Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections

Abstract

Technology-related distracted behavior is an emergent national concern. Listening to, looking at or talking into an electronic device while walking divides attention, increasing the risk of injury. The purpose of this study was to quantify technology-related distracted pedestrian behavior at five dangerous and busy Manhattan intersections. Data were collected over ten cycles of signal changes at each of the four corners of five intersections at four times of day. Data for ‘Walk’ and ‘Don’t Walk’ signals were tallied separately. A total of 21,760 pedestrians were observed. Nearly one-third crossing on a ‘Walk’ signal (n = 5414, 27.8 %), and nearly half crossing on a ‘Don’t Walk’ signal (n = 974; 42.0 %) were wearing headphones, talking on a mobile phone, and/or looking down at an electronic device. Headphone use was the most common distraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Smith, D., Schreiber, K., Saltos, A., et al. (2013). Ambulatory cell phone injuries in the United States: An emerging national concern. Journal Safety Research, 47, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nasar, J., & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57, 91–95.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lichenstein, R., Smith, D., Ambrose, J., & Moody, L. (2012). Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004–2011. Injury Prevention, 18, 287–290.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    NYPD: 16,059 pedestrians and cyclists injured, 178 killed in traffic in 2013. Street Blog WebSite. http://www.streetsblog.org/2014/01/31/nypd-16059-pedestrians-and-cyclists-injured-178-killed-in-traffic-in-2013/. Accessed September 14, 2014.

  5. 5.

    Vision Zero Action Plan 2014. Vision Zero Web Site. http://www.nyc.gov/html/visionzero/pdf/nyc-vision-zero-action-plan.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2014.

  6. 6.

    Stavrinos, D., Byington, K., & Schwebel, D. (2009). Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics, 123, e179–e185.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schwebel, D., Stavrinos, D., Byington, K., et al. (2012). Distraction and pedestrian safety: How talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 266–271.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hatfield, J., & Murphy, S. (2007). The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalised and unsignalised intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 197–205.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bungum, T., Day, C., & Henry, L. (2005). The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk. Journal of Community Health, 30, 269–279.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Strayer, D., & Drews, F. (2007). Cell-phone–induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hosking, S., Young, K., & Regan, M. (2009). The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Human Factors, 51, 582–592.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Basch, C., Ethan, D., Rajan, S., & Basch, C. (2014). Technology-related distracted walking behaviors in Manhattan’s most dangerous intersections. Injury Prevention, 20, 343–346.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Top Ten Intersections by Crash and Borough. Crashstat Web Site. http://crashstat.org/sites/default/files/dangerous/Top%20Ten%20Intersections%20by%20Crash%20Type%20and%20Boro.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2014.

  14. 14.

    Department of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts 2010: Pedestrians. Washington (DC). http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811625.PDF. Accessed August 28, 2014.

  15. 15.

    Thompson, L., Rivara, F., Ayyagari, R., et al. (2013). Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behavior: An observational study. Injury Prevention, 4, 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cooper, J. F., Schneider, R. J., Ryan, S., et al. (2012). Documenting targeted behaviors associated with pedestrian safety. Transportation Research Record, 2299, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cheever, N., Rosen, L., Carrier, L., & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of weapons of mass distraction on anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rosen, L. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corey H. Basch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basch, C.H., Ethan, D., Zybert, P. et al. Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections. J Community Health 40, 789–792 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0001-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Technology
  • Distracted
  • Pedestrians
  • Manhattan