Effects of Gambling Diagnostic Criteria Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 on Mental Disorder Comorbidity Across Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample
Changes in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) criteria for a gambling disorder from DSM-IV to DSM-5 included a drop in the minimum number of criteria required to qualify for a diagnosis. This threshold reduction resulted in a near doubling of prevalence in non-gambling focused populations. However, the impact of this change on psychiatric comorbidity with gambling is unknown. The current study aimed to: (a) examine whether the diagnostic change affected the severity of those diagnosed with a gambling disorder with respect to mental disorder comorbidity, and (b) determine whether this relationship differed across younger (18–34 years old), middle-aged (35–54 years old), and older (55 years old and over) age groups. This study utilized data from the National Epidemiological Survey for Alcohol and Related Conditions. Results indicated that the prevalence of comorbid mental health/substance use disorders did not significantly change between the DSM-IV pathological gambling group and DSM-5 gambling disorder group in the overall sample. However, among older adults, the DSM-5 gambling disorder were more likely to exhibit any anxiety disorder as well as any comorbid mental health/substance-use disorder compared to the DSM-IV pathological gamblers. No other significant differences were observed in mental health or substance-use disorders within age-specific groupings. Findings suggest that the new, less restrictive DSM-5 criteria for gambling addiction capture older gamblers with more severe clinical presentations in terms of co-occurring mental disorders, contrary to our expectation that the lowered threshold for diagnosis would result in less severe clinical cases.
KeywordsDisordered gambling DSM Diagnostic Comorbidity Age
This study was funded by a Manitoba Gambling Research Program Studentship (Nicholson).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Mr. Nicholson declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Mackenzie declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Afifi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Sareen declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Almeida, D. M., & Horn, M. C. (2004). Is daily life more stressful during middle adulthood? In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 425–451). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Amstadter, A. B., Richardson, L., Acierno, R., Kilpatrick, D. G., Gaboury, M. T., Tran, T. L., et al. (2010). Does interviewer status matter? An examination of lay interviewers and medical doctor interviewers in an epidemiological study in Vietnam. International Perspectives in Victimology, 5(1), 55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Denis, C., Fatséas, M., & Auriacombe, M. (2012). Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of pathological gambling criteria. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 122(1–2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dowling, N. A., Cowlishaw, S., Jackson, A. C., Merkouris, S. S., Francis, K. L., & Christensen, D. R. (2015). Prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidity in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415575774.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fein, G., McGillivray, S., & Finn, P. (2007). Older adults make less advantageous decisions than younger adults: Cognitive and psychological correlates. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770707052X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Grant, B., Amsbary, M., & Chu, A. (2014). Source and accuracy statement: National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Google Scholar
- Grant, B. F., & Dawson, D. A. (2006). Introduction to the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcohol Research & Health, 29(2), 74–78.Google Scholar
- Grant, B. F., Dawson, D. A., Stinson, F. S., Chou, P. S., Kay, W., & Pickering, R. (2003). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): Reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71(1), 7–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, P., Dufour, M. C., Compton, W., et al. (2004). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Ogburn, E., & Grant, B. F. (2007). Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(7), 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haug, N. A., Padula, C. B., Sottile, J. E., Vandrey, R., Heinz, A. J., & Bonn-Miller, M. O. (2017). Cannabis use patterns and motives: A comparison of younger, middle-aged, and older medical cannabis dispensary patients. Addictive Behaviors, 72, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, G. (1996). Repeated measures analysis with discrete data using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- Parhami, I., Mojtabai, R., Rosenthal, R. J., Afifi, T. O., & Fong, T. W. (2014). Gambling and the onset of comorbid mental disorders: A longitudinal study evaluating severity and specific symptoms. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 20(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000450320.98988.7c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petry, N. M., Blanco, C., Auriacombe, M., Borges, G., Bucholz, K., Crowley, T. J., et al. (2014a). An overview of and rationale for changes proposed for pathological gambling in DSM-5. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9370-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Petry, N. M., Blanco, C., Jin, C., & Grant, B. F. (2014b). Concordance between gambling disorder diagnoses in the DSM-IV and DSM-5: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Disorders. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors : Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 586–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rennert, L., Denis, C., Peer, K., Lynch, K. G., Gelernter, J., & Kranzler, H. R. (2014). DSM-5 gambling disorder: Prevalence and characteristics in a substance use disorder sample. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034518.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds, K., Pietrzak, R. H., El-Gabalawy, R., Mackenzie, C. S., & Sareen, J. (2015). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in U.S. older adults: Findings from a nationally representative survey. World Psychiatry, 14(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sacco, P., Torres, L. R., Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Woods, C., & Unick, G. J. (2011). Differential item functioning of pathological gambling criteria: An examination of gender, race/ethnicity, and age. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(2), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9209-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schulte, M. T., & Hser, Y.-I. (2014). Substance use and associated health conditions throughout the lifespan. Public Health Reviews, 35(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sleczka, P., Braun, B., Piontek, D., Bühringer, G., & Kraus, L. (2015). DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder: Underlying structure and applicability to specific groups of gamblers. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Stinchfield, R., McCready, J., Turner, N. E., Jimenez-Murcia, S., Petry, N. M., Grant, J., et al. (2015). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder and comparison to DSM-IV. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Temcheff, C. E., Paskus, T. S., Potenza, M. N., & Derevensky, J. L. (2016). Which diagnostic criteria are most useful in discriminating between social gamblers and individuals with gambling problems? An examination of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9591-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tse, S., Hong, S.-I., Wang, C.-W., & Cunningham-Williams, R. M. (2012). Gambling behavior and problems among older adults: A systematic review of empirical studies. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(5), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar