Skip to main content

Evaluation of Fire-Safety Programs that use 10-Year Smoke Alarms

Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began funding a Smoke Alarm Installation and Fire Safety Education (SAIFE) program in 1998. This program involves the installation of lithium-powered “10-year” smoke alarms in homes at high risk for fires and injuries. This study aimed to (1) determine among original SAIFE homes if the lithium-powered alarms were still present and functional 8–10 years after installation and (2) understand factors related to smoke alarm presence and functionality. Data on a total of 384 homes and 601 smoke alarms in five states were collected and analyzed. Only one-third of alarms were still functional; 37% of installed alarms were missing; and 30% of alarms were present, but not functioning. Alarms were less likely to be functioning if they were installed in the kitchen and if homes had a different resident at follow-up. Of the 351 alarms that were present and had a battery at the time of the evaluation, only 21% contained lithium-powered batteries. Of these, 78% were still functioning. Programs that install lithium-powered alarms should use units that have sealed-in batteries and “hush” buttons. Additionally, education should be given on smoke alarm maintenance that includes a message that batteries in these alarms should not be replaced. Lithium-powered smoke alarms should last up to 10 years if maintained properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Karter, M. J. (2008). Fire loss in the United States during 2007. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roberts, I., & Power, C. (1996). Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991. BMJ, 313, 784–786.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ahrens, M. (2004). U.S. experience with smoke alarms and other fire alarms. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Istre, G. R., McCoy, M. A., Osborn, L., Barnard, J. J., & Bolton, A. (2001). Deaths and injuries from house fires. New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 1911–1916.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shenassa, E. D., Stubbenick, A., & Brown, M. J. (2004). Social disparities in housing and related pediatric injury: A multilevel study. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 633–639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Warda, L. J., & Ballesteros, M. F. (2007). Interventions to prevent residential fire injury. In L. S. Doll, S. E. Bonzo, J. A. Mercy, & D. A. Sleet (Eds.), Handbook of injury and violence prevention (pp. 97–115). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mallonee, S., Istre, G. R., Rosenberg, M., Reddish-Douglas, M., Jordan, F., Silverstein, P., et al. (1996). Surveillance and prevention of residential-fire injuries. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Wade, A., Sculpher, M., Edwards, P., Godward, C., et al. (2002). Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: Cluster randomized controlled trail. BMJ, 325, 995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Harvey, P. A., Aitken, M., Ryan, G. W., Demeter, L. A., Givens, J., Sundararaman, R., et al. (2004). Strategies to increase smoke alarm use in high-risk households. Journal of Community Health, 29, 375–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ballesteros, M. F., Jackson, M. L., & Martin, M. W. (2005). Working toward the elimination of residential fire deaths: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Smoke Alarm Installation and Fire Safety Education (SAIFE) program. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, 26, 434–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mickalide, A., & Validzic, A. (1999). Smoke alarm maintenance of low-income families. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Thompson, C. J., Jones, A. R., Davis, M. K., & Caplan, L. S. (2004). Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the Get-Alarmed Campaign. Journal of Community Health, 29, 171–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shults, R. A., Sacks, J. J., Briske, L. A., Dickey, P. H., Kinde, M. R., Mallonee, S., et al. (1998). Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 165–171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee, A. (2002). Preliminary test results on lithium batteries used in residential smoke alarms. Washington, DC: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thompson, N. J., & McClintock, H. O. (1998). Demonstrating your program’s worth: A primer on evaluation for programs to prevent unintentional injury. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mary Borges from the Washington Department of Health, Robert McCool from the Kentucky Department of Health, Pam Archer from the Oklahoma State Department of Health, Steve Davidson from the Georgia Department of Health, and Lenny Recupero from the Virginia Department of Health, and to all the local fire departments for their assistance provided during this evaluation.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, M., Wilson, J., Akoto, J. et al. Evaluation of Fire-Safety Programs that use 10-Year Smoke Alarms. J Community Health 35, 543–548 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9240-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Smoke alarms
  • Fires
  • Injury prevention
  • Evaluation