A Cross-Cultural Study of Weekly Sports Bettors in Australia and Spain

Abstract

Betting on sport is one of the fastest developing forms of gambling internationally. Sports betting is attracting considerable scholarly, media, and regulatory attention due to the cultural salience of sport, and the rising public health concerns about the rapid proliferation and penetration of betting products in everyday life. Despite its global expansion, little is known regarding the comparative impact sports betting is having in different territories. This study aims to examine a sample of Australian (n = 738) and Spanish (n = 361) weekly sports bettors to assess their similarities and differences concerning sociodemographic characteristics, channels (i.e., online vs. offline) and devices used, in-play betting, and problem gambling severity. The findings showed high problem gambling scores among sports bettors in both countries, and consistent similarities in the association between problem gambling, in-play betting, and offline betting. Also, clear trends were observed between problem gambling, higher educational level, and female sport betting, particularly in the Australian sample. These results suggest a common pattern of risk factors for problematic sports betting and can help to inform worldwide regulatory efforts to tackle harmful sports betting-specific features such as in-play betting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2010). Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada. Psychiatry Research,178(2), 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, A., & Carroll, M. (2017a). Gambling activity in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, A., & Carroll, M. (2017b). Sports betting in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Gambling Research Centre, Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Australian Commonwealth Parliament. Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (2001). Australia.

  5. Bakken, I. J., Götestam, K. G., Gråwe, R. W., Wenzel, H. G., & Øren, A. (2009). Gambling behavior and gambling problems in Norway 2007. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,50(4), 333–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnaire, C., Kovess-Masfety, V., Guignard, R., Richard, J. B., du Roscoät, E., & Beck, F. (2017). Gambling type, substance abuse, health and psychosocial correlates of male and female problem gamblers in a nationally representative French sample. Journal of Gambling Studies,33(2), 343–369.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowden-Jones, H., & Prever, F. (2017). Gambling disorders in women: An international female perspective on treatment and research. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braverman, J., Laplante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2013). Using cross-game behavioral markers for early identification of high-risk internet gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,27(3), 868–877.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deans, E. G., Thomas, S. L., Daube, M., Derevensky, J., & Gordon, R. (2016). Creating symbolic cultures of consumption: An analysis of the content of sports wagering advertisements in Australia. BMC Public Health,16(1), 208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Social Services. (2018). National consumer protection framework for online wagering. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_2018/ncpfow-fact-sheet28-nov-2018-2.pdf.

  11. Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2016). Estudio sobre prevalencia, comportamiento y características de los usuarios de juegos de azar en España 2015. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2017a). Datos del mercado de juego online. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego. (2017b). Gasto promocional de juego online. Madrid: Spanish Ministry for Finance and Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Estévez, A., Rodríguez, R., Díaz, N., Granero, R., Mestre-Bach, G., Steward, T., et al. (2017). How do online sports gambling disorder patients compare with land-based patients? Journal of Behavioral Addictions,6(4), 639–647.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. European Gaming & Betting Association. (2018). Most popular gambling activities. Brussels: European Gaming & Betting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gainsbury, S. M., & Russell, A. (2015). Betting patterns for sports and races: A longitudinal analysis of online wagering in Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies,31(1), 17–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Blaszczynski, A., & Hing, N. (2015a). Greater involvement and diversity of Internet gambling as a risk factor for problem gambling. European Journal of Public Health,25(4), 723–728.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Blaszczynski, A., & Hing, N. (2015b). The interaction between gambling activities and modes of access: A comparison of Internet-only, land-based only, and mixed-mode gamblers. Addictive Behaviors,41, 34–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,28(3), 769–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gambling Commission. (2016). In-play (in-running) betting: Position paper. London. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/In-running-betting-position-paper.pdf.

  22. Gambling Commission. (2018). Gambling Commission to crackdown on operators who don’t treat consumers fairly. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/news/2018/Crackdown-on-operators-who-dont-treat-consumers-fairly.aspx.

  23. Gassmann, F., Emrich, E., & Pierdzioch, C. (2017). Who bets on sports? Some further empirical evidence using German data. International Review for the Sociology of Sport,52(4), 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gebauer, L., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: A brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,55(2), 82–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gordon, R., Gurrieri, L., & Chapman, M. (2015). Broadening an understanding of problem gambling: The lifestyle consumption community of sports betting. Journal of Business Research,68(10), 2164–2172.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hing, N., Gainsbury, S., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Russell, A. (2014a). Interactive gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., & Browne, M. (2017). Risk factors for gambling problems on online electronic gaming machines, race betting and sports betting. Frontiers in Psychology,15(8), 775.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., Gainsbury, S. M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2015). Characteristics and help-seeking behaviors of Internet gamblers based on most problematic mode of gambling. Journal of Medical Internet Research,17(1), E13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., Vitartas, P., & Lamont, M. (2016). Demographic, behavioural and normative risk factors for gambling problems amongst sports bettors. Journal of Gambling Studies,32(2), 625–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hing, N., Vitartas, P., Lamont, M., & Fink, E. (2014b). Adolescent exposure to gambling promotions during televised sport: An exploratory study of links with gambling intentions. International Gambling Studies,14(3), 374–393.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, J. H., & Boyer, R. (2007). Epidemiology of youth gambling problems in Canada: A national prevalence study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,52(10), 657–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hubert, P., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). A comparison of online versus offline gambling harm in Portuguese pathological gamblers: An empirical study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,16(5), 1219–1237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Killick, E. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). In-play sports betting: A scoping study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9896-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Identifying behavioral markers of disordered Internet sports gambling. Addiction Research & Theory,19(1), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lamont, M., Hing, N., & Vitartas, P. (2016). Affective response to gambling promotions during televised sport: A qualitative analysis. Sport Management Review,19(3), 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  36. LaPlante, D., Nelson, S. E., & Gray, H. M. (2014). Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding Internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,28(2), 396–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li, E., Langham, E., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Thorne, H. (2018). Gambling and sport: Implicit association and explicit intention among underage youth. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9756-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Estévez, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Marketing and advertising online sports betting: A problem gambling perspective. Journal of Sport & Social Issues,41(3), 256–272.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Estévez, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018a). Internet-based structural characteristics of sports betting and problem gambling severity: Is there a relationship? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9876-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Estévez, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018b). Spanish validation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index: A confirmatory factor analysis with sports bettors. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,7(3), 814–820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Griffiths, M. D., & Estévez, A. (2018c). In-play betting, sport broadcasts, and gambling severity: A survey study of Spanish sports bettors on the risks of betting on sport while watching it. Communication & Sport. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479518816338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). A scoping study of the structural and situational characteristics of internet gambling. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning,3(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Merkouris, S. S., Thomas, A. C., Shandley, K. A., Rodda, S. N., Oldenhof, E., & Dowling, N. A. (2016). An update on gender differences in the characteristics associated with problem gambling: A systematic review. Current Addiction Reports,3(3), 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Milner, L., Hing, N., Vitartas, P., & Lamont, M. (2013). An exploratory study of embedded gambling promotion in Australian football television broadcasts. Communication, Politics and Culture,46, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Myrseth, H., Pallesen, S., Molde, H., Johnsen, B. H., & Lorvik, I. M. (2009). Personality factors as predictors of pathological gambling. Personality and Individual Differences,47(8), 933–937.

    Google Scholar 

  46. National Opinion Research Center. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2006). The proxy effect: Gender and gambling problem trajectories of iowa gambling treatment program participants. Journal of Gambling Studies,22(2), 221–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2018). Youth unemployment rate. Paris. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://data.oecd.org/unemp/youth-unemployment-rate.htm.

  49. Papineau, E., Lacroix, G., Sévigny, S., Biron, J. F., Corneau-Tremblay, N., & Lemétayer, F. (2018). Assessing the differential impacts of online, mixed, and offline gambling. International Gambling Studies,18(1), 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 211–243). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Philander, K. S., & MacKay, T.-L. (2014). Online gambling participation and problem gambling severity: Is there a causal relationship? International Gambling Studies,14(2), 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pitt, H., Thomas, S., Bestman, A., Stoneham, M., & Daube, M. (2016). “It’s just everywhere!” Children and parents discuss the marketing of sports betting in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,40(5), 480–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Queensland Government Statistician’s Office. (2018). Australian Gambling Statistics (34th ed.). Queensland: Queensland Government Statistician’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Reiche, D. (2013). The prohibition of online sports betting: A comparative analysis of Germany and the United States. European Sport Management Quarterly,13(3), 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Russell, A. M. T., Hing, N., Browne, M., Li, E., & Vitartas, P. (2018a). Who bets on micro events (microbets) in sports? Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9810-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Russell, A. M. T., Hing, N., Li, E., & Vitartas, P. (2018b). Gambling risk groups are not all the same: Risk factors amongst sports bettors. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9765-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Scalese, M., Bastiani, L., Salvadori, S., Gori, M., Lewis, I., Jarre, P., et al. (2016). Association of problem gambling with type of gambling among Italian general population. Journal of Gambling Studies,32(3), 1017–1026.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stradbrooke, S. (2018). Italy gambling advertising ban targets January 1, 2019 start. Retrieved December 19, 2018, from: https://calvinayre.com/2018/06/27/business/italy-advertising-ban-january-2019/.

  59. Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. E. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,104, 250–256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wardle, H. (2017). The re-feminisation of gambling. In H. Bowden-Jones & F. Prever (Eds.), Gambling disorders in women: An international female perspective on treatment and research (pp. 173–186). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors,29(2), 323–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ottawa: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wood, J., Howman, D., & Murrihy, R. (2018). Report of the review of Australia’s sports integrity arrangements. Canberra: Department of Health, Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez has been supported by the Government of the Basque Country, Spain, under grant reference (Eusko Jaurlaritza, POS_2015_1_0062). He and Ana Estévez have been additionally funded by the Spanish Organization of the Blind (ONCE, III International Award). Alex Russell has received funding from Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation; Queensland Justice and Attorney-General; Gambling Research Australia; National Association for Gambling Studies; Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. He has received industry funding for an evaluation of problem gambling amongst casino employees from Echo/Star Entertainment Group. He is also affiliated with the University of Sydney. Nerilee Hing has received research funds from the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, Gambling Research Australia, Australian Government Department of Social Services, Alberta Gambling Research Institute, the Australian Gambling Research Centre, the Queensland, New South Wales, Victorian and South Australian Governments, the Australian Research Council, and Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. She has also received consultancy funds from Echo Entertainment and Sportsbet and an honorarium from Singapore Pools for membership of its International Advisory Committee. Mark Griffiths declares that he has received funding for a number of research projects in the area of gambling education for young people, social responsibility in gambling and gambling treatment from the Responsibility in Gambling Trust, a charitable body which funds its research program based on donations from the gambling industry. He also undertakes consultancy for various gaming companies in the area of social responsibility in gambling.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Both studies had obtained approval by the respective research ethics committee of their universities in their countries. The Australian study was approved by Southern Cross University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval ECN-16-201), and reciprocal approval was granted by CQUniversity Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval H16/06-163). The Spanish study was approved (Reference: ETK-13/15-16) in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In both cohorts, participants were compensated for their time following each panel’s protocols. Participants were reassured of their right to withdraw from the respective studies at any time, the confidentiality of their data, and provided informed consent to participate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez-Gonzalez, H., Russell, A.M.T., Hing, N. et al. A Cross-Cultural Study of Weekly Sports Bettors in Australia and Spain. J Gambl Stud 36, 937–955 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09898-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Problem gambling
  • Sports betting
  • In-play betting
  • Online gambling
  • Australian gambling
  • Spanish gambling