Gambling Motives: Application of the Reasons for Gambling Questionnaire in an Australian Population Survey
- 1.1k Downloads
The Reasons for Gambling Questionnaire (RGQ) consist of 15 items forming five factors: enhancement, social, money, recreation and coping. The RGQ was developed for use in the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey (BGPS) and has now been employed in the second Social and Economic Impact Study (SEIS) of Gambling in Tasmania study conducted in 2011 in Australia. Given differences between Britain and Australia in terms of socio-demographic profiles, gambling cultures and attitudes, gambling access and availability, gambling regulation, and rates and patterns of gambling participation, the aims of this study were to analyse the RGQ data from the SEIS to: (1) determine the most commonly endorsed gambling motives in an Australian jurisdiction, (2) explore the factor structure of the RGQ in an Australian sample, and (3) explore how motives for gambling vary among different Australian population sub-groups. A representative sample of the Tasmanian population who had gambled in the previous 12 months (n = 2,796) were administered the RGQ via computer-assisted telephone interviewing. The five most commonly endorsed reasons for gambling were for fun (62 %), followed by the chance of winning big money (52 %), it being something to do with friends and family (48 %), to be sociable (40 %), and excitement (38 %). A principal component analysis revealed a five-factor structure that is slightly different from that derived in the BGPS: money, regulate internal state, positive feelings, social, and challenge reasons. Finally, gambling motives varied according to socio-demographic factors, number of gambling activities, problem gambling severity, and participation on different gambling activities. Although some of these findings are consistent with those from the BGPS, there are also some slight differences, suggesting that there may be regional-specific variations in gambling motives.
KeywordsProblem gambling Pathological gambling Gambling Motives Measurement Reasons for Gambling Questionnaire
The second Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania was funded by the Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance (Project IGFP 2010 01).
- Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses: Encyclopedia for research methods for the social sciences (pp. 792–795). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Allen Consulting Group, Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre, and the Social Research Centre. (2011a). Social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania, Volume 1: Gambling industry trends and economic impacts. Prepared for the Tasmanian Government Department of Treasury and Finance http://www.treasury.tas.gov.au/domino/dtf/dtf.nsf/LookupFiles/Volume1secondgamblingSEIS.PDF/$file/Volume1secondgamblingSEIS.PDF.
- Allen Consulting Group, Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre, and the Social Research Centre. (2011b). Social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania, Volume 2: Gambling survey. Prepared for the Tasmanian Government Department of Treasury and Finance: http://www.tenders.tas.gov.au/domino/dtf/dtf.nsf/LookupFiles/Volume2secondgamblingSEIS.PDF/$file/Volume2secondgamblingSEIS.PDF.
- Allen Consulting Group, Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre, and the Social Research Centre. (2011c). Social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania, Volume 3: Assessment of harm minimisation measures. Prepared for the Tasmanian Government Department of Treasury and Finance: http://www.treasury.tas.gov.au/domino/dtf/dtf.nsf/LookupFiles/Volume3secondgamblingSEIS.PDF/$file/Volume3secondgamblingSEIS.PDF.
- Central Intelligence Agency (2013) .Guide to Country Comparison. In: The world factbook 2013–14. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/rankorderguide.html.
- Chantal, Y., Vallerand, R. J., & Vallieres, E. F. (1994). Construction et validation l’echelle de motivation relative aux jeux de hasard et d’argent. On the development and validation of the Gambling Motivation Scale (GMS). Society and Leisure, 17, 189–212.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, J., Doll, H., Hawton, K., Dutton, W. H., Geddes, J. R., Goodwin, G. M., et al. (2010). How psychological symptoms relate to different motivations for gambling: An online study of internet gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 68(8), 733–740. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyse your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
- McMillen, J., Marshall, D., Wenzel, M., & Ahmed, A. (2004). Validation of the Victorian gambling screen. Melbourne, Victoria: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- Mond, J., Davidson, T., & McAllister, I. (2011). ANU Poll 2011: Public opinion on Gambling (computer file). Canberra: Australian Data Archive, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
- Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: A national definition. Adelaide: South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
- Stewart, S.H. (2013). Short-term outcome of a motive-matched treatment for coping and enhancement gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at Alberta Gambling Research Institute’s 12th Annual Conference on Gambling Research, “Research to Practice in Gambling Disorders”, Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
- Stewart, S. H., Zack, M., Collins, P., & Klein, R. M. (2008). Sub typing pathological gamblers on the basis of affective motivations for gambling: Relations to gambling problems, drinking problems, and affective motivations for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours, 22(2), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suhr, D. D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? (pp. 200–231). Cary: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Wardle, H., Dobbie, F., Kerr, J., & Reith, G. (2009). Questionnaire development for a longitudinal study of gamblers. Phase 1: Gambling commission. http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/Questionnairedevelopmentforalongitudinalstudyofgamblers-phase1-June2009.pdf.
- Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., & Jotangia, D. et al. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey 2010 London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Watkins, M. (2008). Monte Carlo PCA for Parallel Analysis 2.3 http://www.softpedia.com/get/Others/Home-Education/Monte-Carlo-PCA-for-Parallel-Analysis.shtml.