Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 775–790 | Cite as

The Impact of Jackpots on EGM Gambling Behavior: A Review

  • Matthew J. Rockloff
  • Nerilee Hing
Review Paper

Abstract

This paper reviews literature on how jackpots influence Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) gambling behaviour. Most of the available evidence addresses the motivational effect of the mere presence of EGM jackpots on play, as actual wins are relatively rare for individual gamblers. The review identifies a distinction between rational, biased and irrational motivations that attract people to EGM jackpots. The evidence suggests that EGM jackpots should generate additional consumption on EGMs above machines that do not have such lottery-like features. Rational motivations are likely to lead to consumer surplus, whereas biased and irrational motivations are likely to contribute to excessive consumption. Moreover, there is evidence that excessive gambling consumption is strongly associated with gambling-related harm. Future research should identify how the structural features of different types of jackpots; such as progressive, deterministic, hidden, mystery, linked and wide-area jackpots; may differentially appeal to rational, biased and irrational gambling motivations. Jackpots are common feature of EGM games, and therefore it is important to have a better understanding of how jackpot features influence play on the machines.

Keywords

Jackpot EGM Poker Slot Big win VLT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This review was funded by a Grant from Gambling Research Australia.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest are declared.

References

  1. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2011). Lottery gambling: A review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 15–33. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9194-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. (original 1738). Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braverman, J., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). How do gamblers start gambling: Identifying behavioural markers for high-risk internet gambling. The European Journal of Public Health. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp232.Google Scholar
  4. Business Pundit (2009). 10 People who won the lottery–then lost it all. The Business Pundit, from http://www.businesspundit.com/10-people-who-won-the-lottery-then-lost-it-all/.
  5. Camerer, C. F. (1995). Individual decision making. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.). Princeton: Princeton U. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, P. J., & Clotfelter, C. T. (1993). The peculiar scale economies of lotto. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 634–643.Google Scholar
  7. Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction, 101(4), 570–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Miller, N. (2008). Replication of low-risk gambling limits using Canadian provincial gambling prevalence data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 321–335. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9091-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Custer, R. L., & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out: Help for compulsive gamblers. New York: Facts on File Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 486–511. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. (2001). The psychology of lottery gambling. International Gambling Studies, 1(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1080/14459800108732286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hare, S. (2010). Player tracking and precommitment trial: A program and outcome evaluation of the PlaySmart precommitment system. Schottler Consulting Pty Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.sa.gov.au/public/download.jsp?id=3188.
  13. Hing, N. (2007). Under the radar: what responsible gambling legislation doesn’t prevent. Paper presented to 17th Annual National Association for Gambling Studies Conference, Cairns, Qld, 14–16 November.Google Scholar
  14. Hing, N. (2008). A quantitative analysis of workplace influences on responsible gambling and problem gambling amongst employees of Queensland gaming venues. Report for the Queensland Office of Gaming Regulation, Queensland Treasury by the Centre for Gambling Education and Research, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW.Google Scholar
  15. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2005). Gambling amongst gaming venue employees: Counsellors’ perspectives on risk and protective factors in the workplace. Gambling Research, 17(2), 25–46.Google Scholar
  16. Hing, N., & Haw, J. (2010). The influence of venue characteristics on a player's decision to attend a gambling venue. Final report for Gambling Research Australia by the Centre for Gambling Education & Research, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. Google Scholar
  17. Holtgraves, T. (2009). Gambling, gambling activities, and problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 295–302. doi: 10.1037/a0014181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 171–180. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000022308.27774.2b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaplan, H. R. (1987). Lottery winners: The myth and reality. Journal of Gambling Studies, 3(3), 168–178. doi: 10.1007/bf01367438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, H. R. (1988). Gambling among lottery winners: Before and after the big score. Journal of Gambling Studies, 4(3), 171–182. doi: 10.1007/bf01018330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kassinove, J. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the “near miss” and the “big win” on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 155–158. doi: 10.1037/0893-164x.15.2.155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knox, R. E., & Inkster, J. A. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 319–323. doi: 10.1037/h0025528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. List, J. A. (2005). A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(3), 945–948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408022101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livingstone, C., Woolley, R., Zazryn, T., Bakacs, L., & Shami, R. (2008). The relevance and role of gaming machine games and game features on the play of problem gamblers: Independent gambling authority South Australia prepared under the auspices of Australian Institute for Primary Care (AIPC) La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  27. Marfels, C. (2001). Is gambling rational? The utility aspect of gambling. Gaming Law Review, 5(5), 459–466. doi: 10.1089/109218801753204423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McPherson, J. (2007). Beating the odds: the complete dictionary of gambling and games of chance. Docklands, VIC: GSP Books (Geoff Slattery Publishing).Google Scholar
  29. Nyman, J. A., Welte, J. W., & Dowd, B. E. (2008). Something for nothing: A model of gambling behavior. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2492–2504. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2008.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pisaniello, S. L. (2003). The effect of varying jackpot structure and. illusory control on psychological entrapment in gambling. B of Jurisprudence, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  31. Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries Report no. 10. Canberra.Google Scholar
  32. Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2(1), 32–39. doi: 10.1007/bf01019932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rockloff, M. (2011). Validation of the consumption screen for problem gambling (CSPG). Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9260-2.
  34. Rockloff, M., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9042-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rockloff, M., & Greer, N. (2010a). Audience influence on EGM gambling: The protective effects of having others watch you play. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9213-1.
  36. Rockloff, M., & Greer, N. (2010b). Never smile at a crocodile: Betting on electronic gaming machines is intensified by reptile-induced arousal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9174-4.
  37. Rockloff, M., Greer, N., & Evans, L. G. (2012). The effect of mere presence on EGM gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues.Google Scholar
  38. Rockloff, M., Greer, N., & Fay, C. (2010). The social contagion of gambling: How venue size contributes to player losses. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9220-2.
  39. Rockloff, M., Signal, T., & Dyer, V. (2007). Full of sound and fury, signifying something: the impact of autonomic arousal on EGM gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 457–465. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9061-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134. doi: 10.1023/a:1023042708217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, V. L. (2003). Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics. American Economic Review, 93(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thaler, R., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: an experimental test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 647–661. doi: 10.1162/003355397555226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The State of Queensland. (2010). Office of liquor gaming and regulation jackpot system minimum technical requirements (v 2.2). Brisbane: Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation.Google Scholar
  44. Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(11), 1593–1604. doi: 10.3109/10826089909039417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Journal of Gambling Issues. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2004.11.21.Google Scholar
  46. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar
  47. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. doi: 10.1007/bf00122574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Weatherly, J. N., Sauter, J. M., & King, B. M. (2004). The “Big Win” and resistance to extinction when gambling. Journal of Psychology, 138(6), 495–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webster, M. (2006). Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (Vol. 2006).Google Scholar
  52. Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Capturing SCL and HR changes to win and loss events during gambling on electronic machines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young, M., Wohl, M., Matheson, K., Baumann, S., & Anisman, H. (2008). The desire to gamble: The influence of outcomes on the priming effects of a gambling episode. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 275–293. doi: 10.1007/s10899-008-9093-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Health and Social Science ResearchCentral Queensland UniversityBundabergAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Gambling Education and ResearchSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations