Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Betting Practices Among Players in Portuguese Championships: From Cultural to Illegal Behaviours

  • 100 Accesses

  • 1 Citations


The growth of the online sports betting market has generated new risk areas and threats to sport integrity, such as match-fixing. In recent years, institutional concern to fight against the phenomenon has been intensified and a set of countermeasures has been adopted. One of the most widely implemented measures to protect integrity in sport is to ban athletes and sports players from betting on the competitions in which they are involved. In some countries, such as Portugal, this practice has become a crime under the new legislation. Despite the legal and sporting restrictions and the prevention programmes carried out for sport institutions to explain the gambling rules, there are many athletes who are putting bets on their own competitions and even in their own games. Through interviews with key informant actors and ethnographic fieldwork, this article describes betting patterns among sports actors in Portugal and explains the perceptions and incentives that lead them to bet in their own sports, competitions and games. The results show different conceptions of integrity between the normative discourse on legal and sport governance institutions and sports actors’ opinion, essentially, the premise that suggest a direct link between betting on one’s own games and manipulation of these games. In some cases, betting in one’s own games helps to strengthen fair play values. However, the spreading of online betting, together with the perception of inefficient controls in the implementation of sporting and legal regulations, creates opportunity structures for fixing matches and taking financial profit though gambling activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Betting-motivated corruption includes three practices linked to the intentional manipulation of competitions, results or aspects of a match (Boniface et al. 2012): (1) match-fixing (manipulation of the outcome of a match to support a bet), (2) spot-fixing (staging a certain aspect of a sporting contest to support a bet), and (3) the misuse of insider information (intentional misuse of insider information to gain advantage in the betting market). For further explanations see Gorse and Chadwick (2011), Anderson (2014), Lastra et al. (2018).

  2. 2.

    See art. 4 do Decreto Lei N.º 66/2015 e do Decreto Lei N.º 67/2015.

  3. 3.

    These issues have been verified with evidence collected in two previous projects funded by the European Commission through its programme Erasmus + Sport: Anti Match-Fixing Top Training (AMATT, 2017-2019) and Training for Protected Reporting System in Professional and Grassroots Sport (T-PREG, 2018-2020).

  4. 4.

    See for instance: SportAccord eLearning (; Fix the Fixing educational tools (; IOC Integrity eLearning platform (; INTERPOL eLearning program ( For a critical analysis of the hegemonic anti-match-fixing narrative, see Moriconi (2018).

  5. 5.

    Law 73/2014.

  6. 6.

    Portugal was 1 of the first 3 countries in ratified the Council of Europe Convention. For more information, see Moriconi and Almeida (2019a, b).

  7. 7.

    Information offer by the Integrity Department of the Olympic Committee of Portugal.

  8. 8.

    Information gathered through non-participant and participant intervention in COP’s integrity training developed in 2017 and 2018.

  9. 9.

    “Barton Claims 50% Of Footballers Are Betting on Matches”, Sabotage Times, 2018,

  10. 10.

    Official sport bets of the National Lottery.

  11. 11.

    Jake Lambourne, “Barton´s Ban Reduced”, The Sun, 2017,

  12. 12.

    In Portugal, this practice is called the suitcase game (o jogo da mala). Club X offers a financial incentive to Club A if it beat or draw Club B, who is, in fact, the direct competition of Club X (for the championship, title, promotion and/or relegation).

  13. 13.

    “Michael Chopra reveals football’s gambling problem”, Independent, 2013,

  14. 14.

  15. 15.

    Despite all institutional sectors interviewees agreeing that Portugal have one of the best legal frameworks for fighting against corruption (Moriconi and Almeida 2019a), many empathize the lack of means to effectively put it in practice. The district attorney general of Lisbon, Amadeu Guerra, has publicly warned that there is a lack of magistrates and technological resources to investigate (Lusa 2019).


  1. Anderson, J. (2014). Match fixing and money laundering. In Annual socio-legal studies association conference. Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, 9–11 April 2014. (Queen’s University Belfast Law Research Paper No. 2014-05). Accessed October 8, 2017.

  2. Aquilina, D., & Chetcuti, A. (2014). Match-fixing: The case of Malta. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics,6(1), 107–128.

  3. ATP Tour. (2019). The 2019 ATP Office Rulebook. USA: ATP.

  4. Bagchi, R. (2011). Dominic Matteo: ‘I was gambling away my daughter's inheritance’. In The guardian. Accessed 8 May 2019.

  5. Bahn, S., & Weatherill, P. (2013). Qualitative social research: A risky business when it comes to collecting ‘sensitive’ data. Qualitative Research,13(1), 19–35.

  6. Bleich, E., & Pekkanen, R. (2013). How to report interview data. Interview Research in Political Science,1, 84–105.

  7. Boniface, P., Lacarrière, S., & Verschuuren, P. (2012). Paris sportifs et corruption: Comment préserver l’intégrité du sport. Paris: Colin.

  8. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.

  9. Carpenter, K. (2012). Match-fixing: The biggest threat to sport in the 21st century? Internacional Sports Law Review,2, 13–23.

  10. Chappelet, J.-L. (2015). The Olympic fight against match-fixing. Sport in Society,18(10), 1260–1272.

  11. Council of Europe. (2014). Council of Europe convention on the manipulation of sports competitions. Accessed October 10, 2017.

  12. Da Coasta, A. F. (1986). A pesquisa de terreno em Sociologia. In A. S. Silva & J. M. Pinto (Eds.), Metodologia das Ciências Sociais. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.

  13. Denzin, N. K. (1970). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. Introduction. Sociological Methods, pp. 471–475.

  14. EUROPOL. (2017). Serious and organized crime threat assessment (SOCTA). Brussels: European Union. Accessed October 28, 2017.

  15. FIFPro. (2012). Black Book Eastern Europe. SPINS Slovenia: FIFPro. Accessed August 7, 2017.

  16. Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2003). Sport and gambling. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 598–611.

  17. Gokhale, N. (2009). Fixing the fixers: The justification of criminal liability for match-fixing. NUJS Law Review,2, 319.

  18. Gorse, S., & Chadwick, S. (2011). The prevalence of corruption in international sport. Report Gambling Association.

  19. Haberfeld, M. R., & Sheehan, D. (Eds.). (2013). Match-fixing in international sports: Existing processes, law enforcement, and prevention strategies. Berlin: Springer.

  20. Haghette, T. M. (1990). Metodologias qualitativas na sociologia. Petrópolis: Vozes.

  21. Hill, D. (2008). The fix: Soccer and organized crime. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Limited.

  22. Hill, D. (2009). How gambling corruptors fix football matches. European Sport Management Quarterly,9(4), 411–432.

  23. Hill, D. (2010). A critical mass of corruption: Why some football leagues have more match-fixing than others. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship,11(3), 38–52.

  24. Hill, D. (2015). Jumping into fixing. Trends in Organized Crime,18(3), 212–228.

  25. Interpol & IOC. (2015). Handbook on protecting sport from competition manipulation. Lausanne: IOC.

  26. IOC & UNDOC. (2013). Criminalization approach to combat match-fixing and illegal/irregular betting: A global perspective. Lausanne/Vienna: IOC-UNDOC.

  27. IOC eLearning. (2017). Accessed 8 May 2019.

  28. Lastra, R., Bell, P., & Bond, C. (2018). Sports betting and the integrity of Australian sport: Athletes’ and non-athletes’ perceptions of betting-motivated corruption in sport. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 52, 185–198.

  29. Lim, M. S. M., Bowden-Jones, H., Salinas, M., Price, J., Goodwin, G. M, Geddes, J., & Rogers, R. D. (2017). The experience of gambling problems in British professional footballers: A preliminary qualitative study. Addiction Research & Theory,25(2), 129–138.

  30. Lusa. (2019). Procurador Amadeu Guerra sugere alterações ao direito premial. In Diario de Noticias on line, June 6th, 2019. Accessed June 17, 2019.

  31. Lyhne, S. N., Ivarsson, A., Fallby, J., & Elbe, A. M. (2018). Gambling behaviours among Danish and Swedish elite football players. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 13(1), 1–14.

  32. Moriconi, M. (2011). ¿Ilegalidad justificada? clientelismo controlado en la administración chilena. Perfiles latinoamericanos,19(38), 227–247.

  33. Moriconi, M. (2013). Ser violento: los orígenes de la inseguridad y la víctima-cómplice. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.

  34. Moriconi, M. (2018). The official football match-fixing prevention discourse as a cognitive limitation (the cases of Iberian countries). Soccer & Society,19(2), 271–287.

  35. Moriconi, M., & Almeida, J. P. (2019a). Portuguese fight against match-fixing: Which policies and what ethic? Journal of Global Sport Management,4(1), 79–96.

  36. Moriconi, M., & Almeida, J. P. (2019b). New opportunities for criminal networks: How digital thechnologies are transforming betting industry. In F. D’Andrea & V. Baldi (Eds.), Codice e luoghi (pp. 203–223). Italy: Meltemi.

  37. Moriconi, M., & Teixeira-Diniz, R. (2016). Mitos, percepciones y actitudes frente a los resultados combinados en Portugal: un estudio con énfasis en los árbitros y los hinchas. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,82, 145–164.

  38. Numerato, D. (2016). Corruption and public secrecy: An ethnography of football match-fixing. Current Sociology,64(5), 699–717.

  39. Olympic Committee of Portugal. (2016). Codigo de Conduta sobre a Intergidade nas Apostas Desportivas. Lisboa: COP. Accessed 5 May 2019.

  40. Ramirez, J. L. (2002). La libertad: ¿un engaño conceptual? Foro Interno,2, 15–44.

  41. Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Institutionalism. In C. Hay, M. Lister & D. Marsh (Eds.), The state: Theories and issues (pp. 98–117). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  42. Şeker, F. S., & Şahin, M. (2018). The communal effects of bet match-fixing in football. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(11). Accessed 8 May 2019.

  43. Spapens, T., & Olfers, M. (2015). Match-fixing: The current discussion in Europe and the case of the Netherlands. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice,23(4), 333–358.

  44. Stillman, M. A., Brown, T., Ritvo, E. C., & Glick, I. D. (2016). Sport psychiatry and psychotherapeutic intervention, circa 2016. International Review of Psychiatry,28, 614–622.

  45. Tak, M. (2018). Too big to jail: Match-fixing, institutional failure and the shifting of responsibility. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(7), 788–806.

  46. Tak, M., Sam, M. P., & Jackson, S. J. (2018). The politics of countermeasures against match-fixing in sport: A political sociology approach to policy instruments. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(1), 30–48.

  47. Tolich, M. (2004). Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants. Qualitative Sociology,27(1), 101–106.

  48. UNODC-ICSS. (2016). Resource guide on good practices in the investigation of match-fixing. New York: United Nations.

  49. UNODC-IOC. (2016). Model criminal law provisions for the prosecution of competition manipulation. New York: United Nations.

  50. Woods, P. (1987). La escuela por dentro: la etnografia en la investigación educativa. Barcelona: Paidós.

Download references


Authors would like to thank the European Association of Studies of Gambling (EASG) for awarded César de Cima a Gambling Research Fund for PhD candidates that allow his research for this work and for the important inputs of some of its member during international workshops. This publication was also supported with funding from the strategic programme of the Centro de Estudos Internacionais ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (with the reference UID/CPO/03122/2019). Preliminary research was developed in the framework of the international project Training for Protected Reporting System (T-PREG), funded by European Commission Programme Erasmus + Sport (590593-EPP-1-2017-1-PT-SPO-SCP). The authors thanks all the informants that were interviewed. Their insight information was crucial for this research. They also want to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on early drafts of this paper. At different stages, Steve Guilbault helped with the English language revising and editing. The contents of this article reflect only the view of the authors.


European Association of Studies of Gambling (EASG) awarded a Gambling Research Fund for PhD candidates to César de Cima.

Author information

Correspondence to Marcelo Moriconi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Ethical standards

Authors have conducted their research in accordance with principles detailed by professional associations and treaties other than the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki such as the International Sociological Association’s (ISA) Code of Ethics.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moriconi, M., de Cima, C. Betting Practices Among Players in Portuguese Championships: From Cultural to Illegal Behaviours. J Gambl Stud 36, 161–181 (2020).

Download citation


  • Match-fixing
  • Crime
  • Sport betting
  • Portugal
  • Gambling
  • Cultural practices