Parents’ Expectations of High Schools in Firearm Violence Prevention
- 1.3k Downloads
Firearm violence remains a significant problem in the US (with 2787 adolescents killed in 2015). However, the research on school firearm violence prevention practices and policies is scant. Parents are major stakeholders in relation to firearm violence by youths and school safety in general. The purpose of this study was to examine what parents thought schools should be doing to reduce the risk of firearm violence in schools. A valid and reliable questionnaire was mailed to a national random sample of 600 parents who had at least one child enrolled in a public secondary school (response rate = 47%). Parents perceived inadequate parental monitoring/rearing practices (73%), peer harassment and/or bullying (58%), inadequate mental health care services for youth (54%), and easy access to guns (51%) as major causes of firearm violence in schools. The school policies perceived to be most effective in reducing firearm violence were installing an alert system in schools (70%), working with law enforcement to design an emergency response plan (70%), creating a comprehensive security plan (68%), requiring criminal background checks for all school personnel prior to hiring (67%), and implementing an anonymous system for students to report peer concerns regarding potential violence (67%). Parents seem to have a limited grasp of potentially effective interventions to reduce firearm violence.
KeywordsFirearm Violence Schools Parents Prevention Children
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Drs. Payton, Khubchandani, Thompson, and Price have no conflict of interest to declare for this research.
- 1.Children’s Defense Fund. (2013). Protect children not guns. Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund.Google Scholar
- 2.Butkus, R., Doherty, R., Downey, H., & American College of Physicians Health and Public Policy Committee. (2014). Reducing firearm-related injuries and deaths in the United States: Executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 160, 858–860.Google Scholar
- 4.Cohen, A. O., Breiner, K., Steinberg, L., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S., Taylor-Thompson, K. A., Rudolph, M. D., Chein, J., Richeson, J. A., Heller, A. S., Silverman, M. R. (2016) When is an adolescent an adult? Assessing cognitive control in emotional and nonemotional contexts. Psychological Science, 24, 0956797615627625.Google Scholar
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WISQARS (Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). (2017). Retrieved February 9, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/.
- 7.Schwebel, D. C., Lewis, T., Simon, T. R., Elliott, M. N., Toomey Sl, Tortolero, S. R., Cuccaro, P. M., & Schuster, M. A. (2014). Prevalence and correlates of firearm ownership in the homes of fifth graders: Birmingham, AL, Houston, TX and Los Angeles, CA. Health Education and Behavior, 20(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
- 17.Weil, D. S., & Hemenway, D. (1992). Loaded guns in the home: Analysis of a national random survey of gun owners. Journal of the American Medical Association, 150(3), 265–269.Google Scholar
- 21.US Department of Education. (2017). What are the new back to school statistics for 2016? Retrieved February 9, 2017, from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372.
- 26.Raosoft, Inc. (2017). Sample size calculator. Retrieved March 18, 2017, from http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.
- 27.Zhang, A., Musu-Gillette, L., Oudekerk, B. A. (2015). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2015. NCES 2016-079. NCJ 249758. National Center for Education Statistics, May 2016.Google Scholar
- 29.Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105.Google Scholar
- 33.Vossekuil, B. (2002) The final report and findings of the safe school initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Collingdale, PA: Diane Publishing.Google Scholar