Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 669–683 | Cite as

Predictors of Return Rate Discrimination in Slot Machine Play

Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which accurate estimates of payback percentages and volatility combined with prior learning, enabled players to successfully discriminate between multi-line/multi-credit slot machines that provided differing rates of reinforcement. The aim was to determine if the capacity to discriminate structural characteristics of gaming machines influenced player choices in selecting ‘favourite’ slot machines. Slot machine gambling history, gambling beliefs and knowledge, impulsivity, illusions of control, and problem solving style were assessed in a sample of 48 first year undergraduate psychology students. Participants were subsequently exposed to a choice paradigm where they could freely select to play either of two concurrently presented PC-simulated slot machines programmed to randomly differ in expected player return rates (payback percentage) and win frequency (volatility). Results suggest that prior learning and cognitions (particularly gambler’s fallacy) but not payback, were major contributors to the ability of a player to discriminate volatility between slot machines. Participants displayed a general tendency to discriminate payback, but counter-intuitively placed more bets on the slot machine with lower payback percentage rates.

Keywords

Gaming machines Slot machines Payback percentage Return to player Volatility Win frequency 

References

  1. Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: A report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Report number six of the New Zealand gaming survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, A. E., & Pietras, C. J. (2008). Gambling on a simulated slot machine under conditions of repeated play. The Psychological Record, 58, 405–426.Google Scholar
  4. Chóliz, M. (2010). Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: Effect of the immediacy of the reward in slot machines. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 249–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.Google Scholar
  6. Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Clarifying the role of personality dispositions in risk for increased gambling behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 503–508.Google Scholar
  7. Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.Google Scholar
  8. Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. Delfabbro, P., Falzon, K., & Ingram, T. (2005). The effects of parameter variations in electronic gambling simulations: Results of a laboratory-based pilot intervention. Gambling Research, 17(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  10. Dickerson, M. G. (1979). FI schedules and persistence at gambling in the UK betting office. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 12, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 232–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dixon, M. R., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, S., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Binge eating, problem drinking, and pathological gambling: Linking behavior to shared traits and social learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 789–800.Google Scholar
  15. Frederick, S. (2005). Reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.Google Scholar
  16. Gilliland, J. A., & Ross, N. A. (2005). Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montréal: An environmental analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, 55–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Götestam, K. G., & Johansson, A. (2003). Characteristics of gambling and problematic gambling in the Norwegian context: A DSM-IV-based telephone interview study. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 189–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 265–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrigan, K. A. (2007). Slot machine structural characteristics: Distorted player views of payback percentages. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2009). PAR Sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 159–174.Google Scholar
  22. Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haw, J. (2008a). Random-ratio schedules of reinforcement: The role of early wins and unreinforced trials. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haw, J. (2008b). The relationship between reinforcement and gaming machine choice. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 55–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and hybrid model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B(3), 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linnet, J., Thomsen, K. R., Møller, A., & Callesen, M. B. (2010). Event frequency, excitement and desire to gamble, among pathological gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(2), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lo, R. (2000). Optimism and illusion of control in gambling. Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 12, 18–23.Google Scholar
  28. Loba, P., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Blackburn, J. M. (2002). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(4), 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lund, I. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in Norway: What part does the gambling machine play? Addiction Research and Theory, 14, 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgan, M. J. (1974). Effects of random reinforcement sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 301–310.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters, H., Hunt, M., & Harper, D. (2010). An animal model of slot machine gambling: The effect of structural characteristics on response latency and persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 521–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Productivity Commission. (2009). Australia’s gambling industries. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  34. Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the Gambler’s Belief Questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 143–149.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gaming machines actually work? Journal of Gambling Issues, 11, 10–50.Google Scholar
  36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.Google Scholar
  37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Volberg, R. A., & Abbott, M. W. (1994). Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 23, 976–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, M. B. (2003). “The seductiveness of poker machines”. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies (pp. 12–26), Canberra.Google Scholar
  40. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.Google Scholar
  42. Zlomke, K. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Modification of slot-machine preferences through the use of a conditional discrimination paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 39, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychology (A18)The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations