Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 985–999 | Cite as

Gambling and Problem Gambling in Sweden: Changes Between 1998 and 2009

  • Max W. Abbott
  • Ulla Romild
  • Rachel A. Volberg
Original Paper


Gambling participation and rates of problem gambling change over time in response to a variety of factors including gambling availability, demographic changes and adaptation at individual and societal levels. These relationship are complex and only partially understood. The major aim of the present study was to provide general population estimates of gambling participation and problem gambling for Sweden and compare these estimates with estimates from a previous national study. The study was also designed to identify risk factors for problem gambling including change in these factors over time. Data are from the first phase of the Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study (Swelogs) in which a representative sample of 8,165 people was assessed using validated problem gambling and other measures to facilitate comparison with findings from the 1997/1998 Swedish Gambling Study (Swegs). Overall, it was found that gambling participation reduced markedly, although in some population sectors increases were evident for some forms including poker and electronic gaming machines. Lifetime prevalence of probable pathological gambling increased; however, past 12 months probable pathological and problem gambling prevalence did not. Males, younger adults and people born outside Sweden were at high risk in both studies. Significant prevalence increases were evident for people aged 18–24 and those with low levels of education. The results indicate that relationships between gambling exposure, participation and problems are dynamic with shifting implications for public health and social policy.


Problem gambling Prevalence Risk factors Epidemiology 



The research reported here was funded and administered by the Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Data collection for the survey was carried out by Statistics Sweden. The authors wish to thank Marie Risbeck of SNIPH, the members of the SNIPH Reference Group and the members of the Swelogs Advisory Group for their hard work in making the Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study a reality.

Conflict of interest



  1. Abbott, M. W. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research, 18(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. W. (2007). Situational factors that affect gambling behavior. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 251–278). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: Report on phase one of the national survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2000). Taking the pulse on gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: Phase one of the 1999 National Prevalence Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., Bellringer, M., & Reith, G. (2004a). A review of research on aspects of problem gambling. London: Responsibility in Gambling Trust.Google Scholar
  7. Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Rönnberg, S. (2004b). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 237–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commission, Productivity. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
  9. Commission, Productivity. (2010). Gambling. Canberra: Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  11. Gaming Board of Sweden. (2011). Expenditure on lotteries and gambling compared to disposable income. Strängnäs: Gaming Board of Sweden.Google Scholar
  12. Jonsson, J. (2012). Internet poker in Sweden in 2007. In R. J. Williams, R. T. Wood, & J. Parke (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of internet gambling (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. T., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Orford, J. (2005). Complicity on the river bank: The search for truth about problem gambling: Reply to the commentaries. Addiction, 100, 1235–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2002). The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): A review of recent research. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 26(2), 272–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rönnberg, S., Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Moore, W. L., Andren, A., Munck, I. M., et al. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden. Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
  17. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., & LaPlante, D. (2004). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 40–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stevens, M., & Young, M. (2010). Who plays what? Participation profiles in chance versus skill-based gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 89–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? A meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Svensson, J., Romild, U., Nordenmark, M., & Mansdotter, A. (2011). Gendered gambling domains and changes in Sweden. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Volberg, R. A. (2004). Fifteen years of problem gambling research: What do we know? Where do we go?. Issues: Journal of Gambling. 10.Google Scholar
  22. Volberg, R. A., Abbott, M. W., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. M. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104(4), 250–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max W. Abbott
    • 1
  • Ulla Romild
    • 2
  • Rachel A. Volberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Health and Environmental SciencesAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Swedish National Institute of Public HealthÖstersundSweden
  3. 3.Gemini Research, Ltd.NorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations