Setting Win Limits: An Alternative Approach to “Responsible Gambling”?
- 609 Downloads
Social scientists, governments, and the casino industry have all emphasized the need for casino patrons to “gamble responsibly.” Strategies for responsible gambling include self-imposed time limits and loss limits on gambling. Such strategies help prevent people from losing more than they can afford and may help prevent excessive gambling behavior. Yet, loss limits also make it more likely that casino patrons leave when they are losing. Oddly, the literature makes no mention of “win limits” as a potential approach to responsible gambling. A win limit would be similar to a loss limit, except the gambler would leave the casino upon reaching a pre-set level of winnings. We anticipate that a self-imposed win limit will reduce the gambler’s average loss and, by default, also reduce the casino’s profit. We test the effect of a self-imposed win limit by running slot machine simulations in which the treatment group of players has self-imposed and self-enforced win and loss limits, while the control group has a self-imposed loss limit or no limit. We find that the results conform to our expectations: the win limit results in improved player performance and reduced casino profits. Additional research is needed, however, to determine whether win limits could be a useful component of a responsible gambling strategy.
KeywordsResponsible gambling Loss limits Win limits Mental accounting
We are grateful to Jeffrey Derevensky, Ph.D. for helpful comments and suggestions.
- American Gaming Association. (2008). Responsible gaming statutes and regulations (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Blaszczynski, A., Gainsbury, S., & Karlov, L. (2013). Blue Gum gaming machine: An evaluation of responsible gambling features. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9378-5.
- Broda, A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., Bosworth, L. B., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Virtual harm reduction efforts for internet gambling: Effects of deposit limits on actual internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 27–36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corporate Research Associates. (2006). Video lottery program changes Nova Scotia: Impact analysis. Retrieved from http://www.gamingns.ca/images/uploads/VLTimpactanalysisreport.pdf.
- Derevensky, J. L., Gupta, R., Dickson, L., & Deguire, A.-E. (2004). Prevention efforts toward reducing gambling problems. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth (pp. 211–230). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hannum, R. C., & Cabot, A. N. (2005). Practical casino math (2nd ed.). Las Vegas, NV: Trace Publications.Google Scholar
- Maremont, M., & Berzon, A. (2013, October 11). How often do gamblers really win? New data provides some answers on the real odds for gambling, Wall Street Journal (online, wsj.com).Google Scholar
- Petry, N. M., Blanco, C., Auriacombe, M., Borges, G., Bucholz, K., Crowley, T. J., et al. (2013). An overview of an rationale for changes proposed for pathological gambling in DSM-5. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9370-0.
- Responsible Gambling Trust. (2013). Corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from: http://www.responsiblegamblingtrust.org.uk/corporatesocialresponsibility.html.
- Schneider, M. E. (2004). The everything casino gambling book: Feel confident, have fun, and win big! (2nd ed.). Avon, MA: Adams Media.Google Scholar
- Schottler Consutling. (2010). Major findings and implications: Player tracking and pre-commitment trial: A program and outcome evaluation of the PlaySmart precommitment system. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.sa.gov.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0016/2158/PlaySmart.pdf.
- Shaffer, H., Martin, R., Kleschinsky, J., & Neporent, L. (2012). Change your gambling, change your life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- St-Pierre, R. A., Walker, D. M., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (in press). How availability and accessibility of gambling venues influence problem gambling: A review of the literature. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 18(1) (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Wohl, M. J. A., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 703–717. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9340-y.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood, R. T. A., Shorter, G. W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Rating the suitability of responsible gambling features for specific game types: A resource for optimizing responsible gambling strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12, 94–112. doi: 10.1007/s11469-013-9473-y.