Skip to main content

What’s in a Name? Assessing the Accuracy of Self-identifying as a Professional or Semi-Professional Gambler

Journal of Gambling Studies volume 31, pages 1799–1818 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Growing interest in pursuing a professional gambling career has been accompanied by a rise in individuals self-identifying as professional gamblers. Whether this trend reflects an actual increase in individuals sustaining livelihoods from gambling or inaccurate appropriation of a now glamorized identity is unclear. Adopting a self-image of professional gambler in the absence of ability to earn a sustainable income from the activity may increase risk of problem gambling and deter help-seeking. However, extent of problem gambling in this cohort is uncertain. This study aimed to: (1) determine any differences that might validate the self-reported identity of professional and semi-professional gamblers by investigating characteristics and behaviors that distinguish them from amateur gamblers; and (2) identify characteristics and behaviors that distinguish between self-identified semi-professional/professional gamblers with and without gambling problems. In an online survey of 4,594 Australian gamblers, 1.2 % identified as professional gamblers, 6.8 % as semi-professional gamblers, and 92.0 % as amateur gamblers. Self-identified professional and semi-professional gamblers were distinguished from amateur gamblers by preference for skill-based gambling, higher reported likelihood of winning, and greater use of online gambling and multiple online operators. Two-fifths of professional and three-fifths of semi-professional gamblers scored as moderate risk or problem gamblers, but negative consequences were more likely personal, interpersonal and work/study related, rather than financial. Although results support the general accuracy of self-reported semi/professional gambling status, measures are needed to help semi/professional gamblers distinguish whether their gambling is a problem or profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 494–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerg, O. (2010). Problem gambling in poker: Money, rationality and control in a skill-based social game. International Gambling Studies, 10(3), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Steel, Z., & McConaghy, N. (1997). Impulsivity in pathological gambling: The antisocial impulsivist. Addiction, 92, 75–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Rodgers, B., Davidson, T., & Sims, S. (2013). Stigma and help-seeking for gambling problems. Canberra: ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotte, J. (1997). Chances, trances, and lots of slots: Gambling motives and consumption experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(4), 380–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K. R., & Constable, B. (1999). Physiological arousal and sensation-seeking in female fruit machine gamblers. Addiction, 94, 425–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Australasian gambling review (5th ed.). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimanche, F., & Samdahl, D. (1994). Leisure as symbolic consumption: A conceptualization and prospects for future research. Leisure Sciences, 16, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainsbury, S. (2012). Internet gambling: Current research findings and implications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gainsbury, S, Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013). How the Internet is changing gambling: Findings from an Australian prevalence survey. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9404-7.

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2012). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., Parke, J., Wood, R., & Rigbye, J. (2010). Online poker gambling in university students: Further findings from an online survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T. W. (2006). A minute to learn and a lifetime to master: Implications of the poker craze for college campuses. New Directions for Student Services, 113, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. D. (1967). Gambling as work: A sociological study of the race track. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), Gambling (pp. 87–106). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Holdsworth, L., Tiyce, M., & Breen, H. (2014). Stigma and problem gambling: Current knowledge and future research directions. International Gambling Studies, 14(1), 64–81. doi:10.1080/14459795.2013.841722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horch, J., & Hodgins, D. (2008). Public stigma of disordered gambling: Social distance, dangerousness, and familiarity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(5), 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H. C., Lee, B., Park, M., & Stokowski, P. A. (2000). Measuring underlying meanings of gambling from the perspective of enduring involvement. Journal of Travel Research, 38(3), 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 171–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L., Hiripi, E., Mroczwk, D. K., Normand, S.-L. T., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalence and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., & Hiripi, E. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(2), 184–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kusyszyn, I. (1984). The psychology of gambling. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 474, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakey, C. E., Rose, P., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2008). Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: The mediating role of judgment and decision-making biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(2), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgerwood, D. M., & Petry, N. M. (2006). Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research, 144(1), 17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2004). Prize and risk-taking strategy in tournaments: Evidence from professional poker players. The Institute for the Study of Labor, discussion paper no. 1345, 1–23.

  • Lee, C. K., Lee, B., Bernhard, B. J., & Lee, T. K. (2009). A comparative study of involvement and motivation among casino gamblers. Psychiatry investigation, 6(3), 141–149.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(2), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, J. L. (2011). Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform Inquiry into Interactive Gambling. Retrieved 3 September 2013 from: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/interactive_online_gambling_advertising/submissions.htm.

  • Monaghan, S., Derevensky, J., & Sklar, A. (2008). Impact of gambling advertisements and marketing on children and adolescents: Policy recommendations to minimise harm. Journal of Gambling Issues, 22, 252–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomäki, J., Laakasuo, M., & Salmela, M. (2013). ‘Don’t worry, it’s just poker!’-experience, self-rumination and self-reflection as determinants of decision-making in on-line poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(3), 491–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s gambling industries (Report No. 10). Canberra: Ausinfo.

  • Radburn, B., & Horsley, R. (2011). Gamblers, grinders, and mavericks: The use of membership categorisation to manage identity by professional poker players. Journal of Gambling Issues, 26, 30–50.

  • Rosecrance, J. (1986). You can’t tell the players without a scorecard: A typology of horse players. Deviant Behavior, 7, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, J. (1988). Professional horse race gambling: Working without a safety net. Work and Occupations, 15, 220–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selin, S. W., & Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3), 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shead, N. W., Hodgins, D. C., & Scharf, D. (2008). Differences between poker players and non-poker-playing gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 8(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J. I., Russo, A. M., Adkins, B. J., & McCormick, R. A. (1986). Ego strength and achievement motivation in pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(2), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E. (1997). Dispositional predictors of problem gambling in male adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1769–1770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, J., Massura, C. E., & Petry, N. M. (2013). Professional and pathological gamblers: Similarities and differences. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(2), 205–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2007). ‘How much money do you spend on gambling?’ The comparative validity of question wordings used to assess gambling expenditure. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R. (2001). Mapping Internet gambling: Emerging modes of online participation in wagering and sports betting. International Gambling Studies, 3, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study that this paper is based on was commissioned by Gambling Research Australia—a partnership between the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments. Gambling Research Australia provided financial support for this project and approved this manuscript for publication. We would also like to thank Anastsia Hronis who completed a literature search and summary to inform this paper.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declares that they have no conflict of interest. They have received research funds from government and industry sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Gambling Education and Research, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, Australia

    Nerilee Hing, Alex Russell & Sally M. Gainsbury

  2. Gambling Treatment Clinic and Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Alex Blaszczynski

Authors
  1. Nerilee Hing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alex Blaszczynski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sally M. Gainsbury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nerilee Hing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hing, N., Russell, A., Blaszczynski, A. et al. What’s in a Name? Assessing the Accuracy of Self-identifying as a Professional or Semi-Professional Gambler. J Gambl Stud 31, 1799–1818 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9507-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9507-9

Keywords

  • Professional gamblers
  • Semi-professional gamblers
  • Self-identity
  • Self-image
  • Problem gambling
  • Internet gambling