Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 695–715

Gambling and Problem Gambling in the United States: Changes Between 1999 and 2013

  • John W. Welte
  • Grace M. Barnes
  • Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell
  • Joseph H. Hoffman
  • William F. Wieczorek
Original Paper

Abstract

Telephone surveys of US adults were conducted in 1999–2000 and again in 2011–2013. The same questions and methods were used so as to make the surveys comparable. There was a reduction in percentage of past-year gambling and in frequency of gambling. Rates of problem gambling remained stable. Lottery was included among the specific types of gambling for which past year participation and frequency of play declined. Internet gambling was the only form of gambling for which the past-year participation rate increased. The average win/loss increased for several forms of gambling, providing a modest indication that gamblers were betting more, albeit less frequently. Between the two surveys, the rates of past-year participation in gambling declined markedly for young adults. In both surveys, rates of problem gambling were higher for males than females, and this difference increased markedly between surveys as problem gambling rates increased for males and decreased for females. For the combined surveys, rates of problem gambling were highest for blacks and Hispanics and lowest for whites and Asians. In both surveys, the rates of problem gambling declined as socio-economic status became higher. Possible explanations for these trends are discussed.

Keywords

Problem gambling United States Gambling trends 

References

  1. Abbott, M., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2013). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: Changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9396-3. [Epub ahead of print].
  2. Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: Report on phase one of the national survey of problem gambling. Research Series No. 12. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Ronnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 237–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Cell Phone Task Force. (2010). Weighting in RDD cell phone surveys. In New considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD telephone surveys in the U.S. with respondents reached via cell phone numbers (pp. 61–76). Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  5. American Gaming Association. (2013). Gaming revenue: 10-year trend. http://www.americangaming.org.
  6. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2011). Gambling on the lottery: Sociodemographic correlates across the lifespan. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 575–586.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Tidwell, M.-C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2013). Effects of neighborhood disadvantage on problem gambling and alcohol abuse. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 82–89.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, D. W., McCormick, B., Losch, M. E., Shaw, M., Lutz, G., & Allen, J. (2012). Prevalence of problem gambling in Iowa: Revisiting Shaffer’s adaptation hypothesis. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 24(4), 279–284.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2012). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, JulyDecember 2011. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.
  11. Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 151–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bondolfi, G., Jemann, F., Ferrero, F., Zullino, D., & Osiek, C. H. (2008). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Switzerland after the opening of casinos and the introduction of new preventive legislation. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 117, 236–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bortz, D. (2013). Gambling addicts seduced by growing casino accessibility. U.S. News.com. March 28.Google Scholar
  14. Casino City Press. (2010). Gaming business directory. Newton, MA: Casino City Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gerstein, D. R., Volberg, R. A., Toce, M. T., Harwood, H., Christiansen, E. M., Hoffman, J., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, Il: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Horvath, C., & Paap, R. (2012). The effect of recessions on gambling expenditures. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(4), 703–717.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Horváth, C., & Paap, R. (2011). The effect of recessions on gambling expenditures. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9282-9.
  18. Jackson, A. C., Pennay, D., Dowling, N. A., Coles-Janess B., & Christensen, D. R. (2013). Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers. Journal of Gambling Studies. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  19. Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T., & Hybels, J. (1979). A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  20. Kennedy, C., & Kolenikov, S. (2012). Weighting approaches for dual frame RDD surveys. AAPOR webinar, recorded 10/11/2012, Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  21. Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., et al. (2008). DMS-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38, 1351–1360.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. LaPlante, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Understanding the influence of gambling opportunities: Expanding exposure models to include adaptation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(4), 616–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavrakas, P. J. (1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lohr, S. (2009). Multiple frame surveys. In D. Pfeffermann & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Vol. 29A, sample surveys: Design, methods and applications (pp. 71–88). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A Critical Review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Neal, P. N., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Victoria, Australia: Office of Gambling and Racing, Victorian Government Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  28. Outcalt, J. K. (2000). Nationwide cross reference directory of licensed gambling establishments. Gainesville, FL: Outcalt and Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(5), 564–574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Robins, L., Marcus, L., Reich, W., Cunningham, R., & Gallagher, T. (1996). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule—Version IV (DIS-IV). St. Louis: Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  31. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
  33. Skolink, S. (2011). High Stakes: The rising cost of America’s gambling addiction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? A meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stricker, L. J. (1988). Measuring social status with occupational information: A simple method. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(5), 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Volberg, R. A. (2002). The epidemiology of pathological gambling. Psychiatric Annals, 32(3), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Volberg, R. A. (2003). Has there been a “feminization” of gambling and problem gambling in the United States? The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues. eGambling, 8. http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue8/feature/index.html.
  38. Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California problem gambling prevalence survey. Submitted to California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling.Google Scholar
  39. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., Griffiths, M., Hussey, D., & Dobbie, F. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. Prepared for The Gambling Commission. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  40. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M., & Hoffman, J. H. (2008). The prevalence of problem gambling among U.S. adolescents and young adults: Results from a National Survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 119–133.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M., & Parker, J. (2001). Alcohol and gambling pathology among U.S. adults: Prevalence, demographic patterns and co-morbidity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(5), 706–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M., & Parker, J. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S.: Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M., & Parker, J. (2004a). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 323–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Welte, J. W., Wieczorek, W. F., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M., & Hoffman, J. H. (2004b). The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behavior and pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 405–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiebe, J., & Volberg, R. A. (2007). Problem gambling prevalence research: A critical overview. A report to the Canadian Gaming Association. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/hl/comm/communicationfile-34523.pdf.
  46. Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2010). Best practices in the population assessment of problem gambling. Guelph, Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3068.
  48. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph, Ontario: Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Welte
    • 1
  • Grace M. Barnes
    • 1
  • Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell
    • 1
  • Joseph H. Hoffman
    • 1
  • William F. Wieczorek
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute on Addictions, University at BuffaloState University of New YorkBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Center for Health and Social ResearchState University College of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations