Journal of Community Health

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 789–792 | Cite as

Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections

  • Corey H. Basch
  • Danna Ethan
  • Patricia Zybert
  • Charles E. Basch
Original Paper


Technology-related distracted behavior is an emergent national concern. Listening to, looking at or talking into an electronic device while walking divides attention, increasing the risk of injury. The purpose of this study was to quantify technology-related distracted pedestrian behavior at five dangerous and busy Manhattan intersections. Data were collected over ten cycles of signal changes at each of the four corners of five intersections at four times of day. Data for ‘Walk’ and ‘Don’t Walk’ signals were tallied separately. A total of 21,760 pedestrians were observed. Nearly one-third crossing on a ‘Walk’ signal (n = 5414, 27.8 %), and nearly half crossing on a ‘Don’t Walk’ signal (n = 974; 42.0 %) were wearing headphones, talking on a mobile phone, and/or looking down at an electronic device. Headphone use was the most common distraction.


Technology Distracted Pedestrians Manhattan 


  1. 1.
    Smith, D., Schreiber, K., Saltos, A., et al. (2013). Ambulatory cell phone injuries in the United States: An emerging national concern. Journal Safety Research, 47, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nasar, J., & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57, 91–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lichenstein, R., Smith, D., Ambrose, J., & Moody, L. (2012). Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004–2011. Injury Prevention, 18, 287–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    NYPD: 16,059 pedestrians and cyclists injured, 178 killed in traffic in 2013. Street Blog WebSite. Accessed September 14, 2014.
  5. 5.
    Vision Zero Action Plan 2014. Vision Zero Web Site. Accessed August 28, 2014.
  6. 6.
    Stavrinos, D., Byington, K., & Schwebel, D. (2009). Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics, 123, e179–e185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwebel, D., Stavrinos, D., Byington, K., et al. (2012). Distraction and pedestrian safety: How talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 266–271.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hatfield, J., & Murphy, S. (2007). The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalised and unsignalised intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 197–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bungum, T., Day, C., & Henry, L. (2005). The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk. Journal of Community Health, 30, 269–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strayer, D., & Drews, F. (2007). Cell-phone–induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hosking, S., Young, K., & Regan, M. (2009). The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Human Factors, 51, 582–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basch, C., Ethan, D., Rajan, S., & Basch, C. (2014). Technology-related distracted walking behaviors in Manhattan’s most dangerous intersections. Injury Prevention, 20, 343–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Top Ten Intersections by Crash and Borough. Crashstat Web Site. Accessed August 28, 2014.
  14. 14.
    Department of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts 2010: Pedestrians. Washington (DC). Accessed August 28, 2014.
  15. 15.
    Thompson, L., Rivara, F., Ayyagari, R., et al. (2013). Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behavior: An observational study. Injury Prevention, 4, 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper, J. F., Schneider, R. J., Ryan, S., et al. (2012). Documenting targeted behaviors associated with pedestrian safety. Transportation Research Record, 2299, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheever, N., Rosen, L., Carrier, L., & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of weapons of mass distraction on anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosen, L. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corey H. Basch
    • 1
  • Danna Ethan
    • 2
  • Patricia Zybert
    • 3
  • Charles E. Basch
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Public HealthWilliam Paterson UniversityWayneUSA
  2. 2.Health Education and Promotion ProgramLehman College, The City University of New YorkBronxUSA
  3. 3.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Health Education at Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations