Implementation of the Community Health Assistant (CHA) Cadre in Zambia: A Process Evaluation to Guide Future Scale-Up Decisions
- 365 Downloads
Universal health coverage requires an adequate health workforce, including community health workers (CHWs) to reach rural communities. To improve healthcare access in rural areas, in 2010 the Government of Zambia implemented a national CHW strategy that introduced a new cadre of healthcare workers called community health assistants (CHAs). After 1 year of training the pilot class of 307 CHAs deployed in September 2012. This paper presents findings from a process evaluation of the barriers and facilitators of implementation of the CHA pilot, along with how evidence was used to guide ongoing implementation and scale-up decisions. Qualitative inquiry was used to assess implementation during the first 6 months of the program rollout, with 43 in-depth individual and 32 small group interviews across five respondent types: CHAs, supervisors, volunteer CHWs, community members, and district leadership. Potential ‘implementation moderators’ were explored using deductive coding and thematic analysis of participant perspectives on community acceptance of CHAs, supervision support mechanisms, and coordination with volunteer CHWs, and health system integration of a new cadre. Community acceptance of CHAs was generally high, but coordination between CHAs and existing volunteer CHWs presented some challenges. The supervision support system was found to be inconsistent, limiting assurance of consistent quality care delivered by CHAs. Underlying health system weaknesses regarding drug supply and salary payments furthermore hindered incorporation of a new cadre within the national health system. Recommendations for implementation and future scale based on the process evaluation findings are discussed.
KeywordsCommunity health workers Human resources for health Qualitative process evaluation Zambia Health systems strengthening
The process evaluation was made possible through funding support from UKAid/DFID of the UK Government. The authors would like to acknowledge the collaborative support of the Zambian Ministry of Health and Ministry of Community Development, Mother and Child in carrying out the process evaluation. We would also like to thank all interview participants, including the staff of the participating District Health Offices and health facilities, for sharing their invaluable perspectives on the rollout of the CHA program. The field interview team of Nomsa Manda, Lungowe Lubaba, and Makasa Chilatu are acknowledged for conducting interviews and providing transcription support. We thank our colleagues at DFID, particularly Meena Gandhi, for their support and feedback through this evaluation and in the implementation of the program. During the process evaluation design stage, we are thankful for the technical support on qualitative research methods provided by Dr. Bobbie Person (CDC). The staff of the CHAI Zambia office is greatly acknowledged for their logistical support throughout the evaluation. Special thanks to Margaret Lippitt Prust for her review and input on the manuscript. The views expressed in this article are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies of DFID or the UK Government.
KBV, YWB, and MM conceived of the process evaluation assessment. YWB and KDS drafted the process evaluation protocol and designed the data collection tools with input from KBV and MM. KDS, YWB, and the field interviewers collected and transcribed all interview data; KDS and YWB analyzed the data and jointly drafted a programmatic report documenting all evaluation results and recommendations. KBV and YWB worked with ministry counterparts (MM, ECK, EMM and CPC) to share process evaluation results and discuss recommended actions. KDS wrote the first draft of the manuscript; YWB, KBV, JWvdB and SP provided substantial revisions. All co-authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) through C.C. 200667-102 P/O 40034923.
- 1.Murphy, G. T., Goma, F., MacKenzie, A., Bradish, S., Price, S., Nzala, S., et al. (2014). A scoping review of training and deployment policies for human resources for health for maternal, newborn, and child health in rural Africa. Human Resources for Health, 12(1), 72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.WHO. (2006). Working together for health: World health report 2006. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
- 3.Lehmann, U., & Sanders, D. (2007). Community health workers: What do we know about them?. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
- 5.WHO. (2013). The world health report 2013: Research for universal health coverage. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
- 8.WHO. (1989). Strengthening the performance of community health workers in primary health care. Technical report series 780. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- 9.Perry, H., & Crigler, L. (2014). Developing and strengthening community health worker programs at scale: Guidance for program managers and policy makers. Washington, DC: USAID, MCHIP.Google Scholar
- 10.CIA. (2014). Zambia. The World Factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/za.html
- 11.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. (2013). Global burden of disease country profile: Zambia. Seattle, Washington. Retrieved from www.healthdata.org/zambia
- 12.UNAIDS. (2015). How AIDS changed everything—MDG 6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the AIDS response. Retrieved from http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/MDG6Report_en.pdf
- 13.WHO. (2014). World malaria report 2014. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2014/en/
- 14.Zambia Central Statistical Office. (2013). Zambia demographic and health survey 2013–2014: Preliminary report. Retrieved from http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR53/PR53.pdf
- 15.Kamwanga, J., Koyi, G., Mwila, J., Musonda, M., & Bwalya, R. (2013). Understanding the labour market of human resources for health in Zambia.Google Scholar
- 18.MOH Zambia. (2009). Concept note for the development of a community health worker national strategy. Lusaka, Zambia: MOH Zambia.Google Scholar
- 19.MOH Zambia. (2010). National community health worker strategy in Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: MOH Zambia.Google Scholar
- 21.Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Tailoring evaluations. Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed., pp. 31–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- 24.MOH Zambia. (2011). Republic of Zambia: National human resources for health strategic plan 2011–2015. Lusaka, Zambia: MOH Zambia.Google Scholar
- 25.MOH Zambia. (2013). The 2012 List of Health Facilities in Zambia: Preliminary Report, v15. Lusaka: Zambia.Google Scholar
- 26.NCH Software, version 5.63. (2013). Express scribe. Canberra, Australia: NHC Software. Retrieved from http://www.nch.com.au/scribe/index.html
- 27.VERBI Software – Consult – Sozialforschung GmbH. (2013). MAXQDA, software for qualitative data analysis, 1998–2014. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- 28.Zhang, Y., & Wildermuth, B. M. (2005). Qualitative analysis of content. Analysis, 1(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
- 29.Zulu, J. M., Kinsman, J., Michelo, C., & Hurtig, A.-K. (2014). Integrating national community-based health worker programmes into health systems: A systematic review identifying lessons learned from low-and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 987.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar