity-and-language-in-patient-engagement/

  20. Norman, N., Bennett, C., Cowart, S., et al. (2013). Boot camp translation: A method for building a community of solution. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM. 26(3), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zittleman, L., Emsermann, C., Dickinson, M., et al. (2009). Increasing colon cancer testing in rural Colorado: Evaluation of the exposure to a community-based awareness campaign. BMC Public Health, 9, 288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. National Association of Community Health Centers. Governance. Retrieved April 13, 2018 from http://www.nachc.org/trainings-and-conferences/governance

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Blue Shield of California Foundation grant number P-23885913 and supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, UCSF-CTSI Grant UL1TR000004, which supported Author 6. The authors are grateful for the interviewees who donated their time as well as additional communication for clarifications and nomination of other interviewers. Thanks to the Center for Care Innovations, the SF Bay CRN (http://accelerate.ucsf.edu/community/sfbaycrn), and the Western Clinicians Network (https://www.westerncliniciansnetwork.org/), who have served as networks for this work as well as a resource for prior work leading to this research question.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjana E. Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Sharma and Ms. Willard-Grace have received honoraria for speaking engagements and providing training webinars on the topic of patient engagement in primary care. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A.E., Huang, B., Knox, M. et al. Patient Engagement in Community Health Center Leadership: How Does it Happen?. J Community Health 43, 1069–1074 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0523-z

Keywords

Navigation