Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 661–674 | Cite as

The Frustrating Effects of Just Missing the Jackpot: Slot Machine Near-Misses Trigger Large Skin Conductance Responses, But No Post-reinforcement Pauses

  • Mike J. Dixon
  • Vance MacLaren
  • Michelle Jarick
  • Jonathan A. Fugelsang
  • Kevin A. Harrigan
Original Paper

Abstract

Near-misses in slot machines resemble jackpot wins but fall just short. Previous research has demonstrated that near-misses are behaviorally reinforcing despite the absence of monetary reward. We assessed the hedonic properties of near-misses by measuring the time between outcome delivery and the initiation of the next spin—the post-reinforcement pause (PRP) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) for losses, near-misses, and a range of wins (5, 15, 25, 50 or 250 credits) while participants (N = 122) played a slot machine simulator. PRPs and SCRs were compared for 40 low frequency and 22 high frequency slots players who were non-problem gamblers, 37 at risk players, and 23 problem gamblers. For winning outcomes, PRPs and SCRs tracked monotonically with win size such that progressively larger wins were associated with progressively larger PRPs and SCRs. Near-misses with jackpot symbols landing on the first two reels had significantly larger SCRs than regular losses, and other types of near misses. Crucially, PRPs for this kind of near-miss were significantly smaller than all wins, and when non-parametric statistics were used, significantly smaller than regular losses. This pattern of large SCRs and small PRPs suggest that these are highly frustrating outcomes that stimulate appetitive components of the reward system to promote continued gambling.

Keywords

Near-misses Post-reinforcement pauses Skin conductance responses Slot machines Gambling 

References

  1. Alcaro, A., Huber, R., & Panksepp, J. (2007). Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: An affective neuroethological perspective. Brain Research Reviews, 56, 283–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berridge, K. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 191, 391–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chase, H. W., & Clark, L. (2010). Gambling severity predicts midbrain response to near-miss outcomes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 6180–6187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, L., Crooks, B., Clarke, R., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dunn, B. D. (2011). Physiological responses to near-miss outcomes and personal control during simulated gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron, 61, 481–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cote, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 380–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Bernston (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200–223). NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker‐machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54, 335–348.Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M. D. (1990a). Addiction to fruit machines: A preliminary study among young males. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. D. (1990b). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of fruit machine gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths, M. D. (1990c). The cognitive psychology of gambling. The Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M. (1991). Psychobiology of the near-miss in fruit machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 125, 347–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrigan, K. A. (2008). Slot machine structural characteristics: Creating near-misses using high symbol award ratios. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kassinove, H. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the near-miss and the big win on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology and Addictive Behaviour, 15, 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koob, G. F. (2009). Neurobiological substrates for the dark side of compulsivity in addiction. Neuropharmacology, 56, 18–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008). Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 29–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leslie, J. C. (1996). Principles of behaviour analysis. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). How to push someone’s buttons: A comparison of four anger-induction methods. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2011). Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology, Electrodermal Activity to Wins and Losses, 49, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., Daugherty, D., & Small, S. L. (2007). Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler’s preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 237–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Osumi, T., & Ohira, H. (2009). Cardiac responses predict decisions: An investigation of the relation between orienting response and decisions in the ultimatum game. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 74–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Gambling addiction and the evolution of the “near-miss”. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters, H., Hunt, M., & Harper, D. (2010). An animal model of slot machine gambling: The effect of structural characteristics on response latency and persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 521–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near-miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2000). The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: An incentive-sensitization view. Addiction, 95, S91–S117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scarf, D., Miles, K., Sloan, A., Goulter, N., Hegan, M., Seid-Fatemi, A., et al. (2011). Brain cells in avian ‘prefrontal cortex’ code for features of slot-machine-like-gambling. PLoS ONE, 6, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 631–650.Google Scholar
  33. Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Capturing SCL and HR changes to win and loss events during gambling on electronic machines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2009). Parallel roles for dopamine in pathological gambling and psychostimulant addiction. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 2, 11–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike J. Dixon
    • 1
  • Vance MacLaren
    • 1
  • Michelle Jarick
    • 2
  • Jonathan A. Fugelsang
    • 1
  • Kevin A. Harrigan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.MacEwan UniversityEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations