Does the General Strain Theory Explain Gambling and Substance Use?
General Strain Theory (GST: Agnew Criminology 30:47–87, 1992) posits that deviant behaviour results from adaptation to strain and the consequent negative emotions. Empirical research on GST has mainly focused on aggressive behaviours, while only few research studies have considered alternative manifestations of deviance, like substance use and gambling. The aim of the present study is to test the ability of GST to explain gambling behaviours and substance use. Also, the role of family in promoting the adoption of gambling and substance use as coping strategies was verified. Data from 266 families with in mean 8 observations for each group were collected. The multilevel nature of the data was verified before appropriate model construction. The clustered nature of gambling data was analysed by a two-level Hierarchical Linear Model while substance use was analysed by Multivariate Linear Model. Results confirmed the effect of strain on gambling and substance use while the positive effect of depressive emotions on these behaviours was not supported. Also, the impact of family on the individual tendency to engage in addictive behaviours was confirmed only for gambling.
KeywordsStrain event Negative emotion Substance use Family addiction
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Agnew, R. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, 15, 101–123.Google Scholar
- Aymamí, N., Granero, R., Penelo, E., Fernández-Aranda, F., Isabel, K., Gunnard, K., et al. (2014). Anger in pathological gambling: Clinical, psychopathological, and personality correlates. The Spanish Journal of Psycholology, 17(E39), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136.Google Scholar
- Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Grant, J. E., & Potenza, M. N. (Eds.). (2008). Pathological gambling: A clinical guide to treatment. American Psychiatric Pub: Arlington.Google Scholar
- Gupta, R. (2000). Towards testing a general theory of addictions: An examination of gambling, risk–taking, and related personality variables in adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences). 60, 4331 (12-A).Google Scholar
- Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis (p. 126). Amsterdam: TT-publikaties.Google Scholar
- Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Weber, M. D., Dwyer, J. H., Baer, N., MacKinnon, D. P., et al. (1990). Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(4), 447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman, F., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2002). The relationship between life stresses, coping styles and gambling behavior among adolescents. In Poster presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Problem Gambling, Dallas.Google Scholar
- Khantzian, E. J., Golden, S. J., & McAuliffe, W. E. (1999). Group therapy Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment. Washington: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- Kilpatrick, D. G., Ruggiero, K. J., Acierno, R., Saunders, B. E., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2003). Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: results from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 692.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Koch, G. G. (1982). Intraclass correlation coefficient. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (213–217) (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Ledgerwood, D. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Petry, N. M. (2007). Clinical Features and Treatment Prognosis of Pathological Gamblers With and Without Recent Gambling Related Illegal Behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35(3), 294–301.Google Scholar
- Makela, C. J. (2000). Youth gambling: A consumer issue. Consumer Interests Annual, 46, 218.Google Scholar
- Manski, C. F., Pepper, J. V., & Thomas, Y. F. (Eds.). (1999). Assessment of two cost-effectiveness studies on cocaine control policy. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Miller-Day, M. A., Alberts, J., Hecht, M. L., Trost, M. R., & Krizek, R. L. (2014). Adolescent relationships and drug use. Portland: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Wills, T. A., & Shiffman, S. (1985). Coping behavior and its relation to substance use: A conceptual framework. In S. Shiffman & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping and substance use. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Zinzow, H. M., Ruggiero, K. J., Resnick, H., Hanson, R., Smith, D., Saunders, B., et al. (2009). Prevalence and mental health correlates of witnessed parental and community violence in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 441–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar