Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 471–482 | Cite as

Just Like the Lottery? Player Behaviour and Anomalies in the Market for Football Pools

Original Paper

Abstract

Football pools were an antecedent to lotto in providing a long-odds, high-prize gambling opportunity for a mass market in Europe. Even after lotto has become well established, pools games continue to occupy a significant niche in the gaming market in several jurisdictions, most notably Spain. This paper employs 23 years of sales data from the national pools game in Spain to investigate similarities between the behaviour of lotto players and pools players. It observes similar phenomena as have been noted in lotto sales studies, including strong sensitivity of sales to the size of jackpot on offer, significant habit effects, a halo effect whereby there is some short-term persistence in increased sales whenever a high jackpot is offered (even after jackpot size has returned to normal), and a tendency to jackpot fatigue (over time, the size of the jackpot has to be increased to more than before to stimulate the same increase in sales). Notwithstanding that the football pools are marketed as based on knowledge and understanding of sport whereas lotto is a pure numbers game, modelling sales of the pools therefore yields findings very similar to those reported in the literature on lotto. This suggests that both sets of players share common psychological and cognitive traits and economic motivation. Those responsible for promoting pools should therefore be able to draw on findings from the much more extensive literature on lotto when formulating strategy in terms of game design and marketing.

Keywords

Football pools Jackpot Addiction Conscious selection Halo effect Prize fatigue Lotto fever 

References

  1. Baker, R., & McHale, I. (2011). Investigating the behavioural characteristics of lottery players using a combination preference model for conscious selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 174(4), 1071–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G., & Murphy, K. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beenstock, M., & Haitovsky, Y. (2001). Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(6), 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farrell, L., Hartley, R., Lanot, G., & Walker, I. (2000). The demand for lotto: The role of conscious selection. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 18(2), 228–241.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, L., Morgenroth, E., & Walker, I. (1999). A time series analysis of UK lottery sales: Long and short run price elasticities. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farrell, L., & Walker, I. (1999). The welfare effects of lotto: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Public Economics, 72(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forrest, D., & Pérez, L. (2011). Football pools and lotteries: Substitute roads to riches? Applied Economic Letters, 18(13), 1253–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forrest, D. & Pérez, L. (2013). The Football Pools. In L. Vaughan Williams (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Gambling (in press). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Forrest, D., Simmons, R., & Chesters, N. (2002). Buying a dream: Alternative models of demand for lotto. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 485–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García, J., Perez, L., & Rodríguez, P. (2008). Football pools sales: How important is a football club in the top divisions? International Journal of Sports Finance, 3, 119–126.Google Scholar
  11. García, J., & Rodríguez, P. (2007). The demand for Football Pools in Spain: The role of price, prizes, and the composition of the coupon. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(4), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grote, K., & Matheson, V. (2007). Examining the ‘halo effect’ in lotto games. Applied Economics Letters, 14(4), 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gulley, O., & Scott, F. (1993). The demand for wagering on state-operated lotto games. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
  14. Hauser-Rethaller, U., & Köning, U. (2002). Parimutuel lotteries: Gamblers’ behavior and the demand for tickets. German Economic Review, 3(2), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matheson, V., & Grote, K. (2004). Lotto fever: do lottery players act rationally around large jackpots? Economics Letters, 83(2), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matheson, V., & Grote, K. (2005). Rationality and efficiency in lotto games. In L. Vaughan Williams (Ed.), Information efficiency in financial and betting markets (pp. 313–329). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pujol, F. (2009). Football betting as a cyclical learning process. Working Paper 05/09. Department of Economics, University of Navarra, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. Walker, I. (1998). The economic analysis of lotteries. Economic Policy, 13(27), 359–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Salford Business SchoolUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Facultad de Comercio, Turismo y Ciencias Sociales Jovellanos, Laboral-Ciudad de la CulturaUniversity of OviedoGijónSpain

Personalised recommendations