Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Walk Texas! 5-A-Day Intervention for Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) Clients: A Quasi-experimental Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the Walk Texas! Clinical Counseling Guide for Nutrition, which is a brief, stage-based nutritional counseling guide designed for use in clinical settings. This study utilized a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design, with two intervention and two comparison clinics that were matched for size and ethnicity. Intervention participants were staged for readiness to meet the 5-A-Day criteria for fruits and vegetables (F&V) and provided stage-based counseling. Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) counselors were trained to utilize the Walk Texas! brief staging instrument and to provide all counseling. Primary measures included: stage of change, barriers to change, attitudes toward F&V, self-efficacy, and self-reports of F&V consumption. These were collected at baseline and during follow-up visits to the WIC clinic. A total of 433 participants completed pre-test data across the four sites. A number of individuals transferred from their original clinic or did not return to their clinic during the study (n = 62). Of the remaining 371 participants, a total of 225 participants returned at least two surveys, for a response rate of 60.6%. These were primarily native Spanish speaking, Hispanic women, of low educational level. Results were mixed. Although there was no significant increase in the cognitive constructs (self-efficacy, attitudes, etc.), participants in the intervention clinics reported a significant increase in stage of change and a composite measure of F&V in-take. In contrast, participants in the control clinics reported no change in these variables. Thus, there appears to be some utility in the use of the Walk Texas! Clinical Counseling Guide for Nutrition in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weisburger, J. H. (2000). Eat to live, not live to eat. Nutrition, 16, 767–773.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dauchet, L., Amouyel, P., Hercberg, S., & Dallongeville, J. (2006). Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Journal of Nutrition, 136, 2588–2593.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirsh, V. A. (2007). Prospective study of fruit and vegetable intake and risk of prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 99, 1200–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joshipura, K. J., Ascherio, A., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Rimm, E. B., Speizer, FE, et al. (1999). Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA, 282, 1233–1239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agudo, A., Cabrera, L., Amiano, P., Ardanaz, E., Barricarte, A., Berenguer, T., et al. (2007). Fruit and vegetable intakes, dietary antioxidant nutrients, and total mortality in Spanish adults: Findings from the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Spain). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85, 1634–1642.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, R., Serdula, M., Bland, S., Mokdad, A., Bowman, B., & Nelson, D. (2000). Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in 16 US states: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1990–1996. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 777–7781.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Subar, A. F. (1995). Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: The baseline survey of the Five A Day for Better Health Program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 352–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball, K., Crawford, D., & Mishra, G. (2006). Socio-economic inequalities in women’s fruit and vegetable intakes: A multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutrition, 9, 623–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowry, R., Kann, L., Collins, J. L., & Kolbe, L. J. (1996). The effect of socioeconomic status on chronic disease risk behaviors among US adolescents. JAMA, 276, 792–797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Havas, S., Anliker, J., Damron, D., Langenberg, P., Ballesteros, M., & Feldman, R. (1998). Final results of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day Promotion Program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1161–1167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Winkleby, M. A., Jatulis, D. E., Frank, E., & Fortmann, S. P. (1992). Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 816–820.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogers, R. P., Bemelmans, W. J., Hoogenveen, R. T., Boshuizen, H. C., Woodward, M., Knekt, P., et al. (2007). Association of overweight with increased risk of coronary heart disease partly independent of blood pressure and cholesterol levels: A meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies including more than 300,000 persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167, 1720–1728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trudeau, E., Kristal, A. R., Li, S., & Patterson, R. E. (1998). Demographic and psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes differ: Implications for dietary interventions. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 1412–1427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langenberg, P., Ballesteros, M., Feldman, R., Damron, D., Anliker, J., & Havas, S. (2000). Psychosocial factors and intervention-associated changes in those factors as correlates of change in fruit and vegetable consumption in the Maryland WIC 5 A Day Promotion Program. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 307–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Steptoe, A., Perkins-Porras, L., McKay, C., Rink, E., Hilton, S., & Cappuccio, F. P. (2003). Behavioural counselling to increase consumption of fruit and vegetables in low income adults: Randomised trial. BMJ, 326, 855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Treiman, K., Freimuth, V., Damron, D., Lasswell, A., Anliker, J., Havas, S., et al. (1996). Attitudes and behaviours to fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the WIC program. Journal of Nutrition Education, 28, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reicks, M., Randall, J. L., & Haynes, B. J. (1994). Factors affecting consumption of fruits and vegetables by low-income families. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 94, 1309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morton, J. F., & Guthrie, J. F. (1997). Diet-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of low income individuals with children in the household. Family Economics Nutrition Review, 10, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henry, H., Reimer, K., Smith, C., & Reicks, M. (2006). Associations of decisional balance, processes of change, and self-efficacy with stages of change for increased fruit and vegetable intake among low-income, African-American mothers. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106, 841–849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman, R. H., Damron, D., Anliker, J., Ballesteros, R. D., Langenberg, P., DiClemente, C., et al. (2000). The effect of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day promotion program on participants’ stages of change for fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Education and Behavior 27, 649–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell, M. K., Reynolds, K. D., Havas, S., Curry, S., Bishop, D., Nicklas, T., et al. (1999). Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among adults and young adults participating in the national 5-a-Day for Better Health community studies. Health Education and Behavior, 26, 513–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, B., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Taylor, G., McClelland, J. W., Stables, G., Havas, S., et al. (1999). Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 99, 1241–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Havas, S., Roccella, E. J., & Lenfant, C. (2004). Reducing the public health burden from elevated blood pressure levels in the United States by lowering intake of dietary sodium. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 19–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delichatsios, H. K., Hunt, M. K., Lobb, R., Emmons, K., & Gillman, M. W. (2001). Eat smart: efficacy of a multifaceted preventive nutrition intervention in clinical practice. Preventive Medicine, 33(2 Pt 1), 91–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Birmingham, B., Shultz, J. A., & Edlefsen, M. (2004). Evaluation of a Five-A-Day recipe booklet for enhancing the use of fruits and vegetables in low-income households. Journal of Community Health, 29, 45–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2003). Agricultural Fact Book, Office of Communications, 2000 National Research Council. Estimating eligibility and participation for the WIC program: Final report. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  27. Wahlsten, D. (1991). Sample Size to detect a planned contrast and a one degree of freedom interaction effect. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Katz, J. N., & Wright, J. G. (2001). A taxonomy for responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1204–1217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: Discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 157–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, D3700, Austin, TX, 78712-1204, USA

    John B. Bartholomew, Robin Atwood & Nell H. Gottlieb

  2. School of Applied Health and Educational Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 427 Willard, Stillwater, OK, 74074, USA

    Bridget M. Miller

  3. Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Brown Medical School and The Miriam Hospital, One Hoppin Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA

    Joseph T. Ciccolo

Authors
  1. John B. Bartholomew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bridget M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph T. Ciccolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robin Atwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nell H. Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John B. Bartholomew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartholomew, J.B., Miller, B.M., Ciccolo, J.T. et al. Walk Texas! 5-A-Day Intervention for Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) Clients: A Quasi-experimental Study. J Community Health 33, 297–303 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9103-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9103-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation