Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1449–1461 | Cite as

Reciprocal Longitudinal Associations Between Adolescent Twin Gambling and Delinquency

  • Frank Vitaro
  • Amy C. Hartl
  • Brett Laursen
  • Mara Brendgen
  • Ginette Dionne
  • Michel Boivin
Original Paper
  • 296 Downloads

Abstract

This study examined sibling influence over gambling involvement and delinquency in a sample of 628 twins (151 male dyads, 163 female dyads). Self-reports of gambling involvement and delinquency were collected for each twin at ages 13, 14 and 15 years. Results revealed evidence of between-twin influence. Higher levels of an adolescent’s delinquency predicted an increase in his or her co-twin’s delinquency from age 13 to age 14 and from age 14 to age 15. In contrast, gambling behavior was unaffected by the co-twin’s gambling involvement. Within-twins, higher initial levels of delinquency predicted a subsequent increase in gambling behavior from age 13 to age 14 and again from age 14 to age 15, and higher initial levels of gambling involvement predicted an increase in delinquency from age 14 to age 15. Between and within siblings effects are discussed in light of the scant literature on (a) sibling influence on gambling, and (b) the links between gambling and delinquency.

Keywords

Twins Sibling influence Gambling Delinquency Adolescents Actor-partner interdependence model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec. We thank Jocelyn Malo and Marie-Elyse Bertrand for coordinating the data collection and Hélène Paradis for data management and preparation. We also thank the twins and their families as well as their friends for participating in this study. Brett Laursen received support from the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD068421) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (0909733).

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bank, L., Burraston, B., & Snyder, J. (2004). Sibling conflict and ineffective parenting as predictors of adolescent boys’ antisocial behavior and peer difficulties: Additive and interactional effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(1), 99–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.01401005.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Dintcheff, B. A. (1999). Gambling and alcohol use among youth: Influences of demographic, socialization, and individual factors. Addictive Behaviors, 24(6), 749–767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaver, K. M., Hoffman, T., Shields, R. T., Vaughn, M. G., DeLisi, M., & Wright, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in genetic and environmental influences on gambling: Results from a sample of twins from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Addiction, 105(3), 536–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02803.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Dionne, G., Dubois, L., Pérusse, D., Robaey, P., et al. (2013). The Quebec newborn twin study: 15 years later. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(1), 64–69. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhrmester, D. (1992). The developmental courses of sibling and peer relationships. In F. Boer & J. Dunn (Eds.), Children’s sibling relationship: Developmental and clinical issues (pp. 19–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Defoe, I. N., Keijsers, L., Hawk, S. T., Branje, S., Dubas, J. S., Buist, K., et al. (2013). Siblings versus parents and friends: Longitudinal linkages to adolescent externalizing problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(8), 881–889. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12049.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., Dickinson, L., & Deguire, A.-E. (2004). Prevention efforts toward reducing gambling problems. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 211–230). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forget-Dubois, N., Pérusse, D., Turecki, G., Girard, A., Billette, J.-M., Rouleau, G., et al. (2003). Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: Physical similarity, genotyping, and chorionicity. Twin Research, 6(6), 479–485. doi: 10.1375/136905203322686464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortuna, K., Goldner, I., & Knafo, A. (2010). Twin relationships: A comparison across monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, and nontwin siblings in early childhood. Family Science, 1(3–4), 205–211. doi: 10.1080/19424620.2010.569367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1997). Familial and social influences on juvenile gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(3), 179–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(4), 319–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, W., Krueger, R. F., Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M. (2002). The personalities of twins: Just ordinary folks. Twin Research, 5(2), 125–131. doi: 10.1375/1369052022992.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kendler, K. S., Jacobson, K., Myers, J. M., & Eaves, L. J. (2008). A genetically informative developmental study of the relationship between conduct disorder and peer deviance in males. Psychological Medicine, 38(7), 1001–1011. doi: 10.1017/s0033291707001821.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of non-independence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2(1), 67–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, J. Y., McHale, S. M., Osgood, D. W., & Crouter, A. C. (2006). Longitudinal course and family correlates of sibling relationships from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 77(6), 1746–1761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00971.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Pérusse, D., & Dionne, G. (2006). Do friendships and sibling relationships provide protection against peer victimization in a similar way? Social Development, 15(3), 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laursen, B. (2005). Dyadic and group perspectives on close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 97–100. doi: 10.1080/01650250444000450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laursen, B., Popp, D., Burk, W. J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: Examples from the study of homophily and homogeneity. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research (pp. 11–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. LeBlanc, M., & Fréchette, M. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth: Multilevel and developmental perspective. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loeber, R. (1990). Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magoon, M. E., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (2005). Juvenile delinquency and adolescent gambling: Implications for the juvenile justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(6), 690–713. doi: 10.1177/0093854805279948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moffitt, T. E. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behaviors: Evidence from behavioral-genetic research. In J. Hall (Ed.), Advances in genetics (Vol. 55, pp. 41–104). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  27. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). MPlus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  28. Neyer, F. J. (2002). Twin relationships in old age: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(2), 155–177. doi: 10.1177/0265407502192001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 127–141. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Popp, D., Laursen, B., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. J. (2008). Modeling homophily over time with an actor-partner interdependence model. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1028–1039. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1028.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulkkinen, L., Vaalamo, I., Hietala, R., Kaprio, J., & Rose, R. J. (2003). Peer reports of adaptive behavior in twins and singletons: Is twinship a risk or an advantage? Twin Research, 6(2), 106–118. doi: 10.1375/136905203321536236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Québec, S., Jetté, M., Desrosiers, H., & Tremblay, R. E. (1998). “In 2001…I’ll be 5 years old!” Survey of 5-month old infants. Preliminary report of the Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Québec. Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec.Google Scholar
  33. Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose, R. J. (2002). How do adolescents select their friends? A behavior-genetic perspective. In L. Pulkkinen, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Paths to successful development: Personality in the life course (pp. 106–125, ch 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, D. C., & Gulley, B. L. (1992). Sibling effects on substance use and delinquency. Criminology, 30(2), 217–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01103.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slomkowski, C., Rende, R., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2001). Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: Evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 72(1), 271–283. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Snyder, H. (2001). Epidemiology of official offending. In R. Loeber & D. Farrington (Eds.), Child delinquents: Development, intervention, and service needs (pp. 25–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stormshak, E. A., Comeau, C. A., & Shepard, S. A. (2004). The relative contribution of sibling deviance and peer deviance in the prediction of substance use across middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(6), 635–649. doi: 10.1023/B:JACP.0000047212.49463.c7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorpe, K., & Gardner, K. (2006). Twins and their friendships: Differences between monozygotic, dizygotic same-sex and dizygotic mixed-sex pairs. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9(1), 155–164. doi: 10.1375/183242706776402984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tuvblad, C., & Baker, L. (2011). Human aggression across the lifespan: Genetic propensities and environmental moderators (ch 8). In R. Huber, P. Brennan, & D. Bannasch (Eds.), Advances in genetics: Aggression (vol 75, pp. 171–214). Boston, MA: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  41. Viding, E., Larsson, H., & Jones, A. P. (2008). Quantitative genetic studies of antisocial behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1503), 2519–2527. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence: Mutual influences and common risk factors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(3), 171–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitaro, F., Hartl, A. C., Brendgen, M., Laursen, B., Boivin, M., & Dionne, G. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on gambling and substance use in early adolescence. Behavior Genetics, 44(4), 347–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wanner, B., Vitaro, F., Carbonneau, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Cross-lagged links among gambling, substance use, and delinquency from midadolescence to young adulthood: Additive and moderating effects of common risk factors. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 91–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Patterns and characteristics of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(4), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Vitaro
    • 1
  • Amy C. Hartl
    • 2
  • Brett Laursen
    • 2
  • Mara Brendgen
    • 3
  • Ginette Dionne
    • 4
  • Michel Boivin
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Florida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  3. 3.University of QuebecMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Laval UniversityQuebec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations