Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1287–1295 | Cite as

Risk Gambling and Personality: Results from a Representative Swedish Sample

  • Kristina Sundqvist
  • Peter Wennberg
Original Paper


The association between personality and gambling has been explored previously. However, few studies are based on representative populations. This study aimed at examining the association between risk gambling and personality in a representative Swedish population. A random Swedish sample (N = 19,530) was screened for risk gambling using the Lie/Bet questionnaire. The study sample (N = 257) consisted of those screening positive on Lie/Bet and completing a postal questionnaire about gambling and personality (measured with the NODS–PERC and the HP5i respectively). Risk gambling was positively correlated with Negative Affectivity (a facet of Neuroticism) and Impulsivity (an inversely related facet of Conscientiousness), but all associations were weak. When taking age and gender into account, there were no differences in personality across game preference groups, though preferred game correlated with level of risk gambling. Risk gamblers scored lower than the population norm data with respect to Negative Affectivity, but risk gambling men scored higher on Impulsivity. The association between risk gambling and personality found in previous studies was corroborated in this study using a representative sample. We conclude that risk and problem gamblers should not be treated as a homogeneous group, and prevention and treatment interventions should be adapted according to differences in personality, preferred type of game and the risk potential of the games.


Gambling Risk gambling Problem gambling Gambling disorder Personality Big five 



The study was funded by Svenska Spel. We declare no conflict of interest. We are grateful for valuable comments on the manuscript by professor Jan Blomqvist.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Text (vol. Washington). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Journal of Psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013b). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). Google Scholar
  4. Bagby, R. M., Vachon, D. D., Bulmash, E. L., Toneatto, T., Quilty, L. C., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Pathological gambling and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 873–880. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97(5), 487–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boman, U., Engdahl, B., Gustafsson, N.-K., Hradilova Selin, K., & Ramstedt, M. (2006). Alkoholkonsumtionen i Sverige fram till år 2005. Stockholm. Retrieved from
  7. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–90. Retrieved from
  8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assesment Resourses, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Eysenck, H.-J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 16, pp. 244–276).Google Scholar
  10. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological bullentin, 116 (3), 429–456.Google Scholar
  11. Forbush, K. T., Shaw, M., Graeber, M. a, Hovick, L., Meyer, V. J., Moser, D. J., … Black, D. W. (2008). Neuropsychological characteristics and personality traits in pathological gambling. CNS Spectrums, 13(4), 306–15. Retrieved from
  12. Fortune, E. E., & Goodie, A. S. (2010). The relationship between pathological gambling and sensation seeking: the role of subscale scores. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 26, 331–346. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9162-8.Google Scholar
  13. Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 816–821. doi: 10.1037/a0032822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustavsson, J. P., Eriksson, A.-K., Hilding, A., Gunnarsson, M., & Ostensson, C.-G. (2008). Measurement invariance of personality traits from a five-factor model perspective: multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 459–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00654.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustavsson, J. P., Jönsson, E. G., Linder, J., & Weinryb, R. M. (2003). The HP5 inventory: definition and assessment of five health-relevant personality traits from a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Individual Differences,. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00142-3.Google Scholar
  16. Gustavsson, J. P., Weinryb, R. M., Göransson, S., Pedersen, N. L., & Åsberg, M. (1997). Stability and predictive ability of personality traits across 9 years. Personality and Individual Differences,. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00268-1.Google Scholar
  17. Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 25(1), 67–92. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9088-6.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, E. E., Hamer, R., Nora, R. M., Tan, B., Eisenstein, N., & Engelhart, C. (1997). The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychological Reports, 80, 83–88. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Maclaren, V. V., Fugelsang, J. A., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2011). The personality of pathological gamblers: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1057–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcus, B., & Schütz, A. (2005). Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 959–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00335.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McDaniel, S. R., & Zuckerman, M. (2003). The relationship of impulsive sensation seeking and gender to interest and participation in gambling activities. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1385–1400. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00357-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., Häfeli, J., & Mörsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 221–236. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2011.584890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 616–621. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myrseth, H., Pallesen, S., Molde, H., Johnsen, B. H., & Lorvik, I. M. (2009). Personality factors as predictors of pathological gambling. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 933–937. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2010). Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2008/2009. Östersund: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut.Google Scholar
  26. Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 250–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Walther, B., Morgenstern, M., & Hanewinkel, R. (2012). Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: Personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. European Addiction Research, 18(4), 167–174. doi: 10.1159/000335662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 323–335. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., & Teta, P. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 757–768. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations