Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 859–878 | Cite as

Misestimating Betting Behavior: The Role of Negative Asymmetries in Emotional Self Prediction

  • Eduardo B. Andrade
  • Danny P. Claro
  • Gazi Islam
Original Paper


This paper addresses the role of negative asymmetries in emotional self-prediction by looking at the extent to which individuals misestimate their own betting behavior in sequential gambles. In a series of three experimental studies, we demonstrate that losses lead to higher than planned bets whereas bets are on average carried over after gains. Such asymmetric deviations from the plan emerge (1) when monetary and non-monetary incentives are used, and (2) when participants face fair and unfair gambles. The asymmetry is based on people’s inability to predict how much the negative emotions generated by a bad experience (e.g. the loss) will influence them to put more effort (e.g. bet more) than planned in an attempt to re-establish a homeostatic state in the prospect of a good experience (e.g. winning).


Affect Decision making Risk taking Emotional self-prediction 



The authors thank Caroline Wang, Danielle Rosini, Leonidas Sandoval, Gabriel Sanchez, Leandro Sumita, Maria Beatriz Moraes for their assistance with data collection.


  1. Allsop, S., & Saunders, B. (1989). Relapse and alcohol problems. In M. Gossop (Ed.), Relapse and addictive behaviour. (pp. 11–40). New York: Tavistokc/Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. American Gaming Association. (2007). State of the states: The AGA survey of casino entertainment. Washington: AGA.Google Scholar
  3. Andrade, E. B., & Iyer, G. (2009). Planned versus actual betting in sequential gambles. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade, E. B., & Van Boven, L. (2010). Feelings not foregone: Underestimating affective reactions to what does not happen. Psychological Science, 21(5), 706–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badger, G. J., Bickel, W. K., Giordano, L. A., Jacobs, E. A., Loewenstein, G., & Marsch, L. (2007). Altered states: The impact of immediate craving on the valuation of current and future opioids. Journal of Health Economics, 26, 865–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkan, R., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2003). Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkan, R., Danzinger, S., Ben-Bashat, G., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2005). Framing reference points: The effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister, Roy. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(March), 670–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerer, C. (2005). Three cheers—psychological, theoretical, empirical—for loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, XLII, 129–133.Google Scholar
  10. Cryder, C. E., Lerner, J. S., Gross, J. J., & Dahl, R. E. (2008). Misery is not miserly: Sad and self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological Science, 19, 525–530.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickerson, M., & Adcock, S. (1987). Mood, arousal and cognition in persistent gambling: Preliminary investigation of a theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 3, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickerson, M., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., Fabre, J., & Cunningham, R. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling behaviour. I. High-frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert, D. T., Gill, M. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The future is now: Temporal correction in affective forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grewal, D., Iyer, G. R., Gotlieb, J., & Levy, M. (2007). Developing a deeper understanding of post-purchase perceived risk and behavioral intentions in a service setting. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haws, K., Bearden, W., & Nenkov, G. (2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, H. L., & Coleman, A. M. (2009). Ambiguity aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Psychology, forthcoming, 30(3), 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loewenstein, G. (1999). A visceral account of addiction. In J. Elster & O. J. Skog (Eds.), Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction (pp. 235–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. The Economic Journal, 105, 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., & Shatto, C. (1996). Hot/cold intrapersonal empathy gaps and the prediction of curiosity. Working Paper: Carnegie-Mellon.Google Scholar
  23. Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? predicting future behavior. In D. Kahneman, E. D. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Russell.Google Scholar
  24. Nisbett, R. E., & Kanouse, D. E. (1968). Obesity, hunger, and supermarket shopping behavior. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 3, 683–684.Google Scholar
  25. Nomikos, M. S., Opton, E. Jr., & Averill, J. R. (1968). Surprise versus suspense in the production of stress reaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(2), 204–208.Google Scholar
  26. Perfetto, R., & Woodside, A. G. (2009). Extremely frequent behavior in consumer research: Theory and empirical evidence for chronic casino gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(3), 297–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pope, R. (1983). The pre-outcome period and the utility of gambling. In B. P. Stigum & F. Wenstøp (Eds.), Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications (pp. 137–177). Dordrecht : Reidel.Google Scholar
  28. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgment of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shu, L., Kun, Z., Yue, S., Li-Lin, R., Rui, Z., & Zhu-Yuan, L. (2010). Anticipated regret, risk perception, or both: Which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble? Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals’ loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(13), 5035–5040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thaler, R. H., Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, D. L. (1992). The winner’s curse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Van Boven, L., & Kane, J. (2006). Predicting feelings versus choices. In E. C. Chang & L. J. Sanna (Eds.), Judgment over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 67–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient visceral feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159–1168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., & Dunning, D. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Boven, L., White, K., & Huber, M. (2009). Immediacy bias in emotion perception: Current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wardle, J., & Beales, S. (1988). Control and loss of control over eating: An experimental investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 35–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wulfert, E., Roland, B. D., Hartley, J., Wang, N., & Franco, C. (2005). Heart rate, arousal, and excitement in gambling: Winners versus losers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 311–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yen, H., & Chuang, S.-C. (2008). The effect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 522–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo B. Andrade
    • 1
  • Danny P. Claro
    • 3
  • Gazi Islam
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Brazilian School of Public and Business AdministrationFGVRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Insper Education and Research InstituteSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations