Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 1185–1203 | Cite as

Social Explanations of Lottery Play: New Evidence Based on National Survey Data

  • Mark LutterEmail author
  • Daria Tisch
  • Jens Beckert
Original Paper


This study examines the social contexts of gambling and analyzes social motivations for playing the lottery. We test three sociological approaches simultaneously: network effects, consumption theory, and strain theory. The data used (SOEP-IS, N = 5868 individuals) has several advantages beyond being a large-scale representative sample of the German population. With information on households, we can analyze social network effects while avoiding the problems of egocentric network data. Another benefit of the SOEP-IS is the panel structure. We use the panel structure to improve measurements of strain theory by using the decline in income over time as a measure for it. Our results suggest that the three theories explain different aspects of lottery play. Networks seem to have an influence on lottery play. Having another person in the household playing the lottery is positively associated with both the probability of playing (regularly) and expenditures on lottery tickets. Daydreams and the belief in good luck are positively associated with lottery play as well. Strain theory is confirmed insofar as we find that a decline in income is significantly related to expenditures but not to the probability of playing the lottery. Overall, this study suggests that people play the lottery depending on their social surroundings, their desire to participate in a world normally out of their reach, and the tensions they feel from the distance between their aspirations and their actual social position.


Lottery play Sociology Social networks Strain theory Imaginative values 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. Adams, D. J. (1996). Playing the lottery. Social action, social networks and accounts of motive. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D. J. (2001). My ticket, my ‘self’: Lottery ticket number selection and the commodification and extension of the self. Sociological Spectrum, 21(4), 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2011). Lottery gambling: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 15–33. Scholar
  4. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V., & Chanchalermporn, N. (2007). A test of social cognitive theory reciprocal and sequential effects: Hope, superstitious belief and environmental factors among lottery gamblers in Thailand. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 201–214. Scholar
  5. Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckert, J., & Lutter, M. (2009). The inequality of fair play: Lottery gambling and social stratification in Germany. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 475–488. Scholar
  7. Beckert, J., & Lutter, M. (2013). Why the poor play the lottery: Sociological approaches to explaining class-based lottery play. Sociology, 47(6), 1152–1170. Scholar
  8. Beyerlein, K., & Sallaz, J. J. (2017). Faith’s Wager: How religion deters gambling. Social Science Research, 62, 204–218. Scholar
  9. Binde, P. (2009). Gambling motivation and involvement. A review of social science research. Östersund: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
  10. Binde, P. (2013). Why people gamble: A model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloch, H. A. (1951). The sociology of gambling. American Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browne, B. A., & Brown, D. J. (1994). Predictors of lottery gambling among American college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burger, M. J., Hendriks, M., Pleeging, E., & van der Zwan, P. W. (2016). The silver linings of lottery play: Motivation and subjective well-being of British lottery participants. Applied Economics Letters. Scholar
  14. Cameron, C. A., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Casey, E. (2006). Domesticating gambling: Gender, caring and the UK national lottery. Leisure Studies, 25(1), 3–16. Scholar
  17. Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1991). Selling hope. State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day, L., & Maltby, J. (2003). Belief in good luck and psychological well-being: The mediating role of optimism and irrational beliefs. The Journal of Psychology, 137(1), 99–110. Scholar
  21. Devereux, E. C. (1980). Gambling and the social structure: A sociological study of lotteries and horse racing in contemporary America. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  22. Downes, D. M., Davies, B. P., David, M. E., & Stone, P. (1976). Gambling, work and leisure. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Felsher, J. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2003). Parental influences and social modelling of youth lottery participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(5), 361–377. Scholar
  24. Firestone, J. M., Garza, R. T., & Harris, R. J. (2005). Protestant work ethic and worker productivity in a Mexican Brewery. International Sociology, 20, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fluke, S. M., Webster, R. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2014). Methodological and theoretical improvements in the study of superstitious beliefs and behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 102–126. Scholar
  26. Forrest, D., Simmons, R., & Chesters, N. (2002). Buying a dream: Alternative models of demand for lotto. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 485–496. Scholar
  27. Frey, J. H. (1984). Gambling: A sociological review. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 474(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friehe, T., & Mechtel, M. (2015). Gambling to leapfrog in status? Review of Economics of the Household. Scholar
  29. Garvía, R. (2007). Syndication, institutionalization, and lottery play. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 603–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  31. Greco, R., & Curci, A. (2016). Does the general strain theory explain gambling and substance use? Journal of Gambling Studies. Scholar
  32. Guillén, M. F., Garvía, R., & Santana, A. (2012). Embedded play: Economic and social motivations for sharing lottery tickets. European Sociological Review, 28(3), 344–354. Scholar
  33. Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 283–295. Scholar
  34. Hu, Y., Wang, B., Liu, L., Li, G., Huang, X., & Guo, D. (2017). Is lottery playing always harmful? Development of the lottery playing health scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(9), 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Humphreys, B. R., & Perez, L. (2013). Syndicated play in lottery games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 124–131. Scholar
  36. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. Scholar
  37. Kocher, M. G., Krawczyk, M., & van Winden, F. (2014). ‘Let me dream on!’ Anticipatory emotions and preference for timing in lotteries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 98, 29–40. Scholar
  38. Ladouceur, R., Dube, D., Giroux, I., Legendre, N., & Gaudet, C. (1995). Cognitive biases in gambling—American Roulette and 6/49-Lottery. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 473–479.Google Scholar
  39. Lutter, M. (2012). Tagträume und Konsum. Die imaginative Qualität von Gütern am Beispiel der Nachfrage für Lotterien. Soziale Welt, 63(3), 233–251.Google Scholar
  40. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olason, D. T., Hayer, T., Brosowski, T., & Meyer, G. (2015). Gambling in the mist of economic crisis: Results from three national prevalence studies from Iceland. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632. Scholar
  45. Pravichai, S., & Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2014). Superstitious beliefs and problem gambling among Thai lottery gamblers: The mediation effects of number search and gambling intensity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(4), 1633–1649. Scholar
  46. Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2012). SOEP innovation sample (SOEP-IS)Description, structure and documentation. SOEPpaper 463. Berlin: DIW Berlin.Google Scholar
  47. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling. A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It could be us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK national lottery play. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosecrance, J. (1986). Why regular gamblers don’t quit: A sociological perspective. Sociological Perspectives, 29(3), 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sarti, S., & Triventi, M. (2017). The role of social and cognitive factors in individual gambling: An empirical study on college students. Social Science Research, 62, 219–237. Scholar
  51. Smith, A. (1904 [1776]). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Retrieved February 9, 2017 from the World Wide Web:
  52. SOEP IS. (2014). SOEP-IS Release 2014, data 1998-2014.
  53. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2017). Predictors of problem gambling in the US. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WuppertalWuppertalGermany
  2. 2.University of CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute for the Study of SocietiesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations