Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 197–210 | Cite as

Impulsivity, Gambling Cognitions, and the Gambler’s Fallacy in University Students

  • Harvey H. C. Marmurek
  • Jessica Switzer
  • Joshua D’Alvise
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study explored the associations among impulsivity, gambling cognitions, and behavioral adherence to the gambler’s fallacy in university students (N = 142). Both impulsivity and gambling cognitions were significant predictors of non-problem and problem gambler categories as defined the Problem Gambling Severity Index. A logistic regression analysis showed that the independent contribution of cognition was statistically significant but that the contribution of impulsivity was not. A behavioral measure of gambling was obtained by asking participants to play an online game of roulette for a maximum of 15 min. Only outside bets were permitted whereby participants were to bet on the color of the winning number. Adherence to the gambler’s fallacy was indexed by the likelihood of betting on an alternation in the color of the winning number as the number of consecutive outcomes of the other color increased. Gambling cognitions and gender, but not impulsivity, were associated with adherence to the gambler’s fallacy. Tracing the sources of specific influences on gambling behavior may benefit from a framework that distinguishes between “hot” (emotional) and “cold” (non-emotional) mechanisms that promote problem gambling.

Keywords

Gambling severity Impulsivity Gambling cognitions Gambler’s fallacy Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by The Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2010). Demographic and social variables associated with problem gambling among men and women in Canada. Psychiatry Research, 178, 395–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Tidwell, M. C. (2010). Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and noncollege young people in the United States. Journal of American College Health, 58, 443–452.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blinn-Pike, L., Worthy, S. L., & Jonkman, J. N. (2007). Disordered gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 175–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 205–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., El-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101, 570–580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Emond, M. S., & Marmurek, H. H. C. (2010). Gambling related cognitions mediate the association between thinking style and problem gambling severity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 257–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  10. Floyd, K., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2006). Use of warning messages to modify gambling beliefs and behavior in a laboratory investigation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hahn, U., & Warren, P. A. (2009). Perceptions of randomness: Why three heads are better than four. Psychological Review, 116, 454–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534–539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Holtgraves, T. (2009). Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 105–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, A. C., Wynne, H., Dowling, N. A., Tomnay, J. E., & Thomas, S. A. (2010). Using the CPGI to determine problem gambling prevalence in Australia: Measurement issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 570–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., et al. (2008). The prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ko, C., Yen, J., Chen, C., Chen, S., & Yen, C. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 4, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambos, C., & Delfabbro, P. (2007). Numerical reasoning ability and irrational beliefs in problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 7, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2006). Men and women playing games: Gender and the gambling preferences of Iowa gambling treatment program participants. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 65–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lund, I. (2011). Irrational beliefs revisited: Exploring the role of gambling preferences in the development of misconceptions in gamblers. Addiction Research and Theory, 19, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacLaren, V. V., Fugelsang, J. A., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2011). The personality of pathological gamblers: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1057–1067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6, 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michalczuk, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Clark, L. (2011). Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: A preliminary report. Psychological Medicine, 41, 2625–2635.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Monaghan, S., & Blaszcyzynski, A. (2010). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 67–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 561–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Odlaug, B. L., Schreiber, L. R. N., & Grant, J. E. (2013). Personality dimensions and disorders in pathological gambling. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26, 107–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Olivola, C. Y., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Randomness in retrospect: Exploring the interactions between memory and randomness cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 991–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orford, J. F., Griffiths, M. D., & Wardle, H. (2013). What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. International Gambling Studies, 13, 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oskarsson, A. T., Van Boven, L., McClelland, G., & Hastie, T. (2009). What’s next? Judging sequences of binary events. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 262–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Raylu, N., & Oie, T. P. S. (2004). The Gambling-Related Cognition Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99, 757–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 124–132.Google Scholar
  32. Sundali, J., & Croson, R. (2006). Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
  33. Torres, A., Catena, A., Megías, A, Maldonado, A., Cándido, A., Verdejo-García, A., et al. (2013). Emotional and non-emotional pathways to impulsive behavior and addiction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(43), 1–11.Google Scholar
  34. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London, UK: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  35. Wenzel, H. G., & Dahl, A. A. (2009). Female pathological gamblers—A critical review of the clinical findings. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams, R. J., & Connolly, D. (2006). Does learning about the mathematics of gambling change gambling behavior? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 62–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). The proportion of Ontario gambling revenue derived from problem gamblers. Canadian Public Policy, 33, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey H. C. Marmurek
    • 1
  • Jessica Switzer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joshua D’Alvise
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of Marketing and Consumer StudiesUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations