Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 729–736 | Cite as

The Determinants of Lottery Sales in Portugal

  • Maria João Kaizeler
  • Horácio C. Faustino
  • Rafael Marques
Original Paper

Abstract

In sum, this paper examines the core determinants of lottery sales in Portugal. With panel data analysis covering 18 Portuguese districts and 5 years, this study explains the variations in a district’s per-capita lottery sales in terms of key theoretical hypotheses such as per capita district income, age, education index, gender and religion. This paper concludes that the richer Portuguese districts spend more than the poorer districts and there is an inverted-U relationship between lottery sales and per capita income. The paper also concludes that married Catholic citizens spend more on lottery products than others and that the level of education returns a negative effect on lottery spending.

Keywords

Gambling Lotteries Religiosity Level of education Gender Age Income Portugal 

References

  1. Abbott, M. W. & Volberg, R. A. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling in the community: An international overview and critique. Report number one of the New Zealand gaming survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs. Available at: http://www.austgamingcouncil.org.au/images/pdf/eLibrary/954.pdf.
  2. Blalock, G., Just, D., & Simon, D. (2007). Hitting the jackpot or hitting the skids: Entertainment, poverty, and the demand for state lotteries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(3), 545–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brenner, R., & Brenner, G. (1990). Gambling and speculation: A theory, a history, and a future of some human decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clotfelter, C. T. & Cook, P. J. (1989). The demand for lottery products, NBER Working Paper 2928.Google Scholar
  5. Cosgrave, J. (Ed.). (2006). The sociology of risk and gambling reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M., & Savage, L. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56(4), 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giacopassi, D., Nichols, M., & Stitt, B. (2006). Voting for a lottery. Public Finance Review, 34(1), 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths, M. D., & Wood, R. T. A. (1999). Lottery gambling and addiction: An overview of European research. Report compiled for the Association of European National Lotteries (AELLE), Lausanne, Switzerland. Nottingham Trent University Psychology Division. www.europeanlotteries.org.
  9. Kaizeler, M., & Faustino, H. (2010). Demand for lottery products: An international study. Revista de Economia e Administração, 9(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaizeler, M., & Faustino, H. (2011). Is the lottery product an inferior good in higher income countries? International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(4), 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kearney, M. (2005). The economic winners and losers of legalized gambling. National Tax Journal, 58(2), 281–302.Google Scholar
  12. Lambert, W., Triandis, L., & Wolf, M. (1959). Some correlates of beliefs in the malevolence and benevolence of supernatural beings: A cross-societal study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Roberts, J., Arth, M., & Bush, R. (1959). Games in culture. American Anthropologist, 61(4), 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rubenstein, R., & Scafidi, B. (2002). Who pays and who benefits? Examining the distributional consequences of the Georgia lottery for education. National Tax Journal, 55(2), 223–238.Google Scholar
  15. Scott, F., & Garen, J. (1994). Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria João Kaizeler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Horácio C. Faustino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rafael Marques
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.SOCIUS—Research Centre in Economic and Organizational SociologyLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão (ISEG)Technical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations