As technology has developed, the international gambling market has changed markedly in recent years. The supply of internet-based gambling opportunities has become ever more significant. At the same time, the introduction of new gambling opportunities always brings a demand for evidence-based scientific evaluation, with regard to the associated risks of addiction. Simulated internet gambling, which is the focus of this study, represents a relatively new product group located at the interface between gambling and computer gaming. Concerns have been raised in scientific literature, especially with regard to the adolescent age group, as to whether participation in simulated internet gambling directly promotes recruitment to the world of monetary gambling, as defined in the gateway hypothesis. The research design was based on a standardized, representative longitudinal survey (over a 1-year period) with a total of 1178 school pupils from Northern Germany (M = 13.6 years; 47.5% male). It must be borne in mind that 12% of the adolescents belonged to the subgroup of “onset gamblers” and first reported experience with monetary gambling at the second stage of surveying. Logistic regression analysis demonstrates that this migration process is fostered by (1) participation from home in simulated gambling on social networks and (2) significant exposure to advertising (relating to both simulated and monetary gambling). Within the subgroup of simulated internet gamblers, variables such as particular patterns of use (including breadth and depth of involvement with simulated internet gambling, certain motives for participation, and microtransactions) do not serve as significant predictors. Despite this, important needs for action for the purposes of prevention and research can be identified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abarbanel, B., Gainsbury, S. M., King, D., Hing, N., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2017). Gambling games on social platforms: How do advertisements for social casino games target young adults? Policy & Internet, 9, 184–209.
Ahern, K., & Le Brocque, R. (2005). Methodological issues in the effects of attrition: Simple solutions for social scientists. Field Methods, 17, 53–69.
Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., & Li, E. (2018). An exploration how simulated gambling games may promote gambling with money. Journal of Gambling Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9742-6.
Bednarz, J., Delfabbro, P., & King, D. (2013). Practice makes poorer: Practice gambling modes and their effects on real-play in simulated roulette. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 381–395.
Clemens, F., Hanewinkel, R., & Morgenstern, M. (2017). Exposure to gambling advertisements and gambling behavior in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 1–13.
Delfabbro, P., King, D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). From adolescent to adult gambling: An analysis of longitudinal gambling patterns in South Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 547–563.
Derevensky, J. L., & Gainsbury, S. M. (2016). Social casino gaming and adolescents: Should we be concerned and is regulation in sight? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 44, 1–6.
Derevensky, J. L., Gainsbury, S. M., Gupta, R., & Ellery, M. (2013). Play-for-fun/social-casino gambling: An examination of our current knowledge. Final report to the Manitoba Gambling Research Program Canada).
Downs, C. (2010). Young people playing with risk: Social networking and the normalisation of gambling behaviours. In M. Stuart-Hoyle & J. Lovell (Eds.), Leisure experiences: Space, place and performance (pp. 25–47). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
Dussault, F., Brunelle, N., Kairouz, S., Rousseau, M., Leclerc, D., Tremblay, J., et al. (2017). Transition from playing with simulated gambling games to gambling with real money: A longitudinal study in adolescence. International Gambling Studies, 17, 386–400.
Elton-Marshall, T., Leatherdale, S. T., & Turner, N. E. (2016). An examination of Internet and land-based gambling among adolescents in three Canadian provinces: Results from the youth gambling survey (YGS). BMC Public Health, 16, 277.
Frahn, T., Delfabbro, P., & King, D. L. (2015). Exposure to free-play modes in simulated online gaming increases risk-taking in monetary gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1531–1543.
Gainsbury, S. (2012). Internet gambling: Current research findings and implications. New York: Springer.
Gainsbury, S., Hing, N., Delfabbro, P. H., Dewar, G., & King, D. L. (2014a). An exploratory study of interrelationships between social casino gaming, gambling, and problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13, 136–153.
Gainsbury, S. M., Hing, N., Delfabbro, P. H., & King, D. L. (2014b). A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies, 14, 196–213.
Gainsbury, S. M., King, D. L., Russell, A. M. T., & Delfabbro, P. (2016a). Who pays to play freemium games? The profiles and motivations of players who make purchases within social casino games. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5, 221–230.
Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., & Hing, N. (2014c). An investigation of social casino gaming among land-based and internet gamblers: A comparison of socio-demographic characteristics, gambling and co-morbidities. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 126–135.
Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., King, D. L., Delfabbro, P., & Hing, N. (2016b). Migration from social casino games to gambling: Motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 59–67.
Gambling Commission (2017). Young people and gambling 2017: A research study among 11–16 year olds in Great Britain. Available at: http://live-gamblecom.cloud.contensis.com/PDF/survey-data/Young-People-and-Gambling-2017-Report.pdf.
Gavriel Fried, B., Teichman, M., & Rahav, G. (2010). Adolescent gambling: Temperament, sense of coherence and exposure to advertising. Addiction Research & Theory, 18, 586–598.
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.
Gürtler, D., Rumpf, H.-J., Bischof, A., Kastirke, N., Meerkerk, G.-J., John, U., et al. (2014). Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Normierung der deutschen Version der Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) [Psychometric properties and norm values of the German version of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS)]. Diagnostica, 61, 210–221.
Hayer, T. (2012). Jugendliche und glücksspielbezogene Probleme: Risikobedingungen, Entwicklungmodelle und Implikationen für präventive Handlungsstrategien [Adolescents and gambling-related problems: Risk factors, developmental models, and implications for preventive actions]. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
Hayer, T., & Brosowski, T. (2016). Simuliertes Glücksspiel im Internet: Anmerkungen zu möglichen (Sucht-)Gefahren aus psychologischer Sicht [Simulated gambling activities online: Remarks on potential risks from a psychological point of view]. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 97, 4–12.
Hayer, T., Meyer, G., & Petermann, F. (2016). FGP-J: Fragebogen zu glücksspielbezogenen Problemen im Jugendalter [FGP-J: Questionnaire on gambling-related problems in adolescence]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hayer, T., Rosenkranz, M., Meyer, G., & Brosowski, T. (2018, submitted for publication). Simuliertes Glücksspiel im Internet: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung von Schülern und Schülerinnen zu Konsummustern und Risikobedingungen [Simulated gambling online: Results of a representative school-based survey with regard to consumption patterns and risk factors].
Hollingshead, S. J., Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., & Derevensky, J. (2016). The social casino gaming-gambling link: Motivation for playing social casino games determines whether self-reported gambling increases or decreases among disordered gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 33, 52–67.
Jacques, C., Fortin-Guichard, D., Bergeron, P. Y., Boudreault, C., Lévesque, D., & Giroux, I. (2016). Gambling content in Facebook games: A common phenomenon? Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 48–53.
Kim, H. S., Hollingshead, S., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2017a). Who spends money to play for free? Identifying who makes micro-transactions on social casino games (and why). Journal of Gambling Studies, 33, 525–538.
Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2016). From the mouths of social media users: A focus group study exploring the social casino gaming-online gambling link. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5, 115–121.
Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2017b). Why do young adults gamble online? A qualitative study of motivations to transition from social casino games to online gambling. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 7, 6.
Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., Salmon, M. M., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2015). Do social casino gamers migrate to online gambling? An assessment of migration rate and potential predictors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1819–1831.
King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2016a). Early exposure to digital simulated gambling: A review and conceptual model. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 198–206.
King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2016b). Adolescents’ perceptions of parental influences on commercial and simulated gambling activities. International Gambling Studies, 16, 424–441.
King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 175–187.
King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Kaptsis, D., & Zwaans, T. (2014). Adolescent simulated gambling via digital and social media: An emerging problem. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 305–313.
King, D. L., Russell, A., Gainsbury, S., Delfabbro, P. H., & Hing, N. (2016). The cost of virtual wins: An examination of gambling-related risks in youth who spend money on social casino games. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5, 401–409.
LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Gray, H. M. (2014). Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding Internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 396–403.
McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2009). Internet gambling behaviour in a sample of online gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 149–167.
McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2012). Internet gambling and risk-taking among students: An exploratory study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 1, 50–58.
Meyer, G., Brosowski, T., von Meduna, M., & Hayer, T. (2015). Simuliertes Glücksspiel: Analyse und Synthese empirischer Literaturbefunde zu Spielen in internetbasierten sozialen Netzwerken, in Form von Demoversionen sowie Computer- und Videospielen [Simulated gambling: Analysis and synthesis of empirical findings on games in internet-based social networks, in the form of demo versions, and computer and video games]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 23, 153–168.
Nkansah-Amankra, S., & Minelli, M. (2016). “Gateway hypothesis” and early drug use: Additional findings from tracking a population-based sample of adolescents to adulthood. Preventive Medicine Reports, 4, 134–141.
Parke, J., Wardle, H., Rigbye, J., & Parke, A. (2012). Exploring social gambling: Scoping, classification and evidence review. London: Gambling Commission.
Petry, N. M., Rehbein, F., Gentile, D. A., Lemmens, J. S., Rumpf, H.-J., Mößle, T., et al. (2014). An international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction, 109, 1399–1406.
Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99, 757–769.
Reimers, S., Maylor, E. A., Stewart, N., & Chater, N. (2009). Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 973–978.
Rose, N. (2014). Should social casino games be regulated? Gaming Law Review and Economics, 18, 134–137.
Scharkow, M., Festl, R., Vogelgesang, J., & Quandt, T. (2012). Choosing digital games: The relationship between gaming motives and genre preferences. In Paper prepared for the ICA 2012 Conference, May 24–28, 2012, Phoenix (Arizona). Available at: http://underused.org/docs/scharkow_festl_vogelgesang_quandt_ica12.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2017.
Sévigny, S., Cloutier, M., Pelletier, M.-F., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Internet gambling: Misleading payout rates during the ‘demo’ period. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 153–158.
Wohl, M. J. A., Salmon, M. M., Hollingshead, S. J., & Kim, H. S. (2017). An examination of the relationship between social casino gaming and gambling: The bad, the ugly, and the good. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2017.35.1.
We should like to express our thanks to all participating schools and school pupils, without whose generous involvement it would not have been possible to obtain knowledge of this kind.
This study was developed with research funding from the Hamburg Department of Health and Consumer Protection. The funding was not subject to any restrictions or specific instructions with regard to data collection, analysis or interpretation, or to publication of the results.
Conflict of interest
Gerhard Meyer has received grants for gambling research from the German Research Foundation, the Federal Ministry of Health, the Ministries of Health of North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and Bremen, the Ministry of the Interior of Hesse and Lower Saxony, and several gambling providers. Jens Kalke has received grants for gambling research from the Federal Ministry of Health, the Ministries of Health of Hamburg, Hesse and Schleswig-Holstein, several federal lottery companies and state-licenced casinos. Tobias Hayer and Tim Brosowski declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. A written declaration of agreement from parents was a general precondition of participation in the study. In addition and regardless of this, the young persons were able at any time to refuse to participate in the survey. Matching of an individual’s questionnaires from different stages for data analysis purposes relied on a coding system that guaranteed the anonymity of participants in all cases.
About this article
Cite this article
Hayer, T., Kalke, J., Meyer, G. et al. Do Simulated Gambling Activities Predict Gambling with Real Money During Adolescence? Empirical Findings from a Longitudinal Study. J Gambl Stud 34, 929–947 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9755-1
- Simulated gambling
- Longitudinal study
- School survey
- Gambling onset