Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 787–806 | Cite as

An Examination of a Proposed DSM-IV Pathological Gambling Hierarchy in a Treatment Seeking Population: Similarities with Substance Dependence and Evidence for Three Classification Systems

  • Darren R. Christensen
  • Alun C. Jackson
  • Nicki A. Dowling
  • Rachel A. Volberg
  • Shane A. Thomas
Original Paper

Abstract

Toce-Gerstein et al. (Addiction 98:1661–1672, 2003) investigated the distribution of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) pathological gambling criteria endorsement in a U.S. community sample for those people endorsing a least one of the DSM-IV criteria (n = 399). They proposed a hierarchy of gambling disorders where endorsement of 1–2 criteria were deemed ‘At-Risk’, 3–4 ‘Problem gamblers’, 5–7 ‘Low Pathological’, and 8–10 ‘High Pathological’ gamblers. This article examines these claims in a larger Australian treatment seeking population. Data from 4,349 clients attending specialist problem gambling services were assessed for meeting the ten DSM-IV pathological gambling criteria. Results found higher overall criteria endorsement frequencies, three components, a direct relationship between criteria endorsement and gambling severity, clustering of criteria similar to the Toce-Gerstein et al. taxonomy, high accuracy scores for numerical and criteria specific taxonomies, and also high accuracy scores for dichotomous pathological gambling diagnoses. These results suggest significant complexities in the frequencies of criteria reports and relationships between criteria.

Keywords

DSM-IV DSM-V Pathological gambling Disordered gambling Substance related and addictive disorders Behavioral addiction Classification systems Taxonomy Severity 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th text revision ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D’Annucci, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 334–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Ruiter, M. B., Veltman, D. J., Goudriann, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Sjoerds, Z., & van den Brink, W. (2009). Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34, 1027–1038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, L., & Delfrabbro, P. (2005). Motivators for change and barriers to help-seeking in Australian problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 133–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Faregh, N., & Derevensky, J. (2011). A comparative latent class analysis of endorsement profiles of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for problem gambling among adolescents from a community and a treatment sample. Addiction Research & Theory, 119, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  10. Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & van den Brink, W. (2006). Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: A comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction, 101, 534–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodgins, D. C. (2004). Using the NORC DSM Screen for gambling problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: Psychometric evaluation. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1685–1690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., Holt, T. A., & Thomason, N. (2005). Change and continuity in a help-seeking gambling population: A five-year record. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kushner, M. G., Abrams, K., Donahue, C., Thuras, P., Frost, R., & Kim, S. W. (2007). Urge to gamble in problem gamblers exposed to a casino environment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 121–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladouceur, R., Silvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (1998). Understanding and treating the pathological gambler. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Lesieur, H. R. (2006). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A rebuttal to critics. Journal of Gambling Issues, 17, 1–16.Google Scholar
  16. Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106, 490–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McCormick, J. E. (2009). Individual vulnerability and dissociative-like experiences in regular and problem gamblers. (Master of Psychology (Clinical) and Doctor of Philosophy), University of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  18. Neal, P., Delfrabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Melbourne: Office of Gaming and Racing on behalf of Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Orford, J., Wardle, H., Griffiths, M., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2010). PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: Reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement. International Gambling Studies, 10, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petry, N. M. (2003). Moving beyond a dichotomous classification for gambling disorders. Addiction, 98, 1673–1679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Petry, N. M., Blanco, C., Stinchfield, R., & Volberg, R. A. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the proposed changes for gambling diagnosis in the DSM-5. Addiction, 108, 575–581.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: An overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences, 363, 3183–3189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Canberra: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Shaffer, H. J., & Martin, R. (2011). Disordered gambling: Etiology, trajectory, and clinical considerations. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 483–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Slutske, W. S., Eisen, S. A., True, W. R., Lyons, M. J., Goldberg, J., & Tsuang, M. T. (2003). Common genetic vulnerability for pathological gambling and alcohol dependence in men. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 666–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2005). DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 73–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Strong, D. R., & Kahler, C. W. (2007). Evaluation of the continuum of gambling problems using the DSM-IV. Addiction, 102, 713–721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas, A. C., Sullivan, G. B., & Allen, F. C. L. (2009). A theoretical model of EGM problem gambling: More than a cognitive escape. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Toce-Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2003). A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction, 98, 1661–1672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Volberg, R. A., Munck, I. M., & Petry, N. M. (2011). A quick and simple screening method for pathological and problem gamblers in addiction programs and practices. American Journal on Addictions, 20, 220–227.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker, M., & Shannon, K. (2006). Gender differences in meeting the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling. Gambling Research, 18, 33–41.Google Scholar
  32. Welte, J., Barnes, G., Wieczorek, W., Tidwell, M. C., & Parker, J. (2001). Alcohol and gambling pathology among U.S. adults. Prevalence, demographic patterns and comorbidity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 62, 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Winter, I. (2000). Towards a theorised understanding of family life and social capital (Vol. 21). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren R. Christensen
    • 1
    • 6
  • Alun C. Jackson
    • 1
  • Nicki A. Dowling
    • 4
    • 1
    • 5
  • Rachel A. Volberg
    • 2
  • Shane A. Thomas
    • 3
  1. 1.Problem Gambling Research and Treatment CentreUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Gemini ResearchNorthamptonUSA
  3. 3.Problem Gambling Research and Treatment CentreMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.School of Psychological SciencesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations