Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Problem Gambling in a General Population Sample
This study examined the impact of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) on two measures of problem gambling. Using 112 general population adult participants, two measures of r-RST, the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ) and Jackson 5, were used to predict problem gambling operationalised using the South Oaks Gambling Screen and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Hypotheses were that the behavioural approach system (BAS) would positively predict problem gambling and the behavioural inhibition system (BIS) would negatively predict problem gambling. Results found that the BIS negatively predicted problem gambling. The RST-PQ BAS reward reactivity subscale positively predicted problem gambling using the IGT. These findings add to the operational understanding of the r-RST personality model, its relationships to avoidance and approach behaviour in response to reward and punishment, and to understanding the aetiology of problem gambling.
KeywordsReinforcement sensitivity theory Reward sensitivity Punishment sensitivity Gambling Iowa Gambling Task Southern Oaks Gambling Screen
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Author A declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Abdin, E., Subramaniam, M., Vaingankar, J. A., & Chong, S. (2012). Reliability and validity of the English version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a multiracial Asian community sample in Singapore. International Gambling Studies, 12, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.669777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen, P., Bennett, K., & Heritage, B. (2014). SPSS statistics version 22: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning South Melbourne, Australia Pty Ltd. Retrieved April 6, 2019 from https://cengage.com.au/product/title/spss-statistics-version-22-a-practical-guide/isbn/9780170348973.
- Ciccarelli, M., Griffiths, M., Nigro, G., & Cosenza, M. (2017). Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: A comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Collins, M. D., Jackson, C. J., Walker, B. R., O’Connor, P. J., & Gardiner, E. (2017). Integrating the context-appropriate balanced attention model and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Towards a domain-general personality process model. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Costumero, V., Barros-Loscertales, A., Fuentes, P., Rosell-Negre, P., Bustamante, J. C., & Avila, C. (2016). BAS-drive trait modulates dorsomedial striatum activity during reward response-outcome associations. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10, 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9466-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the funtions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved April 6, 2019 from http://stoa.usp.br/vahs/files/-1/16169/Gray+e+McNaughton+-+Neuropsychology+of+Anxiety.pdf.
- Jiminez-Murcia, S., Fernandez-Aranda, F., Mestre-Bach, G., Granero, R., Tarrega, S., Torrubia, R., et al. (2017). Exploring the relationship between reward and punishment sensitivity and gambling disorder in a clinical sample: A path modeling analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9631-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keough, M. T., Wardell, J. D., Hendershot, C. S., Bagby, R. M., & Quilty, L. C. (2017). Fun seeking and reward responsiveness moderate the effect of the behavioural inhibition system on coping-motivated problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9646-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krupic, D., Corr, P. J., Rucevic, S., Krizanic, V., & Gracanin, A. (2016a). Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lakey, C. E., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2007). Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: The utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for predicting pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9034-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smillie, L. D., Jackson, C. J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics: Pearson new international (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Torrubia, R., Avila, C., Molto, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verdejo-Garcia, A., Benbrook, A., Funderburk, F., David, P., Cadet, J. L., & Bolla, K. I. (2007). The differential relationship between cocaine use and marijuana use on decision-making performance over repeat testing with the Iowa Gambling Task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wardell, J. D., Quilty, L. C., Hendershot, C. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Motivational pathways from reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity to gambling frequency and gambling-related problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved April 6, 2019 from http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/life-sciences/animal-behaviour/behavioral-expressions-and-biosocial-bases-sensation-seeking?format=PB&isbn=9780521437707.