Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 1341–1354 | Cite as

Impulsivity and Gambling Type Among Treatment-Seeking Disordered Gamblers: An Explorative Study

  • Vittorio Lutri
  • Emiliano Soldini
  • Silvia Ronzitti
  • Neil Smith
  • Massimo Clerici
  • Alex Blaszczynski
  • Henrietta Bowden-Jones
Original Paper

Abstract

Several studies have found that certain traits of impulsivity are associated with gambling disorder, and influence its severity. Furthermore, it has been suggested that some forms of gambling, particularly electronic gambling machines, are particularly widespread among pathological gamblers. In the present, exploratory study, we aim to clarify the role played by impulsivity in influencing the choice of specific gambling activities, by examining the relation between individual dimensions of impulsivity, and the choice of specific gambling activities in a clinical population. 100 consecutively admitted pathological gamblers at the National Problem Gambling Clinic in London (UK) in 2014 were administered the UPPS-P and BIS-11 impulsivity questionnaires, the Problem Gambling Severity Index, and underwent a structured interview concerning their gambling activities in the month and year prior to assessment. The correlation between individual gambling activities and impulsivity dimensions was analyzed both at a bivariate level, and using logistic regression. We found a significant correlation between Negative Urgency, Motor impulsivity and low-stakes machine gambling on multivariate analysis. Negative urgency (i.e. the tendency to act impulsively in response to negative affect), and Motor impulsivity (a tendency to rash action and restlessness) might be mediating factors in the choice of electronic gambling machines, particularly among patients whose gambling is escape-oriented. Structural and situational characteristics of gambling machines, particularly the widespread availability of low-stakes—rather than high-stakes—gaming machines, might concur to the choice of this form of gambling among individuals who present higher negative urgency and restlessness.

Keywords

Gambling disorder Pathological gambling Problem gambling Impulsivity Negative urgency Motor impulsivity UPPS-P Barrat impulsivity scale BIS-11 Gambling type Gambling activities Type of gambling Gambling machines Electronic gambling 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Allami, Y., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Carbonneau, R., Lacourse, É., & Tremblay, R. E. (2017). A longitudinal empirical investigation of the pathways model of problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(4), 1153–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). VA: Arlington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barratt, E. S. (1965). Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 16, 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechara, A., Damásio, A. R., Damásio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billieux, J., Lagrange, G., Van der Linden, M., Lançon, C., Adida, M., & Jeanningros, R. (2012a). Investigation of impulsivity in a sample of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers: A multidimensional perspective. Psychiatry Research, 198, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., Khazaal, Y., Zullino, D., & Clark, L. (2012b). Trait gambling cognitions predict near-miss experiences and persistence in laboratory slot machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaszczynski, A., Steel, Z., & McConaghy, N. (1997). Impulsivity in pathological gambling: The antisocial impulsivist. Addiction, 92(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breen, R. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2002). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunborg, G. S., Hanss, D., Mentzoni, R. A., Molde, H., & Pallesen, S. (2016). Problem gambling and the five-factor model of personality: A large population-based study. Addiction, 111(8), 1428–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canale, N., Vieno, A., Bowden-Jones, H., & Billieux, J. (2017). The benefits of using the UPPS model of impulsivity rather than the Big Five when assessing the relationship between personality and problem gambling. Addiction, 112(2), 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coates, E., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Predictors of return rate discrimination in slot machine play. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2007). Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalley, J. W., Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69, 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the “crack-cocaine”of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellery, M., Stewart, S. H., & Loba, P. (2005). Alcohol’s effects on video lottery terminal (VLT) play among probable pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferris, J. A., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  18. Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gambling Commission. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey 2010. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Grall-Bronnec, M., Wainstein, L., Feuillet, F., Bouju, G., Rocher, B., Vénisse, J.-L., et al. (2012). Clinical profiles as a function of level and type of impulsivity in a sample group of at-risk and pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Disordered gambling, type of gambling and gambling involvement in the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. European Journal of Public Health, 21, 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence, A. J., Luty, J., Bogdan, N. A., Sahakian, B. J., & Clark, L. (2009). Impulsivity and response inhibition in alcohol dependence and problem gambling. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 207, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ledgerwood, D. M., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research, 144, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leeman, R. F., & Potenza, M. N. (2012). Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: A focus on impulsivity and compulsivity. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 219, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marazziti, D., Picchetti, M., Baroni, S., Consoli, G., Ceresoli, D., Massimetti, G., et al. (2014). Pathological gambling and impulsivity: An Italian study. Rivista Di Psichiatria, 49, 95–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Michalczuk, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Clark, L. (2011). Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: A preliminary report. Psychological Medicine, 41, 2625–2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moeller, F., & Barratt, E. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman, J. P., Widom, C. S., & Nathan, S. (1985). Passive avoidance in syndromes of disinhibition: psychopathy and extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Impulsivity and pathological gambling: A descriptive model. International Gambling Studies, 6, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patton, J., & Stanford, M. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petry, N. M. (2001). Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petry, N. M. (2003). A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction, 98, 645–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petry, N. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., Fay, C., & Evans, L. G. (2011). Gambling on electronic gaming machines is an escape from negative self reflection. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ronzitti, S., Soldini, E., Lutri, V., Smith, N., Clerici, M., & Bowden-Jones, H. (2016). Types of gambling and levels of harm: A UK study to assess severity of presentation in a treatment-seeking population. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(3), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanford, M. S., Mathias, C. W., Dougherty, D. M., Lake, S. L., Anderson, N. E., & Patton, J. H. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swann, A. C., Bjork, J. M., Moeller, F. G., & Dougherty, D. M. (2002). Two models of impulsivity: Relationship to personality traits and psychopathology. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 988–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verdejo-García, A., Lawrence, A. J., & Clark, L. (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: Review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 777–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). A qualitative investigation of problem gambling as an escape-based coping strategy. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 80, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine and SurgeryUniversità degli Studi di Milano – BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Methodology and Statistics Laboratory, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social CareUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern SwitzerlandMannoSwitzerland
  3. 3.National Problem Gambling ClinicCentral North West London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations