Prevalence of Problem Gambling Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Modes of Access, Gambling Activities, and Levels of Severity
The high availability and accessibility of online gambling have recently caused public concern regarding the potential increase of gambling-related problems among young people. Nonetheless, few studies among adults and none among adolescents have explored specific characteristics of gamblers as a function of gambling venues to date. This study sought to analyze the prevalence of gambling among a sample of adolescents in the last year, as well as sociodemographic and gambling-related characteristics as possible predictors of at-risk and problem gambling. The sample comprised 1313 adolescents aged 14–18 years. Participants were asked to respond to several questions regarding their gambling behavior. Chi square and ANOVA tests were performed in order to explore differences between groups, and a set of multinomial regressions established significant severity predictors. The prevalence of at-risk and problem gambling was 4 and 1.2 %, respectively. Regression analyses showed that having a relative with gambling problems predicted at-risk gambling. Both living with only one parent or not living with parents at all, and the prevalence of Electronic Gambling Machines in the last year were associated with problem gambling. Mixed-mode gambling was a predictor of both at-risk and problem gambling. Our findings extend previous research on gambling among adolescents by exploring gambling behavior according to different modes of access. Although the prevalence of exclusive online gambling among the total sample was low, these results support the need to consider specific subgroups of gamblers and their concrete related features when conducting both indicated prevention and treatment protocols for adolescents.
KeywordsGambling Adolescents Problem gambling predictors Mode of access SOGS-RA
The authors wish to thank the education authorities, the schools, their staff, and their students for their participation in the study.
Funding for this study was provided by the Council for Economy and Work (FC-15-GRUPIN14-047). This institution had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Blaszczynski, A. (2013). A critical examination of the link between gaming machines and gambling-related harm. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 7(3), 55–76.Google Scholar
- Canale, N., Griffiths, M. D., Vieno, A., Siciliano, V., & Molinaro, S. (2016). Impact of Internet gambling on problem gambling among adolescents in Italy: Findings from a large-scale nationally representative survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castren, S., Grainger, M., Lahti, T., Alho, H., & Salonen, A. H. (2015). At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 10, 9. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0003-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Dixon, R. W., Youssef, G. J., Hasking, P., Yücel, M., Jackson, A. C., & Dowling, N. A. (2016). The relationship between gambling attitudes, involvement, and problems in adolescence: Examining the moderating role of coping strategies and parenting styles. Addictive Behaviors, 58, 42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elton-Marshall, T., Leatherdale, S. T., & Turner, N. E. (2016). An examination of internet and land-based gambling among adolescents in three Canadian provinces: Results from the youth gambling survey (YGS). BMC Public Health, 16(1), 277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2933-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Essau, C. A. (Ed.). (2008). Adolescent addiction: Epidemiology—Assessment and treatment. United States: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Blaszczynski, A., & Hing, N. (2015). The interaction between gambling activities and modes of access: A comparison of internet-only, land-based only, and mixed-mode gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 41, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2010). Adolescent gambling on the internet: A review. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine & Health, 22(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Gainsbury, S., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Russell, A. (2014). Interactive gambling: Gambling Research Australia. http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/resources/6482d5fa-f068-41e5-921f-facd4f10365e/interactive+gambling.pdf.
- Leeman, R. F., Hoff, R. A., Krishnan-Sarin, S., Patock-Peckham, J. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and part-time job status in relation to substance use and gambling in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(4), 460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olason, D. T., Kristjansdottir, E., Einarsdottir, H., Haraldsson, H., Bjarnason, G., & Derevensky, J. L. (2011). Internet gambling and problem gambling among 13 to 18 year old adolescents in Iceland. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 9, 257–263. doi: 10.1007/s11469-010-9280-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Potenza, M. N., Wareham, J. D., Steinberg, M. A., Rugle, L., Cavallo, D. A., Krishnan-Sarin, S., et al. (2011). Correlates of at-risk/problem internet gambling in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(2), 150–159.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.11.006.
- White, M. A., Mun, P., Kauffman, N., Whelan, C., Regan, M., & Kelly, J. E. (2006). Electronic gambling machines and problem gambling. Toronto: Responsible Gaming Council. http://www.slga.gov.sk.ca/Prebuilt/Public/EGM%20Study%20Full%20Report.pdf.
- Wood, R. T., Williams, R. J., & Lawton, P. K. (2007). Why do internet gamblers prefer online versus land-based venues? Some preliminary findings and implications. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 235–252.Google Scholar