The Use of Social Media by State Health Departments in the US: Analyzing Health Communication Through Facebook
The use of social media as a powerful health communication tool is an area of current research interest. Our objective was to describe use of Facebook by State Health Departments (SHDs) in US, and their relationship with CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. Facebook pages of 34 SHDs were studied over a 200 day period, coding 2597 posts into 19 broad health communication categories. Mean number of Facebook posts per SHD was 76.4 (range 34–133); most frequent topic areas included healthy living (12 %), communicable diseases (9 %), vaccines and immunization (7 %), emergency preparedness and response (7 %), infant and child health (5 %), smoking and tobacco use (5 %), and miscellaneous (32 %). Through web-based interactive graphics (Google motion charts), we contrasted Facebook posts with CDC’s BRFSS data on adult nutrition and physical activity, vaccination, smoking, adolescent health and road traffic accidents. Our research finds an apparent disconnect between content provided on Facebook by SHDs and the health conditions that affect their populations. Acknowledging the severe limitations in funding and human resources faced by the SHDs, our research attempts to present the factual situation in embracing a vastly popular social media platform for health communication. We believe there is a need for research exploring methods to balance the demands and resources.
KeywordsSocial media Health communication State Health Department Facebook CDC
We acknowledge funding support from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cooperative agreement numbers: 1U90TP000417-05 (Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Center) and 5PO1TP000307-05 (Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center) Supplement. The content of this publication as well as the views and discussions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any partner organizations, the CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 2.CDC USA. (2012a). CDC’s Guide to Writing for Social Media. http://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/pdf/guidetowritingforsocialmedia.pdf
- 3.CDC USA. (2012b). Sortable Risk Factors and Health Indicators. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. www.cdc.gov/sortablestats/
- 5.Department of Health and Human Services, U. (2014). Centers for disease control and prevention. Retrieved December 15, 2013, from http://www.cdc.gov/
- 6.Duggan, M., & Brennar, J. (2012). The demographics of social media users—2012. Pew Research Center’s internet and American life project, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/14/the-demographics-of-social-media-users-2012/
- 7.Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Pew research center’s internet and American life project. Health online. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
- 8.Google Developers. (2014). Google charts. Retrieved June, 2014, from https://developers.google.com/chart/interactive/docs/gallery/motionchart
- 10.Heldman, A. B., Schindelar, J., & Weaver, J. B. I. (2013). Social media engagement and public health communication: implications for public health organizations being truly “social”. Public Health Reviews, 35, 1.Google Scholar
- 11.Jha, A. (2014). Personal interviews with Massachusetts Department of Public Health, New York State Department of Health, CDC Atlanta, National Public Health Information Coalition.Google Scholar
- 12.Lin, L., Jung, M., McCloud, R. F., & Viswanath, K. (2014). Media use and communication inequalities in a public health emergency: A case study of 2009–2010 pandemic influenza a virus subtype H1N1. Public Health Reports, 129(Supplement 4), 1–19.Google Scholar
- 14.Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013). A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.NPHIC. (2014). NPHIC Newsletters. http://www.nphic.org/news/newsletters
- 20.Yip, M. P., Ong, B., Painter, I., Meischke, H., Calhoun, B., & Tu, S. P. (2009). Information-seeking behaviors and response to the H1N1 outbreak in Chinese limited-English proficient individuals living in King County, Washington. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 4(6), 353–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar