The United States (US) federal government allocates hundreds of billions of dollars to provide resources to Americans with disabilities, older adults, and the poor. The American Community Survey (ACS) influences the distribution of those resources. The specific aim of the project is to introduce health researchers to Public Use Microdata Sample file from 2009 to 2011. The overall goal of our paper is to promote the use of ACS data relevant to disability status. This study provides prevalence estimates of three disability related items for the population at or over the age of 15 years who reside in one of the continental states. When population weights are applied to the 7,198,221 individuals in the sample under analysis, they are said to represent 239,641,088 of their counterparts in the US population. Detailed tabulations by state (provided as Microsoft Excel® spreadsheets in ACS output) clearly show disability prevalence varies from state-to-state. Because analyses of the ACS data have the ability to influence resources aiding individuals with physical mobility challenges, its use should be promoted. Particular attention should be given to monetary allocations which will improve accessibility of the existing built environment for the individuals with mobility impairment.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
United States Census Bureau. How disability data are collected from the American Community Survey. Retrieved Jan 11, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/topics/health/disability/guidance/data-collection-acs.html.
Siordia, C. (2014). Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties. Journal of Social Work and Disability and Rehabilitation, 13(3), 261–267.
Southwestern Pennsylvania Public Transit Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from http://www.spcregion.org/pdf/atwichs/FullFinalHSReport.pdf.
Reamer, A. D. (2010). Surveying for dollars: The role of the American Community Survey in the geographic distribution of federal funds. Washington, D.C.: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.
Herman, E. (2008). The American Community Survey: An introduction to the basics. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 504–519.
Siordia, C. (2014). Detecting “real” population changes with American Community Survey data: The implicit assumption of treating between-year differences as “trends”. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2), 494–509.
Siordia, C. (2013). Are health insurance item allocations in the American Community Survey missing completely at random? Journal of Frailty and Aging, 2(4), 198–204.
Siordia, C. (2015). Disability estimates between same-sex and different-sex couples: Data from the American Community Survey (2009-2011). Sexuality and Disability, 33(1), 107–121.
Siordia, C., & Young, R. L. (2013). Methodological note: Allocation of disability items in the American Community Survey. Disability and Health Journal, 6(2), 149–153.
Siordia, C., & Fox, A. (2013). Public use microdata area fragmentation: Research and policy implications of polygon discontiguity. Spatial Demography, 1(1), 42–56.
United States Government Accountability Office. Legal authority for American Community Survey, B-289852, April 4, 2002. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://www.gao.gov/decisions/other/289852.htm.
Siordia, C., & Le, V. D. (2013). Precision of disability estimates for southeast asians in the American Community Survey 2008-2010 microdata. Central Asian Journal of Global Health. https://doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2012.2166-7403.
United States Census Bureau. (2013). Workers with a disability less likely to be employed, more likely to hold jobs with lower earnings, Census Bureau reports. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2013/cb13-47.html.
World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Siordia, C., & Farias, R. A. (2013). A multilevel analysis on latino’s economic inequality: a test of the minority group threat theory. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), The economic status: Volume of the hispanic population (pp. 65–79). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Singh, G. K., & Lin, S. C. (2013). Marked ethnic, nativity, and socioeconomic disparities in disability and health insurance among US children and adults: The 2008-2010 American Community Survey. BioMed Research International, 2013, 17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/627412.
Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., & Lantz, P. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001). Social Science & Medicine, 69, 964–970.
Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., Bader, M., Morenoff, J. D., & House, J. S. (2008). Mobility disability and the built environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 506–513.
Botticello, A. L., Rohrbach, T., & Cobbold, N. (2015). Differences in the community built environment influence poor perceived health among persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1583–1590.
Sund, T., Iwarsson, S., Anttila, H., & Brandt, A. (2015). Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: A prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 7, 859–870.
Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., et al. (2015). Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 578–588.
Ripat, J. D., Brown, C. L., & Ethans, K. D. (2015). Barriers to wheelchair use in the winter. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1117–1122.
Bazuin, J. T., & Fraser, J. C. (2013). How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography, 45, 292–302.
Krahn, G. L., Fujiura, G., Drum, C. E., Cardinal, B. J., & Nosek, M. A. (2009). The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disability and Health Journal, 2(2), 49–56.
Tate, R. L. (2014). Measuring outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) model, with special reference to participation and environmental factors. In H. S. Levin, D. H. K. Shum & R. C. K. Chan (Eds.), Understanding traumatic brain injury: Current research and future directions (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.
Norwich, B. (2008). Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives and future directions. New York, NY: Routledge.
Koutsogeorgou, E., Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J. E., Cerniauskaite, M., Quintas, R., & Raggi, A. (2014). Social capital, disability, and usefulness of the international classification of functioning, disability and health for the development and monitoring of policy interventions. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1104–1116.
Dorsey, R., & Graham, G. (2011). New HHS data standards for race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status. JAMA, 306(21), 2378–2379.
Office of Minority Health. (2017). Data collection standards for race, ethnicity, primary language, sex, and disability status. Retrieved Jan 14, 2018, from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlid=23.
Gibney, K., Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., et al. (2013). Using disability-adjusted life years to set health-based targets: A novel use of an established burden of disease metric. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3), 439–446.
Fairchild, A., Rosner, L., Colgrove, D., Bayer, J., Fried, R., L (2010). The EXODUS of public health what history can tell us about the future. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 54–63.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Siordia, C., Hoepner, L.A. & Lewis, A.N. Why Public Health Researchers Should Consider Using Disability Data from the American Community Survey. J Community Health 43, 738–745 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0478-0