Abstract
In 2013, South Carolina implemented a multi-year program providing support services for pregnant and parenting teens. Local lead sites were responsible for coordinating service delivery in partnership with other multidisciplinary community-based organizations. We used social network theory and analyses (SNA) to examine changes in partnerships over time. Using two-stage purposeful sampling, we identified three lead sites and their self-reported community partners. We administered two web-based surveys grounded in social network theory that included questions about partnership relationships and organizational characteristics. We calculated selected whole-network measures (size, cohesion, equity, diversity). Following the Year 1 surveys, we reviewed our findings with the lead sites and suggested opportunities to strengthen their respective partnerships. Following the Year 3 surveys, we observed changes across the networks. Survey response rates were 91.5% (43/47) in Year 1 and 68.2% (45/66) in Year 3. By Year 3, the average network size increased from 15.6 to 20.3 organizations. By Year 3, one lead site doubled its measure of network cohesion (connectedness); another lead site doubled in size (capacity). A third lead site, highly dense in Year 1, increased in size but decreased in cohesion by Year 3. Innovative use of SNA findings can help community partnerships identify gaps in capacity or services and organizations needed to fulfill program aims. SNA findings can also improve partnership function by identifying opportunities to improve connectedness or reduce redundancies in program work. The ability of lead sites to strategically reconfigure partnerships can be important to program success and sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, X.-K., Wen, S. W., Fleming, N., Demissie, K., Rhoads, G. G., & Walker, M. (2007). Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: A large population based retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(2), 368–373.
Hoffman, S. D. (2006). By the numbers: The public costs of teen childbearing. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Retrieved from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/pubs/BTN_Full.pdf.
Lanzi, R. G., Bert, S. C., & Jacobs, B. K. & the Centers for the Prevention of Child Neglect. (2009). Depression among a sample of first-time adolescent and adult mothers. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 22(4), 194–202.
Perper, K., Peterson, K., & Manlove, J. (2010). Diploma attainment among teen mothers. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/Files/Child_Trends-2010_01_22_FS_DiplomaAttainment.pdf.
Terry-Humen, E., Manlove, J., & Moore, K. A. (2005). Playing catch-up: How children born to teen mothers fare. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Retrieved from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/pdf/pubs/PlayingCatchUp.pdf.
Advocates for Youth. (2008). Science and success (2nd edn.): Sex education and other programs that work to prevent teen pregnancy, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections. Retrieved from http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/storage/advfy/documents/sciencesuccess.pdf.
Key, J., Gebregziabher, M., Marsh, L., & O’Rourke, K. (2008). Effectiveness of an intensive, school-based intervention for teen mothers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 394–400.
Kirby, D. (2007). Emerging answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Adolescent Health. About PAF. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/grant-programs/pregnancy-assistance-fund/about/index.html.
South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Fact Sheets and Reports: Teen Birth Data, (2017). Retrieved from https://www.teenpregnancysc.org/factsheets-reports.
Cassell, C., Santelli, J., Gilbert, B. C., Dalmat, M., Mezoff, J., & Schauer, M. (2005). Mobilizing communities: An overview of the community coalition partnership programs for the prevention of teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), S3-S10.
Duffy, J. L., Prince, M. S., Johnson, E. E., Alton, F. L., Flynn, S., Faye, A. M., … Hinzey, A. L. (2012). Enhancing teen pregnancy prevention in local communities: Capacity building using the interactive systems framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 370–385.
Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8(3), 315–330.
Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (2nd edn.) (pp. 157–193). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rosenkopf, L., & Schilling, M. A. (2007). Comparing alliance network structure across industries: Observations and explanations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 191–209.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1999). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999(1), A1–A6.
Retrum, J. H., Chapman, C. L., & Varda, D. M. (2013). Implications of network structure on public health collaboratives. Health Education Behavior, 40(1 suppl), 13S-23S.
Chervin, D. D., Philliber, S., Brindis, C. D., Chadwick, A. E., Revels, M. L., Kamin, S. L., & Peterson, S. A. (2005). Community capacity building in CDC’s community coalition partnership programs for the prevention of teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), S11–S19.
Kegler, M. C., Williams, C. W., Cassell, C. M., Santelli, J., Kegler, S. R., Montgomery, S. B., … Will, J. A. (2005). Mobilizing communities for teen pregnancy prevention: Associations between coalition characteristics and perceived accomplishments. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), S31–S41.
Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K., & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603–613.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks (1st edn.). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Prell, C. (2013). Social network analysis: history, theory and methodology (2nd edn.). (pp. 95–116, 166–174). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Kramer, J. S., Philliber, S., Brindis, C. D., Kamin, S. L., Chadwick, A. E., Revels, M. L., … Peterson, S. A. (2005). Coalition models: Lessons learned from the CDC’s community coalition partnership programs for the prevention of teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), S20-S30.
Mays, G. P., & Scutchfield, F. D. (2010). Improving public health system performance through multiorganizational partnerships. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(6), A116.
Mays, G. P., Scutchfield, F. D., Bhandari, M. W., & Smith, S. A. (2010). Understanding the organization of public health delivery systems: An empirical typology. Milbank Quarterly, 88(1), 81–111.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Marsden, P. V., & Lin, N. (Eds.). (1982). Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–139). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Chen, L. W., Roberts, S., Xu, L., Jacobson, J., & Palm, D. (2012). Effectiveness and challenges of regional public health partnerships in Nebraska. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 18(2), 148–155.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCInet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Varda, D., Forgette, R., Banks, D., & Contractor, N. (2009). Social network methodology in the study of disasters: Issues and insights prompted by post-Katrina research. Population Research and Policy Review, 28(1), 11–29.
Varda, D. M., Chandra, A., Stern, S. A., & Lurie, N. (2008). Core dimensions of connectivity in public health collaboratives. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(5), E1–7.
Valente, T. W., Chou, C. P., & Pentz, M. A. (2007). Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 880–886.
Mendel, P., Damberg, C. L., Sorbero, M. E. S., Varda, D. M., & Farley, D. O. (2009). The growth of partnerships to support patient safety practice adoption. Health Services Research, 44(2p2), 717–738.
Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 65–79.
Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28(3), 247–268.
Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group and Organization Management, 35(2), 177–212.
Bevc, C. A., Retrum, J. H., & Varda, D. M. (2015). New perspectives on the “silo effect”: Initial comparisons of network structures across public health collaboratives. American Journal of Public Health, 105(Suppl 2), S230–S235.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.
Luke, D. A., & Harris, J. K. (2007). Network analysis in public health: History, methods, and applications. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 69–93.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy for their support with data accessibility and acquisition. We also thank Erica Sercy, MSPH with the University of South Carolina, for her editorial review.
Funding
Supported in part by Grant 11550FL24 to the University of South Carolina from Children’s Trust of South Carolina. Community Support for Young Parents is a program of Children’s Trust of SC and the SC Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. The program is administered by the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Adolescent Health. Contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Office of Adolescent Health. CFDA No. 93 500, Grant No.SP1AH000030-04-00.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial relationships to disclose relevant to this article.
Ethical Approval
The Institutional Review Board at the University of South Carolina approved this evaluation research under Protocol #00040407.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from participants as part of the survey administration process.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radcliff, E., Hale, N., Browder, J. et al. Building Community Partnerships: Using Social Network Analysis to Strengthen Service Networks Supporting a South Carolina Program for Pregnant and Parenting Teens. J Community Health 43, 273–279 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0417-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0417-5