Gambling and Problem Gambling in the United States: Changes Between 1999 and 2013
- 1.3k Downloads
Telephone surveys of US adults were conducted in 1999–2000 and again in 2011–2013. The same questions and methods were used so as to make the surveys comparable. There was a reduction in percentage of past-year gambling and in frequency of gambling. Rates of problem gambling remained stable. Lottery was included among the specific types of gambling for which past year participation and frequency of play declined. Internet gambling was the only form of gambling for which the past-year participation rate increased. The average win/loss increased for several forms of gambling, providing a modest indication that gamblers were betting more, albeit less frequently. Between the two surveys, the rates of past-year participation in gambling declined markedly for young adults. In both surveys, rates of problem gambling were higher for males than females, and this difference increased markedly between surveys as problem gambling rates increased for males and decreased for females. For the combined surveys, rates of problem gambling were highest for blacks and Hispanics and lowest for whites and Asians. In both surveys, the rates of problem gambling declined as socio-economic status became higher. Possible explanations for these trends are discussed.
KeywordsProblem gambling United States Gambling trends
This research was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grants AA11402 and AA018097, awarded to John W. Welte.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbott, M., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2013). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: Changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9396-3. [Epub ahead of print].
- Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: Report on phase one of the national survey of problem gambling. Research Series No. 12. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
- American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Cell Phone Task Force. (2010). Weighting in RDD cell phone surveys. In New considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD telephone surveys in the U.S. with respondents reached via cell phone numbers (pp. 61–76). Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
- American Gaming Association. (2013). Gaming revenue: 10-year trend. http://www.americangaming.org.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2012). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2011. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.
- Bortz, D. (2013). Gambling addicts seduced by growing casino accessibility. U.S. News.com. March 28.Google Scholar
- Casino City Press. (2010). Gaming business directory. Newton, MA: Casino City Press.Google Scholar
- Gerstein, D. R., Volberg, R. A., Toce, M. T., Harwood, H., Christiansen, E. M., Hoffman, J., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, Il: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Horváth, C., & Paap, R. (2011). The effect of recessions on gambling expenditures. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9282-9.
- Jackson, A. C., Pennay, D., Dowling, N. A., Coles-Janess B., & Christensen, D. R. (2013). Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers. Journal of Gambling Studies. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- Kallick, M., Suits, D., Dielman, T., & Hybels, J. (1979). A survey of American gambling attitudes and behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, C., & Kolenikov, S. (2012). Weighting approaches for dual frame RDD surveys. AAPOR webinar, recorded 10/11/2012, Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
- Lavrakas, P. J. (1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A Critical Review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Neal, P. N., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Victoria, Australia: Office of Gambling and Racing, Victorian Government Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Outcalt, J. K. (2000). Nationwide cross reference directory of licensed gambling establishments. Gainesville, FL: Outcalt and Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Robins, L., Marcus, L., Reich, W., Cunningham, R., & Gallagher, T. (1996). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule—Version IV (DIS-IV). St. Louis: Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
- Skolink, S. (2011). High Stakes: The rising cost of America’s gambling addiction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. A. (2003). Has there been a “feminization” of gambling and problem gambling in the United States? The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues. eGambling, 8. http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue8/feature/index.html.
- Volberg, R. A., Nysse-Carris, K. L., & Gerstein, D. R. (2006). 2006 California problem gambling prevalence survey. Submitted to California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling.Google Scholar
- Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., Griffiths, M., Hussey, D., & Dobbie, F. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. Prepared for The Gambling Commission. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Wiebe, J., & Volberg, R. A. (2007). Problem gambling prevalence research: A critical overview. A report to the Canadian Gaming Association. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/hl/comm/communicationfile-34523.pdf.
- Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2010). Best practices in the population assessment of problem gambling. Guelph, Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3068.
- Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2009). Internet gambling prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph, Ontario: Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar