Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Overdue Population: Participation and Cost Impacts of Adding Telephone Calls to a FIT Mailing Program
- 276 Downloads
Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned ($27.43 vs. $44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.
KeywordsColorectal cancer screening Fecal immunochemical test Intervention Cost comparison
- 1.American Cancer Society. (2013). Colorectal cancer overview. Retrieved 2013, from http://www.cancer.org/cancer/colonandrectumcancer/overviewguide/colorectal-cancer-overview-key-statistics.
- 4.Klabunde, C. N., Joseph, D. A., King, J. B., White, A., & Plescia, M. (2013). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(44), 881–888.Google Scholar
- 11.VHA Office of Rural Health. (2013). Fact Sheet: Information about the Office of Rural Health and Rural Veterans. Retrieved 2013, from http://www.ruralhealth.va.gov/docs/factsheets/ORH_FactSheet_General_April2013.pdf.
- 16.Charlton, M. E., Mengeling, M. A., Halfdanarson, T. R., Makki, N. M., Malhotra, A., Klutts, J. S., et al. (2013). Evaluation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in a rural state. The Journal of Rural Health (in press). Epub ahead of print retrieved December 20, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12052/pdf, http://ajrcmb.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/2004-0309OCv1.
- 23.Janssens, A. C., Henneman, L., Detmar, S. B., Khoury, M. J., Steyerberg, E. W., Eijkemans, M. J., et al. (2012). Accuracy of self-reported family history is strongly influenced by the accuracy of self-reported personal health status of relatives. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(1), 82–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar