Losing More by Losing It: Poker Experience, Sensitivity to Losses and Tilting Severity
- 705 Downloads
In poker, detrimental decision-making as a result of losing control due to negative emotions is known as tilting. Previous evidence suggests that poker experience is related to better emotion regulation in dealing with poker losses, and possibly to reduced severity of tilting in the game. A correlational on-line study (N = 417) was conducted to operationalize the tilting phenomenon by defining certain experiential characteristics that conceivably protect players from tilting or predispose them to it. These characteristics, as well as a measurement of poker experience, were then used in predicting the severity of tilting. It was hypothesized that (1) players with more poker experience are more likely to perceive having tilted less severely, as a result of accumulating poker experience; (2) players with more poker experience have lower severity of tilting; (3) players with more poker experience report lower emotional sensitivity to losses; and (4) players with a higher emotional sensitivity to losses have higher severity of tilting. Hypotheses 1 and 4 were supported, hypothesis 3 was weakly supported, but contrary to hypothesis 2, poker experience was associated with higher tilting severity. It is argued that these results are sensible if experienced players are less likely to tilt in relative terms, per single hand, but more likely to tilt in the long run.
KeywordsOn-line poker Tilting Poker experience Sensitivity to losses Losing control
We wish to thank The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, The Kone Foundation, and The Academy of Finland for their financial support in this project. We also wish to thank the following Finnish poker communities for their interest in our research: www.pokerisivut.com, www.pokeritieto.com and www.pokerista.net. Lastly, we are grateful to Apophenia for providing us with ideas and inspiration.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aiken, L., & West, G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Angelo, T. (2007). Elements of poker. Self-published.Google Scholar
- Bjerg, O. (2011). Poker. The parody of capitalism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hayano, D. M. (1982). Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Massachusetts: Schenkman.Google Scholar
- Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Feldman Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Palomäki, J., & Laakasuo, M. Qualitative assessment of feelings associated with significant losses in poker. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, M. (2010). Randy “nanonoko” Lew and his rise to multi-table poker fame. Resource document. OnlinePoker.net. http://www.onlinepoker.net/poker-news/poker-pros-news/randy-nanonoko-lew-rise-multitable-poker-fame/7327. Accessed September 4, 2012.
- Sklansky, D., & Miller, E. (2006). No-limit Hold’em: Theory and practice. Henderson, NV: Two Plus Two Publishing.Google Scholar
- Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.). (2007). Do emotions hurt or help decision-making? A hedgefoxian perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar