Skip to main content

Indigenous Gambling and Problem Gambling in Canada

Abstract

The present study provides a profile of Canadian Indigenous gambling and problem gambling using the 2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (n = 23,952 adults; 1,324 Indigenous) and an online panel survey of 10,199 gamblers (n = 589 Indigenous). The relative popularity of different types of gambling was similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous samples. However, there was higher Indigenous participation in electronic gambling machines (EGMs), bingo, instant lotteries, overall gambling and a higher rate of problem gambling (2.0% versus 0.5%). Variables predictive of Indigenous problem gambling were EGM participation, gambling fallacies, having a mental or substance use disorder, sports betting, and male gender. Compared to non-Indigenous problem gamblers, Indigenous problem gamblers had higher substance use and lower impulsivity. In general, variables predictive of Indigenous problem gambling were the same ones predictive of problem gambling in all populations, with elevated Indigenous problem gambling rates primarily being due to elevated rates of these generic risk factors. Many of these risk factors are modifiable. Particular consideration should be given to reducing the disproportionate concentration of EGMs in geographic areas having the highest concentration of Indigenous people and ameliorating the disadvantageous social conditions in this population that are conducive to mental health and substance use problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. As part of the ANP the Canadian prevalence rates of gambling and problem gambling in 2018 and how these rates have changed since 2002 have recently been reported by Williams et al., (2020) as have the predictors of problem gambling in Canada in 2018 (Williams et al., 2021).

  2. Statistics Canada has access to cell phone and landline numbers of most Canadians.

  3. The three Canadian territories of Nunavut, Northwest Territories, and Yukon represent only 0.32% of the Canadian population.

  4. In 2016, a total of 1,673,785 Canadians self-reported an Indigenous identity, representing 4.9% of the Canadian population, up from 2.8% in 1996 (Statistics Canada, 2017). Within this group, 58.4% identified as First Nations (76.2% with Treaty Indian status), 35.1% as Métis (mixed European and Indigenous ancestry), 3.9% as Inuit, and 2.7% reported being of mixed or other identity. There are approximately 630 First Nations bands in Canada and 70 different Indigenous languages (Statistics Canada, 2017). The majority of Indigenous people reside in Ontario (22.4%), the four western provinces of British Columbia (16.2%), Alberta (15.5%), Manitoba (13.3%), Saskatchewan (10.5%), and Quebec (10.9%). However, they only constitute the majority of the population in the territories of Nunavut (85.9%) and the Northwest Territories (50.2%). In 2011, 62.4% of First Nations people lived off First Nation reserves. [Note: Inuit and Métis normally do not live on First Nation reserves, although many reside in communities with self-government agreements].

  5. Research shows that a mildly restrictive frequency threshold of gambling once a month or more on any type of gambling appears optimal in excluding some false positives while not inadvertently excluding people with genuine gambling-related harm (Stone et al., 2015; Williams & Volberg, 2009, 2012).

  6. The traditional 8 + PGSI demarcation of problem gambling has good correspondence to clinically assessed people with gambling problems in treatment, but poor correspondence to clinically assessed people with gambling problems in the general population (Ferris & Wynne, 1999, p.39; Ladouceur et al., 2005; Williams & Volberg, 2014). One of the central reasons for this is because the PGSI was normed on a small group of treatment-seeking people with gambling problems who tend to have a more pervasive and severe set of problems compared to people with gambling-related problems in the general population, the large majority of whom have never sought treatment. Research shows that reducing this threshold to 5 + successfully captures most of the population-based problem gamblers (Williams & Volberg, 2014).

  7. There are minor operational differences between slot machines and VLTs in Canada. The main difference has to do with their location with slot machines being located in dedicated gambling venues (casinos, bingo halls, horserace tracks), whereas VLTs are distributed more widely outside of dedicated gambling venues, typically in age-restricted bars/lounges.

  8. Either in the form of slot machines in First Nation casinos (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick) and/or being a VLT site holder (Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia).

  9. These figures were derived primarily from the 2017/2018 annual report of each of the provincial gambling operators supplemented by 2018/2019 data from http://www.casinocity.com/ (Quebec slots), and email communication from the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (Aug 21, 2020), Manitoba Liquor & Lotteries (Aug 21, 2020), Murray Marshall, Kahnewa:ke Gaming Commission (Aug 25, 2020), and the Atlantic Lottery Corporation (Sep 14, 2020) regarding First Nation EGMs.

  10. This is with an obtained sample of 761 weighted to match the population. Nunavut was the only jurisdiction in Canada to administer a Gambling Module in the 2015 and 2016 CCHS. No province or territory administered a Gambling Module in 2017.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publishing

  • Belanger, Y. D. (2006). Gambling with the future: The evolution of aboriginal gaming in Canada. Purich.

  • Belanger, Y. D. (2011a). Toward an innovative understanding of North American indigenous gaming in historical perspective. In Y. D. Belanger (Ed.), First Nations gaming in Canada (pp. 10–34). Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, Y. D. (2011b). First nations gaming in Canada. University of Manitoba Press.

  • Belanger, Y. D., Williams, R. J., & Prusak, S. Y. (2017). Tracking the Westernization of urban Aboriginal gambling in Canada’s Prairie Provinces. International Gambling Studies, 17(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P. (2005). Gambling across cultures: Mapping worldwide occurrence and learning from ethnographic comparison. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790500097913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2017). Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: Evidence from a Swedish population survey. International Gambling Studies, 17(3), 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, H., & Gainsbury, S. (2013). Aboriginal gambling and problem gambling: A review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggen, E., van den Brakel, J. A., & Krosnick, J. (2016). Establishing the accuracy of online panels for survey research. Statistics Netherlands.

  • Carrière, G., Bougie, E., & Kohen, D. (2018). Acute care hospitalizations for mental and behavioural disorders among First Nations people. Health Reports, 29(6), 11–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. R., Williams, R. J., & Ofori-Dei, S. M. (2019). The multidimensional structure of problem gambling: An evaluation of four gambling categorization instruments from an international online survey of gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(4), 1079–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Yu, N., Afifi, T. O., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(4), 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culin, S. (1907). Games of the North American Indians. Dover.

  • Curtis, LJ (2007) Health status of on and off-reserve Aboriginal peoples: Analysis of the Aboriginal Peoples Survey (No 191). McMaster University.

  • Dixon, M., & Moore, K. (2006). Native American gambling: The quest for the new white buffalo. In Gambling: Behavior Theory, Research and Application. Edited by Dixon, M., Ghezzi, P., Lyons, C., Wilson G. Context Press. pp. 231–247

  • Ferris J,. & Wynne H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Ottawa.

  • Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2012). Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: A review. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodie, A. S., & Fortune, E. E. (2013). Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: Review and meta-analyses. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2014). Indigenous Australians and gambling. Australian Gambling Research Centre.

  • Hing, N., Breen, H., Gordon, A., & Russell, A. (2014). Gambling harms and gambling help-seeking amongst Indigenous Australians. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(3), 737–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. G. (2005). Socioeconomic status and mental illness: tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., & Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), e356–e366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Batty, G. D., Pentti, J., Shipley, M. J., Sipilä, P. N., Nyberg, S. T., & Marmot, M. G. (2020). Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: A multi-cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 5(3), e140–e149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(8), 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-K., Back, K.-J., Williams, R. J., & Ahn, S.-S. (2015). Comparison of telephone RDD and online panel survey modes on CPGI scores and comorbidities. International Gambling Studies, 15(3), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C. A., & Williams, R. J. (2016). The relationship between gambling fallacies and problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(6), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C. A., Williams, R. J., & McGrath, D. S. (2021). Gambling fallacies: predicting problem gambling in a nationally representative sample. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, C. A., Williams, R. J., & Vokey, J. (2015). Gambling fallacies: What are they and how are they best measured? Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 6(4), 256. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaren, V. V. (2016). Video lottery is the most harmful form of gambling in Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(2), 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. (2019). First Nations gaming in Canada: Navigating the labyrinth. Gaming Law Review, 23(8), 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, R., Graves, C., Ellery, M., & Afifi, T. O. (2016). The temporal relationship between faulty gambling cognitions and gambling severity in young adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(4), 1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9605-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raisamo, S., Toikka, A., Selin, J., & Heiskanen, M. (2019). The density of electronic gambling machines and area-level socioeconomic status in Finland: a country with a legal monopoly on gambling and a decentralised system of EGMs. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rintoul, A. C., Livingstone, C., Mellor, A. P., & Jolley, D. (2013). Modelling vulnerability to gambling related harm: How disadvantage predicts gambling losses. Addiction Research & Theory, 21(4), 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. A. (1974). An analysis of the role of games in the fertility rituals of the native North American. Anthropos, 69, 494–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M.A (1980). Play in ritual: An ethnohistorical overview of native North America. In: HB Schwartzman (Ed), Play and culture: 1978 proceedings of the Association for the Anthropological Study of Play. West Point, NY: Leisure Press. pp. 70–82.

  • Schaap, J. I. (2010). The growth of the native American gaming industry: What has the past provided, and what does the future hold? The American Indian Quarterly, 34(3), 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, S., Butler, K., & Roberts, A. (2019). Psychosocial risk factors in disordered gambling: A descriptive systematic overview of vulnerable populations. Addictive Behaviors, 99, 106071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). Statistics Canada.

  • Statistics Canada. (2016a). Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). Statistics Canada.

  • Statistics Canada (2016b). Aboriginal Peoples Highlight Tables, 2016 Census https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/hlt-fst/abo-aut/Table.cfm?Lang=Eng&S=99&O=A&RPP=25

  • Statistics Canada (2019c). Canadian Internet Use Survey. The Daily https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/191029/dq191029a-eng.htm

  • Statistics Canada (2017). Aboriginal people in Canada: Key results from the 2016 Census. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/daily-quotidien/171025/dq171025a-eng.pdf?st=124d_Uf8

  • Statistics Canada. (2019a). Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) annual component user guide. Statistics Canada.

  • Statistics Canada. (2019b). Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) rapid response on gambling. Complement to the user guide. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., & Young, M. (2009). Betting on the evidence: Reported gambling problems among the Indigenous population of the Northern Territory. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33(6), 556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. A., Romild, U., Abbott, M., Yeung, K., Billi, R., & Volberg, R. (2015). Effects of different screening and scoring thresholds on PGSI gambling risk segments. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(1), 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? a meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuchinich, R. E., Tucker, J. A., & Harllee, L. M. (1986, August). Individual differences in the reliability of alcoholics’ reports of drinking. In: Poster presented at the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Wardle, H., Keily, R., Astbury, G., & Reith, G. (2014). ‘Risky places?’: Mapping gambling machine density and socio-economic deprivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(1), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardman, D., & el-GuebalyHodgins, N. D. (2001). Problem and pathological gambling in North American Aboriginal populations: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(2), 81–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2017). Predictors of problem gambling in the US. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitesell, N. R., Beals, J., Crow, C. B., Mitchell, C. M., & Novins, D. K. (2012). Epidemiology and etiology of substance use among American Indians and Alaska Natives: Risk, protection, and implications for prevention. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38(5), 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Belanger, Y. D., & Prusak, S. Y. (2016). Gambling and problem gambling among Canadian Urban Aboriginals. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(11), 724–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J., Leonard, C.A., Belanger, Y.D., Christensen, D.R., el-Guebaly, N., Hodgins, D.C., McGrath, D.S., Nicholl, F., Smith, G., & Stevens, R.M.G (2021). Predictors of gambling and problem gambling in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00443-x

  • Williams, R.J., Leonard, C.A., Belanger, Y.D., Christensen, D.R., el-Guebaly, N., Hodgins, D.C., McGrath, D.S., Nicholl, F., Stevens, R.M.G. (2020). Gambling and Problem Gambling in Canada: Prevalence and Changes since 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 0706743720980080

  • Williams, R. J., Stevens, R., & Nixon, G. (2011). Gambling and problem gambling in North American Aboriginal People. In Y. D. Belanger (Ed.), First Nations Gaming in Canada (pp. 166–194). University of Manitoba Press.

  • Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2009). Impact of survey description, administration format, and exclusionary criteria on population prevalence rates of problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J., & Volberg, R.A. (2012). Population assessment of problem gambling: Utility and best practices. Report for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. April 30, 2012 [accessed 2020 May 17] https://hdl.handle.net/10133/3094.

  • Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2014). The classification accuracy of four problem gambling assessment instruments in population research. International Gambling Studies, 14(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J., Volberg, R.A, Stevens, R.M.G., Williams, L.A. & Arthur, J.N. (2017). The Definition, Dimensionalization, and Assessment of Gambling Participation. Report for the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research. February 2, 2017. https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/handle/10133/4838

  • Williams, R.J., West, B.L, & Simpson, R.I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence, and identified best practices. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. October 1, 2012. [accessed 2020 May 17] https://hdl.handle.net/10133/3121

  • Young, M., Barnes, T., Stevens, M., Paterson, M., & Morris, M. (2007). The changing landscape of Indigenous gambling in Northern Australia: Current knowledge and future directions. International Gambling Studies, 7(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowski, S. (2018). The world count of gaming machines 2018. Gaming Technologies Association. https://gamingta.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/World+Count+of+Gaming+Machines+2018.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research (CCGR) for funding the development and inclusion of the Gambling Module in the CCHS. Special thanks also go to Dr. Seamus O’Shea, Alberta Gambling Research Institute (AGRI) Board Chair, and Glenda Wong, AGRI Executive Director, for their foresight in helping to formulate and develop the AGRI National Project and in facilitating its successful implementation. The present study is part of a comprehensive national study of gambling jointly funded by the CCGR, the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO), and AGRI. Details can be contained on our website: https://www.ucalgary.ca/research/national-gambling-study/. As mentioned, the Gambling Module was specifically funded by CCGR. GREO exclusively contributed to the funding of the Project Manager to clean ANP data for eventual housing with GREO to facilitate public access for other researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was received from the University of Lethbridge Human Subjects.Review Committee (ID#: 2018–063).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, R.J., Belanger, Y.D., Leonard, C.A. et al. Indigenous Gambling and Problem Gambling in Canada. J Gambl Stud 38, 67–85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10022-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10022-5

Keywords

  • Gambling
  • Problem gambling
  • Indigenous
  • Canada