Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 601–611 | Cite as

Gambling Involvement and Increased Risk of Gambling Problems

  • James G. Phillips
  • Rowan Ogeil
  • Yang-Wai Chow
  • Alex Blaszczynski
Original Paper

Abstract

The opportunity to gamble has undergone rapid expansion with technology allowing for access to gambling products 24 h a day. This increased online availability challenges governments’ abilities to restrict access to gambling. Indeed, the ready access to multiple forms of gambling may potentially contribute to impaired control over urges for problem gamblers. The present study considered whether problem gamblers manifested a tendency to engage in multiple forms of gambling and identified forms of gambling which were more strongly related to problem gambling. In reanalyses of two surveys (Sample 1, N = 464, Sample 2, N = 1141), significant relationships accounting for between 11.3 and 13.5 % of the variance were found between the numbers of forms of gambling accessed and degree of problem. Participation in online poker, playing cards and sports wagering were linked to problem gambling. Access to multiple forms of gambling may pose difficulties for the tracking and control of gambling.

Keywords

Gambling Availability Access Online Involvement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based in part on a study commissioned by Gambling Research Australia (Tender No 119/06).

References

  1. Abbott, M. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research, 18(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research Series No 12. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbott, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Ronnberg, S. (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 237–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broda, A., LaPlante, D., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., Bosworth, L. B., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Virtual harm reduction efforts for internet gambling: Effects of deposit limits on actual internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 27–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, D., Tse, S., Abbott, M., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2006). Key indicators of the transition from social to problem gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delfabbro, P. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of a limited reduction in electronic gaming machine availability on perceived gambling behaviour and objective expenditure. International Gambling Studies, 8, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doran, B., & Young, M. (2010). Predicting the spatial distribution of gambling vulnerability: An application of gravity modeling using ABS mesh blocks. Applied Geography, 30, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2004). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: User manual. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Available at: www.ccsa.ca.
  11. Forster, J. L., Murray, D. M., Wolfson, M., & Wagenaar, A. C. (1995). Commercial availability of alcohol to young people: Results of alcohol purchase attempts. Preventive Medicine, 24, 342–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gainsbury, S., Wood, R., Russell, A., Hing, N., & Blaszczynski, A. (2012). A digital revolution: Comparison of demographic profiles, attitudes and gambling behavior of Internet and non-Internet gamblers. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1388–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Orford, J., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2008). Socio-demographic correlates of Internet gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Report prepared for the Gambling Commission. Retrieved Oct 31, 2008, from: www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/UploadDocs/publications/Document/Internet%20Gambling%20secondary%20analysis.pdf.
  14. Haefeli, J., Lischer, S., & Schwarz, J. (2011). Early detection items and responsible gambling features for online gambling. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42(4), 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanitskaya, L., Brookins-Fisher, J., O’Boyle, I., Vibbert, D., Erofeev, D., & Fulton, L. (2010). Dirt cheap and without prescription: How susceptible are young US consumers to purchasing drugs from rogue Internet pharmacies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(2), e11. doi:  10.2196/jmir.1520.
  17. Johnson, E. J., Moe, W. W., Fader, P. S., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). On the depth and dynamics of online search behavior. Management Science, 50(3), 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2010). The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 175–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kruse, H. (2002). Narrowcast technology, interactivity, and the economic relations of space: The case of horse race simulcasting. New Media & Society, 4, 385–404.Google Scholar
  20. LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of actual Internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18(4), 410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LaPlante, D. A., Afifi, T. O., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). Games and gambling involvement among casino patrons. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9307-z.
  23. LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Disordered gambling, type of gambling and gambling involvement in the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. The European Journal of Public Health, 21(4), 532–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lund, I. (2008). The population mean and the proportion of frequent gamblers: Is the theory of total consumption valid for gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, D. C. (1998). Missing the Jackpot? The proliferation of gambling in Australia and its effect on local communities. Australian Geographical Studies, 36, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall, D. C., & Baker, R. G. V. (2002). The evolving market structures of gambling: Case studies modelling the socioeconomic assignment of gaming machines in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 273–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martyres, R. F., Clode, D., & Burns, J. M. (2004). Seeking drugs or seeking help? Escalating “doctor shopping” by young heroin users before fatal overdose. Medical Journal of Australia, 180(5), 211–214.Google Scholar
  29. McMillen, J., & Doran, B. (2007). Problem gambling and gaming machine density: Socio-spatial analysis of three Victorian localities. International Gambling Studies, 6, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montaner, M., Lόpez, B., & de la Rosa, J. L. (2003). A taxonomy of recommender agents on the internet. Artificial Intelligence Review, 19, 285–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, S. M., Thomas, A. C., Kyrios, M., & Bates, G. (2011). The self regulation of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:  10.1007/s10899-011-9265-x. Accessed Feb 16 from http://www.springerlink.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/content/m1t223n53p154l48/fulltext.pdf.
  32. Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Real limits in the virtual world: Self-limiting behaviour of Internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 463–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Nielsen, S., & Barratt, M. J. (2009). Prescription drug misuse: Is technology friend or foe? Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 81–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 211–243). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, J. G., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Gambling and the impact of new and emerging technologies and associated products. Report for Gambling Research Australia, Aug 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, J. G., & Ogeil, R. P. (2011). Decisional styles and risk of problem drinking or gambling. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R. P., & Blaszczynski, A. (in press) Electronic interests and behaviours associated with gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction.Google Scholar
  39. Potenza, M. N., Steinberg, M. A., & Wu, R. (2005). Characteristics of gambling helpline callers with self-reported gambling and alcohol use problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 233–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Productivity Commission (2010). Gambling: Public inquiry. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/gambling-2009. Accessed 9 July 2010.
  41. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005). The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 62, 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rigg, K. K., Kurtz, S. P., & Surratt, S. L. (2011). Patterns of prescription medication diversion among drug dealers. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. doi:  10.3109/09687637.2011.631197.
  43. Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2001). E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5, 115–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schellinck, T. & Schrans, T. (2011). Advances in the use of machine data to identify high risk and problem gamblers: Making it work for casinos worldwide. Paper presented at the 21st annual conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 23–25th November, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  45. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., & LaPlante, D. (2004a). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 40–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., LaBrie, R. A., Kidman, R. C., Donato, A. N., & Stanton, M. V. (2004b). Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 367–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaffer, H. J., & Martin, R. (2011). Disordered gambling: Etiology, trajectory, and clinical considerations. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 483–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaffer, H. J., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & LaBrie, R. A. (2010). Toward a paradigm shift in Internet gambling research: From opinion and self-report to actual behaviour. Addiction Research and Theory, 18(3), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Siler, K. (2010). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 401–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagenaar, A. C., Finnegan, J. R., Wolfson, M., Anstine, P. S., Williams, C. L., & Perry, C. L. (1993). Youth alcohol access: Where and how adolescents obtain alcoholic beverages. Public Health Report, 108, 459–464.Google Scholar
  51. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 105–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2007). Problem gambling on the Internet: Implications for Internet gambling policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9(3), 520–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2009). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  54. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2011). A comparative profile of the Internet gambler: Demographic characteristics, game-play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media & Society, 13, 1123–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wynne, H. J. (2002). Introducing the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Edmonton: Wynne Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Phillips
    • 1
  • Rowan Ogeil
    • 1
  • Yang-Wai Chow
    • 2
  • Alex Blaszczynski
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Psychology and PsychiatryMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations