Skip to main content
Log in

A community-based approach to disseminate health information on the hazards of prenatal mercury exposure in Brooklyn, NY

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to mercury (Hg) in utero can have neurotoxic effects on the developing fetus. Mercury exposure in women of childbearing age has been associated with frequent fish consumption, coastal proximity, foreign birth, and exposure during ritualistic practices. The aim of this study was to identify culturally-appropriate strategies to disseminate messages on the hazards of in utero Hg exposure in fertile and pregnant women in a predominantly urban immigrant community in Flatbush, Brooklyn, following findings from a recent study on mercury exposure in this community. Nineteen key informant interviews were conducted in Flatbush, Brooklyn with community members, medical professionals, fishmongers, and a religious practitioner to solicit feedback on culturally sensitive methods to educate the community on Hg hazards. The main themes identified include clinical integration, where providers integrate the message in routine care; community integration, whereby influential organizations and community members foster message delivery; media usage; and message reinforcement via continuous exposure. It is vital for healthcare providers and public health practitioners to be culturally sensitive in educating their patients on fish selection during pregnancy and safety of handling Hg. Instead of a single approach, a combination of media and educational strategies would help to reinforce the message. These findings form a basis for public health campaigns to apprise other urban immigrant communities of the hazards of in utero Hg exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bose-O’Reilly, S., McCarty, K. M., Steckling, N., & Lettmeier, B. (2010). Mercury exposure and children’s health. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 40(8), 186–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahaffey, K. R. (2005). Mercury exposure: Medical and public health issues. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 116, 127–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozuah, P. O. (2001). Folk use of elemental mercury: A potential hazard for children? Journal of the National Medical Association, 93(9), 320–322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, K. L., Mortensen, M. E., Jones, R. L., Caudill, S. P., & Osterloh, J. D. (2009). Total blood mercury concentrations in the U.S. population: 1999–2006. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 212(6), 588–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandjean, P., Weihe, P., White, R. F., & Debes, F. (1998). Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to “safe” levels of methylmercury. Environmental Research, 77(2), 165–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, Y., Yan, C. H., Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, H. F., Zhou, X., et al. (2007). (2007) Prenatal exposure to mercury and neurobehavioral development of neonates in Zhoushan City. China Environmental Research, 105(3), 390–399.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trasande, L., Landrigan, P. J., & Schechter, C. (2005). Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(5), 590–596.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Inorganic mercury. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/teach/chem_summ/mercury_inorg_summary.pdf.

  9. Cace, I. B., Milardovic, A., Prpic, I., Krajina, R., Petrovic, O., Vukelic, P., et al. (2011). Relationship between prenatal exposure to low-level mercury and the size of a newborn’s cerebellum. Medical Hypotheses, 76(4), 514–516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber, K. (1997). Wisconsin mercury sourcebook. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Watershed Management. Retrieved January, 2011 from http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/04/03851.htm.

  11. N.Y.C. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene. (2007). Eat fish, choose wisely. New York, NY. Retrieved from www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/edp/mercury_brochure.pdf.

  12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Task force report on ritualistic uses of mercury. Washington DC. Retrieved December, 2011 from www.epa.gov/superfund/ community/pdfs/mercury.pdf.

  13. Rogers, H. S., Jeffrey, N., Kieszak, S., Fritz, P., Spliethoff, H., Palmer, C. D., et al. (2008). Mercury exposure in young children living in New York City. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 85(1), 779–784.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahaffey, K. R., Clickner, R. P., & Bodurow, C. C. (2004). Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National health and nutrition survey, 1999 and 2000. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(5), 562–570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahaffey, K. R., Clickner, R. P., & Jeffries, R. A. (2009). Adult women’s blood mercury concentrations vary regionally in the United States: Association with patterns of fish consumption (NHANES 1999–2004). Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(1), 47–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McKelvey, W., Gwynn, R. C., Jeffery, N., Kass, D., Thorpe, L. E., Garg, R. K., et al. (2007). A Biomonitoring study of lead, cadmium, and mercury in the blood of New York City adults. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(10), 1435–1441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Geer, L., Persad, M. D., Palmer, C. D., Steuerwald, A. J., Dalloul, M., Abulafia, O., et al. (2012). Assessment of prenatal mercury exposure in a predominantly Caribbean immigrant community in Brooklyn, NY. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(3), 1035–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. US Food and Drug Administration. (2012). Mercury poisoning linked to skin products. Washington, D.C. Retrieved March, 2012 from http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ ConsumerUpdates/ucm294849.htm.

  19. Education Development Center. (2004). Key informant interviews. Retrieved March, 2011 from http://www.oasas.state.ny.us/prevention/needs/documents/KeyInformantInterviews.pdf.

  20. Sokol, A. (2003). Health-Risk Communication. Retrieved May, 2011 from: http://www.cwru.edu/med/epidbio/mphp439/Health_Risk.htm.

  21. Fitzpatrick-Lewis, D., Yost, J., Ciliska, D., & Krishnaratne, S. (2010). Communication about environmental health risks: A systematic Review. Environmental Health, 9(67), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Tracey Wilson for her guidance in the qualitative analyses of this paper and Dr. Karen Benker and Natalie Baptiste, MPH for their guidance in key informant question formulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fay P. Callejo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callejo, F.P., Geer, L.A. A community-based approach to disseminate health information on the hazards of prenatal mercury exposure in Brooklyn, NY. J Community Health 37, 745–753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9575-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9575-7

Keywords

Navigation