The Impact of Jackpots on EGM Gambling Behavior: A Review
- 631 Downloads
This paper reviews literature on how jackpots influence Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) gambling behaviour. Most of the available evidence addresses the motivational effect of the mere presence of EGM jackpots on play, as actual wins are relatively rare for individual gamblers. The review identifies a distinction between rational, biased and irrational motivations that attract people to EGM jackpots. The evidence suggests that EGM jackpots should generate additional consumption on EGMs above machines that do not have such lottery-like features. Rational motivations are likely to lead to consumer surplus, whereas biased and irrational motivations are likely to contribute to excessive consumption. Moreover, there is evidence that excessive gambling consumption is strongly associated with gambling-related harm. Future research should identify how the structural features of different types of jackpots; such as progressive, deterministic, hidden, mystery, linked and wide-area jackpots; may differentially appeal to rational, biased and irrational gambling motivations. Jackpots are common feature of EGM games, and therefore it is important to have a better understanding of how jackpot features influence play on the machines.
KeywordsJackpot EGM Poker Slot Big win VLT
This review was funded by a Grant from Gambling Research Australia.
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest are declared.
- Business Pundit (2009). 10 People who won the lottery–then lost it all. The Business Pundit, from http://www.businesspundit.com/10-people-who-won-the-lottery-then-lost-it-all/.
- Camerer, C. F. (1995). Individual decision making. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton U. Press.Google Scholar
- Cook, P. J., & Clotfelter, C. T. (1993). The peculiar scale economies of lotto. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 634–643.Google Scholar
- Custer, R. L., & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out: Help for compulsive gamblers. New York: Facts on File Publications.Google Scholar
- Hare, S. (2010). Player tracking and precommitment trial: A program and outcome evaluation of the PlaySmart precommitment system. Schottler Consulting Pty Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.sa.gov.au/public/download.jsp?id=3188.
- Hing, N. (2007). Under the radar: what responsible gambling legislation doesn’t prevent. Paper presented to 17th Annual National Association for Gambling Studies Conference, Cairns, Qld, 14–16 November.Google Scholar
- Hing, N. (2008). A quantitative analysis of workplace influences on responsible gambling and problem gambling amongst employees of Queensland gaming venues. Report for the Queensland Office of Gaming Regulation, Queensland Treasury by the Centre for Gambling Education and Research, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2005). Gambling amongst gaming venue employees: Counsellors’ perspectives on risk and protective factors in the workplace. Gambling Research, 17(2), 25–46.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., & Haw, J. (2010). The influence of venue characteristics on a player's decision to attend a gambling venue. Final report for Gambling Research Australia by the Centre for Gambling Education & Research, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. Google Scholar
- Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Zazryn, T., Bakacs, L., & Shami, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers: Independent gambling authority South Australia prepared under the auspices of Australian Institute for Primary Care (AIPC) La Trobe University.Google Scholar
- McPherson, J. (2007). Beating the odds: the complete dictionary of gambling and games of chance. Docklands, VIC: GSP Books (Geoff Slattery Publishing).Google Scholar
- Pisaniello, S. L. (2003). The effect of varying jackpot structure and. illusory control on psychological entrapment in gambling. B of Jurisprudence, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries Report no. 10. Canberra.Google Scholar
- Rockloff, M. (2011). Validation of the consumption screen for problem gambling (CSPG). Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9260-2.
- Rockloff, M., & Greer, N. (2010a). Audience influence on EGM gambling: The protective effects of having others watch you play. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9213-1.
- Rockloff, M., & Greer, N. (2010b). Never smile at a crocodile: Betting on electronic gaming machines is intensified by reptile-induced arousal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9174-4.
- Rockloff, M., Greer, N., & Evans, L. G. (2012). The effect of mere presence on EGM gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues.Google Scholar
- Rockloff, M., Greer, N., & Fay, C. (2010). The social contagion of gambling: How venue size contributes to player losses. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9220-2.
- The State of Queensland. (2010). Office of liquor gaming and regulation jackpot system minimum technical requirements (v 2.2). Brisbane: Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar
- Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Webster, M. (2006). Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (Vol. 2006).Google Scholar