Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attentional bias has been the subject of extensive empirical investigation in connection with chemical addictions, and it has been demonstrated in users of several different substances. The findings show that substance users seem to notice and attend to substance-related stimuli more readily than non-substance-related stimuli. Less is known, however, about attentional bias in pathological gambling. This systematic review investigates the existing empirical evidence on attentional bias in problem and pathological gamblers. Eleven studies were identified and evaluated following a literature search. Key findings are that problem and pathological gamblers seem to exhibit attentional bias toward gambling-related stimuli across different measuring paradigms, although some negative findings were reported. Recommendations aimed at improving research on this topic include better validation of measures, the inclusion of manipulations of craving level, and adding variations in gambling severity as a variable, as well as gambling preference. Research on therapeutic procedures aimed at reducing attentional bias is also recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Andrew, J. W., Sayette, M., Franken, I. H. A., & Schwartz, J. E. (2005). Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behaviour Research and Therapy. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, G., & Sharpe, L. (2003). Cognitive biases in problem gambling. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 15(2), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. B., Morse, E., & Sherman, J. E. (1986). The motivation to use drugs: A psychobiological analysis of urges. Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, 34, 257–323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: automaticity in a gambling‐specific modified Stroop task. Addiction, 98(1), 61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. P., Garner, M., Hudson, L., & Mogg, K. (2007). Influence of negative affect on selective attention to smoking-related cues and urge to smoke in cigarette smokers. Behavioural Pharmacology, 18, 255–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Bechara, A., Laloyaux, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011a). Time course of attentional bias for gambling information in problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. doi:10.1037/a0024201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Tibboel, H., Bechara, A., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011b). Reduced attentional blink for gambling-related stimuli in problem gamblers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cane, J. E., Sharma, D., & Albery, I. P. (2009). The addiction Stroop task: Examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1177/0269881108091253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crockford, D. N., Goodyear, B., Edwards, J., Quickfall, J., & El-Guebaly, N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biological Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.037.

  • Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 17–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2001). Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(1), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duka, T., & Townshend, J. M. (2004). The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1906-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadardi, J. S., & Cox, W. M. (2009). Reversing the sequence: Reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.015.

  • Ferris, J., Wynne, H., & Single, E. (1999). Measuring problem gambling in Canada, final report: Phase I. Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling, Canadian centre for Substance Abuse.

  • Field, M. (2010). Can’t take my eyes of you. The Psychologist, 23, 636–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi:10.1007/s00213-005-2251-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., Mogg, K., Zetteler, J., & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., Munafò, M. R., & Franken, I. H. A. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/a0015843.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, M., & Powell, H. (2007). Stress increases attentional bias for alcohol cues in drinkers who drink to cope. Alcohol and Alcoholism. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agm064.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, I. H. A. (2003). Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Janowski, M., Nikitina, A., & Duka, T. (2008). The role of attentional bias in mediating human drug-seeking behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1244-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concern. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 3–27). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubman, D. I., Allen, N. B., Peters, L. A., & Deakin, J. F. W. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence that drug cues have greater salience than other affective stimuli in opiate addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1177/0269881107083846.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, C. G. (2001). Cognitive biases and addiction: An evolution in theory and method. Addiction. doi:10.1080/09652140020016950.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, C. G., & Gettings, B. (1997). Automaticity of cognitive biases in addictive behaviours: Further evidence with gamblers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(4), 543–554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. A., & Fillmore, M. T. (2010). The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02860.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molde, H., Pallesen, S., Sætrevik, B., Hammerborg, D., Laberg, J., & Johnsen, B. H. (2010). Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. International Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1080/14459791003652501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong, K., Lee, E., Lee, C. H., Lee, B. O., & An, S. K. (2004). Increased P3 amplitudes induced by alcohol-related pictures in patients with alcohol dependence. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000139828.78099.69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, X., Colmant, M., Van Der Linden, M., Bechara, A., Bullens, Q., Hanak, C., et al. (2006). Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: The role of initial orienting. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00224.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV PG and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 564–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. J. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: an overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00101-0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. J., & Ehrman, R. N. (2004). The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews. doi:10.1177/1534582305275423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving—an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18(3), 247–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooke, S. E., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2008). Implicit cognition and substance use: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmakers, T. M., de Bruin, M., Lux, I. F. M., Goertz, A. G., Van Kerkhof, D. H. A. T., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.022.

  • Schoenmakers, T., Wiers, R. W., & Field, M. (2008). Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi:10.1007/s00213-007-1023-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Reviews of Clinical Psychology. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., & Field, M. (2010). Reduced attentional blink for alcohol-related stimuli in heavy social drinkers. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1177/0269881109106977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Spruyt, A., Field, M., Kemps, E., & Crombez, G. (2011). Testing the validity of implicit measures of wanting and liking. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97(2), 147–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Holst, R., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D., & Goudriaan, A. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. J., Heishman, S. J., Lerman, C., & Pickworth, W. (2007). Enhanced identification of smoking-related words during the attentional blink in smokers. Addictive Behaviors. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfling, K., Mörsen, C. P., Duven, E., Albrecht, U., Grüsser, S. M., & Flor, H. (2011). To gamble or not to gamble: At risk for craving and relapse—learned motivated attention in pathological gambling. Biological Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2004). Amphetamine primes motivation to gamble and gambling-related semantic networks in problem gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2007). A D2 antagonist enhances the rewarding and priming effects of a gambling episode in pathological gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rune Aune Mentzoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hønsi, A., Mentzoni, R.A., Molde, H. et al. Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review. J Gambl Stud 29, 359–375 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9315-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9315-z

Keywords

Navigation