Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 707–720 | Cite as

Jackpot Structural Features: Rollover Effect and Goal-Gradient Effect in EGM Gambling

  • En Li
  • Matthew J. Rockloff
  • Matthew Browne
  • Phillip Donaldson
Original Paper

Abstract

Relatively little research has been undertaken on the influence of jackpot structural features on electronic gaming machine (EGM) gambling behavior. This study considered two common features of EGM jackpots: progressive (i.e., the jackpot incrementally growing in value as players make additional bets), and deterministic (i.e., a guaranteed jackpot after a fixed number of bets, which is determined in advance and at random). Their joint influences on player betting behavior and the moderating role of jackpot size were investigated in a crossed-design experiment. Using real money, players gambled on a computer simulated EGM with real jackpot prizes of either $500 (i.e., small jackpot) or $25,000 (i.e., large jackpot). The results revealed three important findings. Firstly, players placed the largest bets (20.3 % higher than the average) on large jackpot EGMs that were represented to be deterministic and non-progressive. This finding was supportive of a hypothesized ‘goal-gradient effect’, whereby players might have felt subjectively close to an inevitable payoff for a high-value prize. Secondly, large jackpots that were non-deterministic and progressive also promoted high bet sizes (17.8 % higher than the average), resembling the ‘rollover effect’ demonstrated in lottery betting, whereby players might imagine that their large bets could be later recouped through a big win. Lastly, neither the hypothesized goal-gradient effect nor the rollover effect was evident among players betting on small jackpot machines. These findings suggest that certain high-value jackpot configurations may have intensifying effects on player behavior.

Keywords

Electronic gaming machine (EGM) Jackpot Progressive Deterministic Jackpot size Gambling intensity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was fully funded by Gambling Research Australia, a partnership between the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments. A previous version of this paper has been submitted and published as part of a research report commissioned by Gambling Research Australia.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest are declared.

References

  1. Beenstock, M., & Haitovsky, Y. (2001). Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 721–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., Gainsbury, S., & Karlov, L. (2014). Blue Gum gaming machine: An evaluation of responsible gambling features. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(3), 697–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S. (1948). Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41(6), 450–465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne, M., Langham, E., Rockloff, M. J., Li, E., Donaldson, P., & Goodwin, B. (2014). EGM jackpots and player behavior: An in-venue shadowing study. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9485-y.
  5. Cervone, D., Orom, H., Artistico, D., Shadel, W. G., & Kassel, J. D. (2007). Using a knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture to understand consistency and variability in smokers’ self-efficacy appraisals in high-risk situations. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(1), 44–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenberger, R., & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1116–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell, L., Morgenroth, E., & Walker, I. (1999). A time series analysis of U.K. lottery sales: Long and short run price elasticities. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Prepared for the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, R. S., McCarthy, D. M., Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2005). Automatic effects of alcohol cues on sexual attraction. Addiction, 100(5), 672–681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, R. S., McCarthy, D. M., Pedersen, S. L., & Hicks, J. A. (2009). Alcohol expectancy priming and drinking behavior: The role of compatibility between prime and expectancy content. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 329–333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrigan, K., Dixon, M., & Brown, D. (2014). Modern multi-line slot machine games: The effect of lines wagered on winners, losers, bonuses, and losses disguised as wins. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9436-z.
  13. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Hull, C. L. (1934). The rats’ speed of locomotion gradient in the approach to food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17(3), 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 67–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R. M., & Nora, R. M. (1988). The Lie/Bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychological Reports, 83(3 Part 2), 1219–1224.Google Scholar
  17. Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 43(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Millhouse, H., & Delfabbro, P. (2008). Investigating preferences for gaming machine features in problem and non-problem gamblers using a consumer choice methodology. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 20(1), 37–49.Google Scholar
  20. Rockloff, M. J., Donaldson, P., & Browne, M. (2014). Jackpot expiry: An experimental investigation of a new EGM player-protection feature. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9472-3.
  21. Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., & Evans, L. G. (2012). The effect of mere presence on electronic gaming machine gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 27, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., Fay, C., & Evans, L. G. (2011). Gambling on electronic gaming machines is an escape from negative self reflection. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 63–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rockloff, M., & Hing, N. (2013). The impact of jackpots on EGM gambling behavior: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 775–790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers, P., & Webley, P. (2001). “It could be us!”: Cognitive and social psychological factors in UK National Lottery play. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(1), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Coughlan, M. J., Enersen, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Structural changes to electronic gaming machines as effective harm minimization strategies for non-problem and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 503–520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wohl, M. J., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 703–717.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Ziolkowski, S. (2014). The world count of gaming machines 2013. Prepared for the Gaming Technologies Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • En Li
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Rockloff
    • 1
  • Matthew Browne
    • 1
  • Phillip Donaldson
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Queensland UniversityQueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations