Nonmonetary Decision-Making Indices Discriminate Between Different Behavioral Components of Gambling
Recent research has proposed that altered reward and punishment sensitivity, heightened impulsivity, and faulty dynamic decision-making are at the core of disordered gambling. However, each of these traits and cognitive aspects dimensionally vary in the normal population, such that the link between individual differences in these dimensions and gambling use can be ultimately informative to explain disordered gambling. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the contribution of such decision-making-related indices to gambling use parameters in a community sample of college students. Assessment included punishment and reward sensitivity (as measured by the shortened Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire), impulsivity (as measured by the UPPS-P model and a motor inhibition Go/No-go task), and dynamic decision-making [as measured by the probabilistic reversal learning task (PRLT)]. A structured interview was conducted to explore quantitative aspects of the participants gambling habits (gambling presence, gambling frequency, and average amount of money spent in gambling per unit of time). Our results showed the existence of a decision-making profile of gambling, as it naturally occurs in college students, in which sensation seeking is directly and specifically related to gambling presence (gambling, or not gambling at all), punishment sensitivity is inversely related to gambling frequency, and inflexibility in the PRLT specifically predicts the losses accrued because of gambling. These results are compatible with the idea that sensation seeking and punishment insensitivity could increase exposure to gambling activities, whereas reversal learning inflexibility, in people who already gamble, could boost the risk to accumulate losses.
KeywordsGambling Decision-making Impulsivity Reward and punishment sensitivity Reversal learning
- Aluja, A., & Blanch, A. (2011). Neuropsychological behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral approach system (BAS) assessment: A shortened sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire Version (SPSRQ–20). Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 628–636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eysenck, S. B., & Sybil, B. G. (1993). The I7: Development of a measure of impulsivity and its relationship to the superfactors of personality. In W. G. McCown, J. L. Johnson, & M. B. Shure (Eds.), The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 141–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynam, D. R., Smith, G. R., Whiteside, S. P., & Cyder, M. A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior. (Tech. Rep.). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.Google Scholar
- Moreno-López, L., Perales, J. C., Son, D., Albein-Urios, N., Soriano-Mas, C., Martinez-Gonzalez, J. M., et al. (2014). Cocaine use severity and cerebellar gray matter are associated with reversal learning deficits in cocaine-dependent individuals. Addiction Biology. doi:10.1111/adb.12143.
- Navas, J. F., Torres, A., Cándido, A., & Perales, J. C. (in press). ¿’Nothing’ or ‘just a bit’? ¿’Much’ or ‘too much’? Impulsivity traits as markers of severity transitions within non-problematic and problematic ranges of alcohol and Internet use. Adicciones. Google Scholar
- Perales, J. C., Verdejo-García, A., Moya, M., Lozano, O., & Perez-García, M. (2009). Bright and dark sides of impulsivity: Performance of women with high and low trait impulsivity on neuropsychological tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 927–944.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross, D., Sharp, C., Vuchinich, R., & Spurrett, D. (2008). Midbrain mutiny: The picoeconomics and neuroeconomics of disordered gambling. Economic theory and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Swainson, R., Rogers, R. D., Sahakian, B. J., Summers, B. A., Polkey, C. E., & Robbins, T. W. (2000). Probabilistic learning and reversal deficits in patients with Parkinson’s disease or frontal or temporal lobe lesions: Possible adverse effects of dopaminergic medication. Neuropsychologia, 38, 596–612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sztainert, T., Wohl, M. J., McManus, J. F., & Stead, J. D. (in press). On being attracted to the possibility of a win: Reward sensitivity (via gambling motives) undermines treatment seeking among pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9394-5.
- Torres, A., Catena, A., Megías, A., Maldonado, A., Cándido, A., Verdejo-García, A., et al. (2013b). Emotional and non-emotional pathways to impulsive behavior and addiction. Frontiers Human Neuroscience, 7, 43.Google Scholar
- Verdejo-García, A., López-Torrecillas, F., Aguilar de Arcos, F., & Pérez-García, M. (2005). Differential effects of MDMA, cocaine, and cannabis use severity on distinctive components of the executive functions in polysubstance users, a multiple regression analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 89–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar